<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/5.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
     xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss"
     xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
    <title>Unsolicited Due Dilligence (Unsolicited DD)</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feed.podbean.com/unsolicited-dd/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Unsolicited DD: Data Room</strong> breaks down real business and product cases to understand what happened, why smart people made the choices they did, and what operators can learn from the outcome.</p>
<p>Each episode starts with the case, follows the evidence, and extracts practical lessons on product, strategy, economics and execution.</p>
<p></p>
<p>https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</p>
<p>https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</p>
<p>https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</p>
<p></p>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:55 +0800</pubDate>
    <generator>https://podbean.com/?v=5.5</generator>
    <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <category>Business</category>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
          <itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
	<itunes:category text="Business">
		<itunes:category text="Entrepreneurship" />
		<itunes:category text="Management" />
	</itunes:category>
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Unsolicited DD</itunes:name>
            </itunes:owner>
    	<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:new-feed-url>https://feed.podbean.com/unsolicited-dd/feed.xml</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:image href="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/22582999/UDD_Data_Room_1400_under_2MB.jpg" />
    
    <item>
        <title>DR003 - Can You Engineer a Sales Team? Lessons from HubSpot (UDD Data Room)</title>
        <itunes:title>DR003 - Can You Engineer a Sales Team? Lessons from HubSpot (UDD Data Room)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/can-you-engineer-a-sales-team-lessons-from-hubspot/</link>
                    <comments>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/can-you-engineer-a-sales-team-lessons-from-hubspot/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:55 +0800</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/eafa7036-e6b4-36d0-b82c-953baa82c8a4</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode examines whether sales can be engineered by using HubSpot as a case study: hiring scorecards, repeatable training ramps, funnel visibility, and heavy inbound lead flow that created fast feedback loops.</p>
<p>It explains what HubSpot did well — measure lead flow, standardize processes, and build partner channels — and warns what you can’t automate: customer demand, judgment, and context. Practical takeaways: define the job, map demand sources, standardize the repeatable, measure movement through the buyer journey, and keep humans in the loop to learn and adapt.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode examines whether sales can be engineered by using HubSpot as a case study: hiring scorecards, repeatable training ramps, funnel visibility, and heavy inbound lead flow that created fast feedback loops.</p>
<p>It explains what HubSpot did well — measure lead flow, standardize processes, and build partner channels — and warns what you can’t automate: customer demand, judgment, and context. Practical takeaways: define the job, map demand sources, standardize the repeatable, measure movement through the buyer journey, and keep humans in the loop to learn and adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/5f8r7s46hcy4u7r2/DR002_20-_20HubSpot_20-_20Deep_20Daintree_20-_20Audio_20Master_20v1awwfk.mp3" length="15826485" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode examines whether sales can be engineered by using HubSpot as a case study: hiring scorecards, repeatable training ramps, funnel visibility, and heavy inbound lead flow that created fast feedback loops.It explains what HubSpot did well — measure lead flow, standardize processes, and build partner channels — and warns what you can’t automate: customer demand, judgment, and context. Practical takeaways: define the job, map demand sources, standardize the repeatable, measure movement through the buyer journey, and keep humans in the loop to learn and adapt.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>989</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
        <podcast:transcript url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/5uvsfvb9db38m4wd/DR002_20-_20HubSpot_20-_20Deep_20Daintree_20-_20Audio_20Master_20v1awwfk-tcpk59-Optimized.vtt" type="text/vtt" /><podcast:chapters url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/pxigusp8d6ymes3k/DR002_20-_20HubSpot_20-_20Deep_20Daintree_20-_20Audio_20Master_20v1awwfk_chapters.json" type="application/json" />    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Hold Until 2046: British American Tobacco vs Games Workshop — Network or Fortress? PE003 Private &amp; Equitable</title>
        <itunes:title>Hold Until 2046: British American Tobacco vs Games Workshop — Network or Fortress? PE003 Private &amp; Equitable</itunes:title>
        <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/hold-until-2046-british-american-tobacco-vs-games-workshop-%e2%80%94-network-or-fortress/</link>
                    <comments>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/hold-until-2046-british-american-tobacco-vs-games-workshop-%e2%80%94-network-or-fortress/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 14:44:24 +0800</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/585dbcdd-4227-32b5-a5d4-cf5d4afadb09</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode pits British American Tobacco against Games Workshop in a 20-year investment showdown, weighing BAT's global cash-generating nicotine network and transition risks against Games Workshop's cash-rich balance sheet, owned IP, and high margins.</p>
<p>Hosts and analysts debate durability, regulatory and cultural risks, valuation, and which company you'd prefer to hold until 2046, ending with a split verdict based on risk tolerance and price.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode pits British American Tobacco against Games Workshop in a 20-year investment showdown, weighing BAT's global cash-generating nicotine network and transition risks against Games Workshop's cash-rich balance sheet, owned IP, and high margins.</p>
<p>Hosts and analysts debate durability, regulatory and cultural risks, valuation, and which company you'd prefer to hold until 2046, ending with a split verdict based on risk tolerance and price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/7p44thiu7hxtvnhb/PE003_-_BAT_vs_Games_Workshop_-_Audio_Master_v18xusg.mp3" length="14742717" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode pits British American Tobacco against Games Workshop in a 20-year investment showdown, weighing BAT's global cash-generating nicotine network and transition risks against Games Workshop's cash-rich balance sheet, owned IP, and high margins.Hosts and analysts debate durability, regulatory and cultural risks, valuation, and which company you'd prefer to hold until 2046, ending with a split verdict based on risk tolerance and price.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>921</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
        <podcast:transcript url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/bxzvrbyfie7pk3p6/PE003_-_BAT_vs_Games_Workshop_-_Audio_Master_v18xusg-iqwujc-Optimized.vtt" type="text/vtt" /><podcast:chapters url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/zezmhdchhcbf3vjg/PE003_-_BAT_vs_Games_Workshop_-_Audio_Master_v18xusg_chapters.json" type="application/json" />    </item>
    <item>
        <title>PE002: H&amp;R Block vs D-Wave Quantum (Private &amp; Equitable)</title>
        <itunes:title>PE002: H&amp;R Block vs D-Wave Quantum (Private &amp; Equitable)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/pe002-hr-block-vs-d-wave-quantum-private-equitable/</link>
                    <comments>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/pe002-hr-block-vs-d-wave-quantum-private-equitable/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:58:53 +0800</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/aa70aebb-414d-32df-9f8d-3d6506b9593b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer">Two companies. Roughly the same market value. Almost nothing else in common.</p>
<p>H&amp;R Block produces nearly $4 billion in annual revenue, substantial earnings and cash flow, and returns hundreds of millions to shareholders. D-Wave Quantum has only a few million dollars of current revenue, but growing bookings, more than $500 million of liquidity, and a bet on quantum computing becoming a major new technology platform.</p>
<p>Sterling takes H&amp;R Block. Isaac takes D-Wave. Shepard moderates.</p>
<p>They argue what works today, what you are actually buying, what could kill each investment, and finally what happens when price enters the room.</p>
<p>At roughly $6.5–7.2 billion of equity value, would you rather own the proven cash-generating business facing long-term disruption, or the quantum-computing company whose enormous potential is already carrying an enormous valuation?</p>
<p>The question is not which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.</p>
<p>Market values and financial figures reflect the production snapshot used for this episode and may have changed since recording.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Unsolicited DD is the broader world behind Private &amp; Equitable: recurring characters with different business and investment lenses examining companies, strategy, products, markets and decisions. The aim is serious analysis without pretending there is only one reasonable way to see a case.</p>
<p>Follow Unsolicited DD
YouTube: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd'>https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a>
TikTok: <a href='https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd'>https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a>
Patreon: <a href='https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD'>https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a></p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer">Two companies. Roughly the same market value. Almost nothing else in common.</p>
<p>H&amp;R Block produces nearly $4 billion in annual revenue, substantial earnings and cash flow, and returns hundreds of millions to shareholders. D-Wave Quantum has only a few million dollars of current revenue, but growing bookings, more than $500 million of liquidity, and a bet on quantum computing becoming a major new technology platform.</p>
<p>Sterling takes H&amp;R Block. Isaac takes D-Wave. Shepard moderates.</p>
<p>They argue what works today, what you are actually buying, what could kill each investment, and finally what happens when price enters the room.</p>
<p>At roughly $6.5–7.2 billion of equity value, would you rather own the proven cash-generating business facing long-term disruption, or the quantum-computing company whose enormous potential is already carrying an enormous valuation?</p>
<p>The question is not which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.</p>
<p>Market values and financial figures reflect the production snapshot used for this episode and may have changed since recording.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Unsolicited DD is the broader world behind Private &amp; Equitable: recurring characters with different business and investment lenses examining companies, strategy, products, markets and decisions. The aim is serious analysis without pretending there is only one reasonable way to see a case.</p>
<p>Follow Unsolicited DD<br>
YouTube: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd'>https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a><br>
TikTok: <a href='https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd'>https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a><br>
Patreon: <a href='https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD'>https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/7scu2c3bj26374rs/PE002_20-_20H_26R_20Block_20vs_20D-Wave_20-_20Audio_20Master_20v1631xz.mp3" length="12013443" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Two companies. Roughly the same market value. Almost nothing else in common.
H&amp;R Block produces nearly $4 billion in annual revenue, substantial earnings and cash flow, and returns hundreds of millions to shareholders. D-Wave Quantum has only a few million dollars of current revenue, but growing bookings, more than $500 million of liquidity, and a bet on quantum computing becoming a major new technology platform.
Sterling takes H&amp;R Block. Isaac takes D-Wave. Shepard moderates.
They argue what works today, what you are actually buying, what could kill each investment, and finally what happens when price enters the room.
At roughly $6.5–7.2 billion of equity value, would you rather own the proven cash-generating business facing long-term disruption, or the quantum-computing company whose enormous potential is already carrying an enormous valuation?
The question is not which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.
Market values and financial figures reflect the production snapshot used for this episode and may have changed since recording.
 
Unsolicited DD is the broader world behind Private &amp; Equitable: recurring characters with different business and investment lenses examining companies, strategy, products, markets and decisions. The aim is serious analysis without pretending there is only one reasonable way to see a case.
Follow Unsolicited DDYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-ddTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_ddPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>750</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>PE001: The Safe Bet vs The Big Bet (Private &amp; Equitable)</title>
        <itunes:title>PE001: The Safe Bet vs The Big Bet (Private &amp; Equitable)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/pe001-private-equitable-001-the-safe-bet-vs-the-big-bet/</link>
                    <comments>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/pe001-private-equitable-001-the-safe-bet-vs-the-big-bet/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 16:55:20 +0800</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/908ccc22-59c6-32d7-8057-338a4022a48e</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>You can own one of two businesses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Marlow Supply is a mature specialist wholesaler with real customers, real revenue, a solid balance sheet and modest growth.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Kestrel Materials is a venture-backed deep-tech company with technical validation, institutional capital and much larger upside, but far less proof that the commercial model scales.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sterling takes Marlow. Isaac takes Kestrel. Shepard moderates.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They go blow by blow through what works today, where the upside comes from, what can kill each company and, finally, what happens when price enters the room.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The question is not simply which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Companies and figures in this experimental matchup are synthetic composites based on public-company archetypes. The synthetic terms are designed to test investment judgment and are not claims about any specific source company.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Private &amp; Equitable is an Unsolicited DD format built around comparative investment debates. The comparison is the product. The audience decides who advances.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>YouTube: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a>
TikTok: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a>
Patreon: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a>
Podcast: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/</a></p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can own one of two businesses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Marlow Supply is a mature specialist wholesaler with real customers, real revenue, a solid balance sheet and modest growth.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Kestrel Materials is a venture-backed deep-tech company with technical validation, institutional capital and much larger upside, but far less proof that the commercial model scales.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sterling takes Marlow. Isaac takes Kestrel. Shepard moderates.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They go blow by blow through what works today, where the upside comes from, what can kill each company and, finally, what happens when price enters the room.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The question is not simply which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Companies and figures in this experimental matchup are synthetic composites based on public-company archetypes. The synthetic terms are designed to test investment judgment and are not claims about any specific source company.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Private &amp; Equitable is an Unsolicited DD format built around comparative investment debates. The comparison is the product. The audience decides who advances.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>YouTube: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a><br>
TikTok: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a><br>
Patreon: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a><br>
Podcast: <a class="decorated-link cursor-pointer">https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/f3a9phwdw6mx3638/PE001_-_The_Safe_Bet_vs_The_Big_Bet_-_Audio_Master_v19degq.mp3" length="10836470" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[You can own one of two businesses.
 
Marlow Supply is a mature specialist wholesaler with real customers, real revenue, a solid balance sheet and modest growth.
 
Kestrel Materials is a venture-backed deep-tech company with technical validation, institutional capital and much larger upside, but far less proof that the commercial model scales.
 
Sterling takes Marlow. Isaac takes Kestrel. Shepard moderates.
 
They go blow by blow through what works today, where the upside comes from, what can kill each company and, finally, what happens when price enters the room.
 
The question is not simply which is the better company. It is which is the better investment.
 
Companies and figures in this experimental matchup are synthetic composites based on public-company archetypes. The synthetic terms are designed to test investment judgment and are not claims about any specific source company.
 
Private &amp; Equitable is an Unsolicited DD format built around comparative investment debates. The comparison is the product. The audience decides who advances.
 
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-ddTikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_ddPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDDPodcast: https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>677</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
        <podcast:transcript url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/6xmihwtznesjkknc/PE001_-_The_Safe_Bet_vs_The_Big_Bet_-_Captionsbs6z7.srt" type="application/srt" />    </item>
    <item>
        <title>DR001 - Juicero - The Test They Should Have Run Before Building It (Data Room)</title>
        <itunes:title>DR001 - Juicero - The Test They Should Have Run Before Building It (Data Room)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/dr001-juicero-the-test-they-should-have-run-before-building-it/</link>
                    <comments>https://unsolicited-dd.podbean.com/e/dr001-juicero-the-test-they-should-have-run-before-building-it/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 21:22:17 +0800</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">caseonboarding.podbean.com/24231774-3566-30dd-97cd-090234d2dbeb</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer">Juicero raised more than $100 million to build an extraordinarily sophisticated connected juice press. Then reporters showed that its proprietary produce packs could be squeezed by hand, sometimes just as quickly as using the machine.</p>
<p>In the first episode of Unsolicited DD: Data Room, we look past the easy conclusion that Juicero was simply a ridiculous product. The more useful question is how experienced operators, engineers and investors ended up solving increasingly difficult engineering, manufacturing and scaling problems without continuously retesting whether the expensive centerpiece of the system was actually necessary.</p>
<p>The takeaway: don’t just ask whether you can engineer the product. Keep testing which part actually creates the customer value, and whether the difficult part needs to exist at all.</p>
About Unsolicited DD
<p>Unsolicited DD is the broader world behind Data Room: recurring characters with different business and investment lenses examining companies, strategy, products, markets and decisions. The aim is serious analysis without pretending there is only one reasonable way to see a case.</p>
<p>Follow Unsolicited DD
YouTube: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd'>https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a>
TikTok: <a href='https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd'>https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a>
Patreon: <a href='https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD'>https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a></p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="PDq2pG_selectionAnchorContainer">Juicero raised more than $100 million to build an extraordinarily sophisticated connected juice press. Then reporters showed that its proprietary produce packs could be squeezed by hand, sometimes just as quickly as using the machine.</p>
<p>In the first episode of Unsolicited DD: Data Room, we look past the easy conclusion that Juicero was simply a ridiculous product. The more useful question is how experienced operators, engineers and investors ended up solving increasingly difficult engineering, manufacturing and scaling problems without continuously retesting whether the expensive centerpiece of the system was actually necessary.</p>
<p>The takeaway: don’t just ask whether you can engineer the product. Keep testing which part actually creates the customer value, and whether the difficult part needs to exist at all.</p>
About Unsolicited DD
<p>Unsolicited DD is the broader world behind Data Room: recurring characters with different business and investment lenses examining companies, strategy, products, markets and decisions. The aim is serious analysis without pretending there is only one reasonable way to see a case.</p>
<p>Follow Unsolicited DD<br>
YouTube: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd'>https://www.youtube.com/@unsolicited-dd</a><br>
TikTok: <a href='https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd'>https://www.tiktok.com/@unsolicited_dd</a><br>
Patreon: <a href='https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD'>https://www.patreon.com/c/UnsolicitedDD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/sutkgakyziqrhzps/Data_Room_001_-_Juicero_-_Audio_Master_v3au11l.mp3" length="20248075" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary>Juicero raised more than $100 million to build a sophisticated connected juice press, only for a simple hand-squeeze test to expose a deeper product question. In this first Data Room episode, we look at how smart founders, engineers and investors can solve increasingly difficult problems without rechecking whether the hardest part of the solution needs to exist at all.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Unsolicited DD</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>1265</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
        <podcast:transcript url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/qputrecdkbi2svkm/DR001_-_Juicero_-_Captions_v28uqs1.srt" type="application/srt" />    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
