<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/5.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
     xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"
     xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss"
     xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
    <title>The Pedestal Podcast</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feed.podbean.com/thepedestalpodcast/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com</link>
    <description>Mike Veerman, host of “Mike on Much”, and pop culture aficionado Shane Cunningham, along with their long-time friend, award winning writer/director/producer (and MENSA member) Jonathan Popalis, all bring you “The Pedestal Podcast", presented by MUCH studios. Join them for a deep dive into some of the movies we all hold near dear to our hearts — and debate whether or not they really belong there.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <generator>https://podbean.com/?v=5.5</generator>
    <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2019 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <category></category>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
          <itunes:summary>Mike Veerman, host of “Mike on Much”, and pop culture aficionado Shane Cunningham, along with their long-time friend, award winning writer/director/producer (and MENSA member) Jonathan Popalis, all bring you “The Pedestal” podcast, presented by MUCH studios. Join them for a deep dive into some of the movies we all hold near dear to our hearts — and debate whether or not they really belong there. On each episode, the case is argued FOR and AGAINST a certain film standing the test of time, and is ultimately voted to either stay on the pedestal it’s been held up on ... or be kicked off of it.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
<itunes:category text="" />
	<itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film">
		<itunes:category text="Film Reviews" />
	</itunes:category>
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Much Studios</itunes:name>
            </itunes:owner>
    	<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:image href="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/3622656/PEDESTAL_LOGO.png" />
    
    <item>
        <title>Caddyshack (EP32) with Jay Onrait</title>
        <itunes:title>Caddyshack (EP32) with Jay Onrait</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/caddyshack-ep32-with-jay-onrait/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/caddyshack-ep32-with-jay-onrait/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/c81bb5fc-0762-5e6b-ab5a-ca15912c5314</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we achieve total consciousness with the 1980 Harold Ramis sports comedy CADDYSHACK.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Jay Onrait (SC with Jay and Dan) and after Jay discloses the video store racket he ran back in Boyle, Alberta, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Chevy Chase’s run as America’s top leading man. We get into why the movie’s loose structure works in its favour, we go deep into the combined brilliance of Rodney Dangerfield and Ted Knight, and Jay wonders if this it the movie that finally made golf cool. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with Bill Murray’s affected performance. We all rag on what’s wrong with Danny’s story, Pops wonders why a movie called “Caddyshack” has so little to do with caddies, and Shane takes perhaps his most controversial stance in the podcast’s history: why the movie’s famous fart sound was no good.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we achieve total consciousness with the 1980 Harold Ramis sports comedy CADDYSHACK.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Jay Onrait (SC with Jay and Dan) and after Jay discloses the video store racket he ran back in Boyle, Alberta, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Chevy Chase’s run as America’s top leading man. We get into why the movie’s loose structure works in its favour, we go deep into the combined brilliance of Rodney Dangerfield and Ted Knight, and Jay wonders if this it the movie that finally made golf cool. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with Bill Murray’s affected performance. We all rag on what’s wrong with Danny’s story, Pops wonders why a movie called “Caddyshack” has so little to do with caddies, and Shane takes perhaps his most controversial stance in the podcast’s history: why the movie’s famous fart sound was no good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ildhtr/Pedestal_Caddyshack_original.mp3" length="77871959" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we achieve total consciousness with the 1980 Harold Ramis sports comedy CADDYSHACK.
 
We’re joined by special guest Jay Onrait (SC with Jay and Dan) and after Jay discloses the video store racket he ran back in Boyle, Alberta, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Chevy Chase’s run as America’s top leading man. We get into why the movie’s loose structure works in its favour, we go deep into the combined brilliance of Rodney Dangerfield and Ted Knight, and Jay wonders if this it the movie that finally made golf cool. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with Bill Murray’s affected performance. We all rag on what’s wrong with Danny’s story, Pops wonders why a movie called “Caddyshack” has so little to do with caddies, and Shane takes perhaps his most controversial stance in the podcast’s history: why the movie’s famous fart sound was no good.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4866</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>32</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Sleepless in Seattle (EP31) with Ana Golja</title>
        <itunes:title>Sleepless in Seattle (EP31) with Ana Golja</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/sleepless-in-seattle-ep31-with-ana-golja/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/sleepless-in-seattle-ep31-with-ana-golja/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/36dc4e10-e2d0-55e1-b848-215014af3091</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we don’t want to be in love, we want to be in love in a movie with the 1993 Nora Ephron romantic comedy SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Ana Golja (The Cuban, Degrassi: The Next Class) and after Pops explains why “The Cable Guy” is what first drew him to this movie, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how, despite the title, the movie is truly a cross-country epic. We get into how much we love Hanks, how the side characters all pulled their weight too, and how the movie had some genuinely laugh out loud jokes. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with a massive Meg Ryan debate. We talk about the movie’s very saggy middle, we wonder whether the movie’s mood doesn’t match its plot, and Shane and Pops try to punch up the climactic Empire State scene.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we don’t want to be in love, we want to be in love in a movie with the 1993 Nora Ephron romantic comedy SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Ana Golja (The Cuban, Degrassi: The Next Class) and after Pops explains why “The Cable Guy” is what first drew him to this movie, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how, despite the title, the movie is truly a cross-country epic. We get into how much we love Hanks, how the side characters all pulled their weight too, and how the movie had some genuinely laugh out loud jokes. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with a massive Meg Ryan debate. We talk about the movie’s very saggy middle, we wonder whether the movie’s mood doesn’t match its plot, and Shane and Pops try to punch up the climactic Empire State scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/py0kb9/05_05_20_The_Pedestal_Sleepless_in_Seattle_mp3_original.mp3" length="155391488" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we don’t want to be in love, we want to be in love in a movie with the 1993 Nora Ephron romantic comedy SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE.
 
We’re joined by special guest Ana Golja (The Cuban, Degrassi: The Next Class) and after Pops explains why “The Cable Guy” is what first drew him to this movie, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how, despite the title, the movie is truly a cross-country epic. We get into how much we love Hanks, how the side characters all pulled their weight too, and how the movie had some genuinely laugh out loud jokes. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with a massive Meg Ryan debate. We talk about the movie’s very saggy middle, we wonder whether the movie’s mood doesn’t match its plot, and Shane and Pops try to punch up the climactic Empire State scene.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3884</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>31</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Goonies (EP30)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Goonies (EP30)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-goonies-ep30/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-goonies-ep30/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/1b7dc797-940c-5742-9a61-650646926389</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we gotta do the Truffle Shuffle with the 1985 Richard Donner adventure comedy THE GOONIES.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane discloses his childhood dream of actually being a Goonie himself, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with debating what made Corey Feldman such a charismatic star. We talk about the beautiful setting of the town itself, why Chunk is the movie’s true breakout character and Pops ponders the differences between Richard Donner and Steven Spielberg’s directing styles. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s bizarre ending. We debate whether or not nostalgia is the only reason The Goonies remains well regarded, Pops complains about the movie’s annoying "kid" energy, and we go deep into Sean Astin's infamous kiss.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we gotta do the Truffle Shuffle with the 1985 Richard Donner adventure comedy THE GOONIES.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane discloses his childhood dream of actually being a Goonie himself, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with debating what made Corey Feldman such a charismatic star. We talk about the beautiful setting of the town itself, why Chunk is the movie’s true breakout character and Pops ponders the differences between Richard Donner and Steven Spielberg’s directing styles. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s bizarre ending. We debate whether or not nostalgia is the only reason The Goonies remains well regarded, Pops complains about the movie’s annoying "kid" energy, and we go deep into Sean Astin's infamous kiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/i0j5gi/Pedestal_Ep_30_Goonies_original.mp3" length="92119181" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we gotta do the Truffle Shuffle with the 1985 Richard Donner adventure comedy THE GOONIES.
 
After Shane discloses his childhood dream of actually being a Goonie himself, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with debating what made Corey Feldman such a charismatic star. We talk about the beautiful setting of the town itself, why Chunk is the movie’s true breakout character and Pops ponders the differences between Richard Donner and Steven Spielberg’s directing styles. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s bizarre ending. We debate whether or not nostalgia is the only reason The Goonies remains well regarded, Pops complains about the movie’s annoying "kid" energy, and we go deep into Sean Astin's infamous kiss.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5757</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>4</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>30</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>There's Something About Mary (EP29) with Miguel Rivas</title>
        <itunes:title>There's Something About Mary (EP29) with Miguel Rivas</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/theres-something-about-mary-ep29-with-miguel-rivas/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/theres-something-about-mary-ep29-with-miguel-rivas/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:14:47 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/9bc16029-0e3f-5c03-bd90-e9eccc0e876a</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, some of our best friends don’t know our names with the 1998 Farrelly Brothers comedy THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Miguel Rivas (The Beaverton, Baroness Von Sketch Show) and after getting our mind’s blown by learning how much money this movie made at the box office, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the underrated comedic brilliance of Keith David as Mary’s stepdad. We discuss how effectively the film moves through so many different styles of comedy, Shane defends Diaz as his choice for the movie’s MVP, and we all give it up for the epic “Puffy” dog fight. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all its troubling gay panic humour. We ponder whether or not the Farrellys Trojan-horsed in offensive jokes, Miguel stands up for both Brett Favre AND Sarah Silverman, and finally we do a deep dive on the infamous hair gel scene.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, some of our best friends don’t know our names with the 1998 Farrelly Brothers comedy THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Miguel Rivas (The Beaverton, Baroness Von Sketch Show) and after getting our mind’s blown by learning how much money this movie made at the box office, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the underrated comedic brilliance of Keith David as Mary’s stepdad. We discuss how effectively the film moves through so many different styles of comedy, Shane defends Diaz as his choice for the movie’s MVP, and we all give it up for the epic “Puffy” dog fight. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all its troubling gay panic humour. We ponder whether or not the Farrellys Trojan-horsed in offensive jokes, Miguel stands up for both Brett Favre AND Sarah Silverman, and finally we do a deep dive on the infamous hair gel scene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/y3d7a3/16_01_20_The_Pedestal_Something_About_Mary.mp3" length="187350104" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, some of our best friends don’t know our names with the 1998 Farrelly Brothers comedy THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY.
 
We’re joined by special guest Miguel Rivas (The Beaverton, Baroness Von Sketch Show) and after getting our mind’s blown by learning how much money this movie made at the box office, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the underrated comedic brilliance of Keith David as Mary’s stepdad. We discuss how effectively the film moves through so many different styles of comedy, Shane defends Diaz as his choice for the movie’s MVP, and we all give it up for the epic “Puffy” dog fight. We then move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all its troubling gay panic humour. We ponder whether or not the Farrellys Trojan-horsed in offensive jokes, Miguel stands up for both Brett Favre AND Sarah Silverman, and finally we do a deep dive on the infamous hair gel scene.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4683</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Exorcist (EP28)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Exorcist (EP28)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-exorcist-ep28/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-exorcist-ep28/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:48:20 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/a613cc25-68d5-5b87-80c5-331ad6317851</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, it’s an excellent day for an exorcism, with the 1973 supernatural horror film THE EXORCIST.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops reveals the movie that scared him the most as a kid (Spoiler: Gremlins), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the movie’s most audacious and outrageous lines. We laud the patience and process it has with its story, talk about how its incredible special effects still hold up, and Shane and Pops argue over what is truly the best scene.  We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bizarre and abhorrent British director character. We wonder how long it would actually take to be convinced that someone was possessed, Shane admonishes the priests for not tag-teaming the demon, as we all take issue with “Captain Howdy”.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, it’s an excellent day for an exorcism, with the 1973 supernatural horror film THE EXORCIST.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops reveals the movie that scared him the most as a kid (Spoiler: Gremlins), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the movie’s most audacious and outrageous lines. We laud the patience and process it has with its story, talk about how its incredible special effects still hold up, and Shane and Pops argue over what is truly the best scene.  We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bizarre and abhorrent British director character. We wonder how long it would actually take to be convinced that someone was possessed, Shane admonishes the priests for not tag-teaming the demon, as we all take issue with “Captain Howdy”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/sku6rw/10_01_20_The_Pedestal_Exorcist.mp3" length="190649144" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, it’s an excellent day for an exorcism, with the 1973 supernatural horror film THE EXORCIST.
 
After Pops reveals the movie that scared him the most as a kid (Spoiler: Gremlins), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the movie’s most audacious and outrageous lines. We laud the patience and process it has with its story, talk about how its incredible special effects still hold up, and Shane and Pops argue over what is truly the best scene.  We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bizarre and abhorrent British director character. We wonder how long it would actually take to be convinced that someone was possessed, Shane admonishes the priests for not tag-teaming the demon, as we all take issue with “Captain Howdy”.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4766</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>28</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Se7en (EP27) with Kelleth Cuthbert</title>
        <itunes:title>Se7en (EP27) with Kelleth Cuthbert</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/se7en-ep27-with-kelleth-cuthbert/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/se7en-ep27-with-kelleth-cuthbert/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/58d6fbda-6e79-5a1e-8c90-f55d2b30d4f6</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re no messiah, we’re a movie of the week, with the 1995 David Fincher crime thriller SE7EN.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest, Golden Globes Water Girl Kelleth Cuthbert (Bold and the Beautiful, Inside Edition) and after Kelleth compares notes with Pops on what life is like as a tall person, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Morgan Freeman’s masterful performance. We argue over when Brad Pitt was at his hottest, Kelleth does her best impression of the famous “What’s in the Box” scene, and Pops dives into the movie’s deep hatred of city life. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the Great Spacey Debate. We question whether or not the opening title sequence is stuck in the 90s, Shane describes why a barber would make the perfect criminal and Mike asks the question that fans of Se7en have pondered for years: who do you prefer on Frasier, Roz or Daphne?</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re no messiah, we’re a movie of the week, with the 1995 David Fincher crime thriller SE7EN.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest, Golden Globes Water Girl Kelleth Cuthbert (Bold and the Beautiful, Inside Edition) and after Kelleth compares notes with Pops on what life is like as a tall person, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Morgan Freeman’s masterful performance. We argue over when Brad Pitt was at his hottest, Kelleth does her best impression of the famous “What’s in the Box” scene, and Pops dives into the movie’s deep hatred of city life. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the Great Spacey Debate. We question whether or not the opening title sequence is stuck in the 90s, Shane describes why a barber would make the perfect criminal and Mike asks the question that fans of Se7en have pondered for years: who do you prefer on Frasier, Roz or Daphne?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/zw8spn/03_01_20_The_Pedestal_Seven.mp3" length="256036952" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re no messiah, we’re a movie of the week, with the 1995 David Fincher crime thriller SE7EN.
 
We’re joined by special guest, Golden Globes Water Girl Kelleth Cuthbert (Bold and the Beautiful, Inside Edition) and after Kelleth compares notes with Pops on what life is like as a tall person, we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Morgan Freeman’s masterful performance. We argue over when Brad Pitt was at his hottest, Kelleth does her best impression of the famous “What’s in the Box” scene, and Pops dives into the movie’s deep hatred of city life. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the Great Spacey Debate. We question whether or not the opening title sequence is stuck in the 90s, Shane describes why a barber would make the perfect criminal and Mike asks the question that fans of Se7en have pondered for years: who do you prefer on Frasier, Roz or Daphne?]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>6400</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>27</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Princess Bride (EP26) with Jordan Claire Robbins</title>
        <itunes:title>The Princess Bride (EP26) with Jordan Claire Robbins</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-princess-bride-ep26-with-jordan-claire-robbins/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-princess-bride-ep26-with-jordan-claire-robbins/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 12:17:14 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-princess-bride-ep26-with-jordan-claire-robbins-972db3894401dab20afd87c490be1a66</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;">In this episode, you killed our father so prepare to die with the 1987 Rob Reiner fantasy adventure classic THE PRINCESS BRIDE.</p>
<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;"> </p>
<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;">We’re joined by special guest Jordan Claire Robbins (The Umbrella Academy, Supernatural) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much we loved Fred Savage and his grandfather. Pops gushes over Andre the Giant (and reveals his secret passion for professional wrestling) and Shane does a reading of Inigo Montoya’s climatic scene that brings the house down. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the one scene that is so disastrous it was like it came from another movie. We go deep into “The Buttercup Problem” and Jordan takes major issue with Wesley’s mask.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;">In this episode, you killed our father so prepare to die with the 1987 Rob Reiner fantasy adventure classic THE PRINCESS BRIDE.</p>
<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;"> </p>
<p style="background:#f8f8f8;margin:18pt 0cm 18pt 0cm;">We’re joined by special guest Jordan Claire Robbins (The Umbrella Academy, Supernatural) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much we loved Fred Savage and his grandfather. Pops gushes over Andre the Giant (and reveals his secret passion for professional wrestling) and Shane does a reading of Inigo Montoya’s climatic scene that brings the house down. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the one scene that is so disastrous it was like it came from another movie. We go deep into “The Buttercup Problem” and Jordan takes major issue with Wesley’s mask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/mpqihy/09_12_19_The_Pedestal_-_The_Princess_Bride.mp3" length="221448128" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, you killed our father so prepare to die with the 1987 Rob Reiner fantasy adventure classic THE PRINCESS BRIDE.
 
We’re joined by special guest Jordan Claire Robbins (The Umbrella Academy, Supernatural) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much we loved Fred Savage and his grandfather. Pops gushes over Andre the Giant (and reveals his secret passion for professional wrestling) and Shane does a reading of Inigo Montoya’s climatic scene that brings the house down. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the one scene that is so disastrous it was like it came from another movie. We go deep into “The Buttercup Problem” and Jordan takes major issue with Wesley’s mask.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5536</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>26</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Breakfast Club (EP25) with Cynthia Loyst</title>
        <itunes:title>The Breakfast Club (EP25) with Cynthia Loyst</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-breakfast-club-ep25-with-cynthia-loyst/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-breakfast-club-ep25-with-cynthia-loyst/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-breakfast-club-ep25-with-cynthia-loyst-045511e11971c96293b17aacc98eecdc</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In our 25th episode, we mess with the bull and get the horns with the 1985 John Hughes teen comedy/drama THE BREAKFAST CLUB.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Cynthia Loyst (The Social, Author of “Find Your Pleasure: The Art of Living a More Joyful Life”) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how realistically it portrayed its teenage characters. We debate which of them each of us relate to the most, Cynthia goes into how much of the comedy still holds up, and Pops talks about why some of themes hit home so personally. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the ridiculous choreographed dance scenes, we discuss why Bender’s behaviour would never be tolerated in a movie today, and we go deep on how much we all were disappointed by Allison’s makeover.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our 25th episode, we mess with the bull and get the horns with the 1985 John Hughes teen comedy/drama THE BREAKFAST CLUB.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Cynthia Loyst (The Social, Author of “Find Your Pleasure: The Art of Living a More Joyful Life”) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how realistically it portrayed its teenage characters. We debate which of them each of us relate to the most, Cynthia goes into how much of the comedy still holds up, and Pops talks about why some of themes hit home so personally. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the ridiculous choreographed dance scenes, we discuss why Bender’s behaviour would never be tolerated in a movie today, and we go deep on how much we all were disappointed by Allison’s makeover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/6zmcqb/26_11_19_The_Pedestal_Breakfast_Club.mp3" length="236384696" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In our 25th episode, we mess with the bull and get the horns with the 1985 John Hughes teen comedy/drama THE BREAKFAST CLUB.
 
We’re joined by special guest Cynthia Loyst (The Social, Author of “Find Your Pleasure: The Art of Living a More Joyful Life”) and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how realistically it portrayed its teenage characters. We debate which of them each of us relate to the most, Cynthia goes into how much of the comedy still holds up, and Pops talks about why some of themes hit home so personally. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the ridiculous choreographed dance scenes, we discuss why Bender’s behaviour would never be tolerated in a movie today, and we go deep on how much we all were disappointed by Allison’s makeover.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5909</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>25</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Big Lebowski (EP24) with Max Kerman</title>
        <itunes:title>The Big Lebowski (EP24) with Max Kerman</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-big-lebowski-ep24-with-max-kerman/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-big-lebowski-ep24-with-max-kerman/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-big-lebowski-ep24-with-max-kerman-dc1b838b56d16da571ac963608c30a69</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we really tie the room together with the 1998 Coen Brothers crime comedy THE BIG LEBOWSKI.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by Arkells frontman and fellow "Mike on Much" host Max Kerman, and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much Max likes all the swearing in the movie. We get into all the classic quotable lines, the legendary characters (especially Jesus), and Max gives a big thumbs to all the Jewish humour throughout. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how episodic the whole thing sometimes feels, how annoying we all found Julianne Moore, and Shane and Pops argue over whether or not the Coens can pull off absurdist comedy.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we really tie the room together with the 1998 Coen Brothers crime comedy THE BIG LEBOWSKI.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by Arkells frontman and fellow "Mike on Much" host Max Kerman, and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much Max likes all the swearing in the movie. We get into all the classic quotable lines, the legendary characters (especially Jesus), and Max gives a big thumbs to all the Jewish humour throughout. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how episodic the whole thing sometimes feels, how annoying we all found Julianne Moore, and Shane and Pops argue over whether or not the Coens can pull off absurdist comedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/7xvapw/The_Pedestal_Big_Lebowski.mp3" length="67293503" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we really tie the room together with the 1998 Coen Brothers crime comedy THE BIG LEBOWSKI.
 
We’re joined by Arkells frontman and fellow "Mike on Much" host Max Kerman, and begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how much Max likes all the swearing in the movie. We get into all the classic quotable lines, the legendary characters (especially Jesus), and Max gives a big thumbs to all the Jewish humour throughout. We move onto the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how episodic the whole thing sometimes feels, how annoying we all found Julianne Moore, and Shane and Pops argue over whether or not the Coens can pull off absurdist comedy.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4205</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Jerry Maguire (EP23) with Matt Unsworth</title>
        <itunes:title>Jerry Maguire (EP23) with Matt Unsworth</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/jerry-maguire-ep23-with-matt-unsworth/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/jerry-maguire-ep23-with-matt-unsworth/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/jerry-maguire-ep23-with-matt-unsworth-172a76bc7f1b77d3f66d6ea53537ec78</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, you had us at hello with the 1996 Cameron Crowe romantic dramatic comedy JERRY MAGUIRE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We are joined once again by Matt Unsworth (Heist Podcast) and after touching on Crowe’s hot streak up to that point (3:11) and his fascination with becoming the next Billy Wilder (14:12), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how young Jonathan Lipnicki may have stolen the show (19:01). We talk about Cuba Gooding Jr’s Oscar winning performance (25:36), we debate whether or not Cush’s dad was a racist (31:58), and get into why the “had me at hello” scene holds up even better than we all remembered (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with whether or not Dorothy was too much of an idealized female character (48:41). Mike does the math on Jerry’s wild flight times (53:39), we break down why this movie is sometimes not as smart as it thinks it is (1:01:34), and Pops mounts a defense against the film’s attack on jazz (1:11:06).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, you had us at hello with the 1996 Cameron Crowe romantic dramatic comedy JERRY MAGUIRE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We are joined once again by Matt Unsworth (Heist Podcast) and after touching on Crowe’s hot streak up to that point (3:11) and his fascination with becoming the next Billy Wilder (14:12), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how young Jonathan Lipnicki may have stolen the show (19:01). We talk about Cuba Gooding Jr’s Oscar winning performance (25:36), we debate whether or not Cush’s dad was a racist (31:58), and get into why the “had me at hello” scene holds up even better than we all remembered (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with whether or not Dorothy was too much of an idealized female character (48:41). Mike does the math on Jerry’s wild flight times (53:39), we break down why this movie is sometimes not as smart as it thinks it is (1:01:34), and Pops mounts a defense against the film’s attack on jazz (1:11:06).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/n56de9/The_Pedestal_Jerry_Maguire_original.mp3" length="73102313" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, you had us at hello with the 1996 Cameron Crowe romantic dramatic comedy JERRY MAGUIRE.
 
We are joined once again by Matt Unsworth (Heist Podcast) and after touching on Crowe’s hot streak up to that point (3:11) and his fascination with becoming the next Billy Wilder (14:12), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how young Jonathan Lipnicki may have stolen the show (19:01). We talk about Cuba Gooding Jr’s Oscar winning performance (25:36), we debate whether or not Cush’s dad was a racist (31:58), and get into why the “had me at hello” scene holds up even better than we all remembered (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with whether or not Dorothy was too much of an idealized female character (48:41). Mike does the math on Jerry’s wild flight times (53:39), we break down why this movie is sometimes not as smart as it thinks it is (1:01:34), and Pops mounts a defense against the film’s attack on jazz (1:11:06).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4568</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>23</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Billy Madison (EP22)</title>
        <itunes:title>Billy Madison (EP22)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/billy-madison-ep22/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/billy-madison-ep22/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/billy-madison-ep22-49e3d3cefe0dc5c5c1b60a012cc5c224</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we are the smartest men alive with the 1995 Adam Sandler comedy BILLY MADISON.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After discussing the hits and misses of the Sandman’s early career (7:01), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a celebration of this movie’s bizarre absurdist style (15:46). We discuss why Eric is one of the all-time great comedy villains (23:11), how Sandler is actually a secret perfectionist (31:21), and Shane explains why the “Sloppy Joes” scene transformed him (41:57). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Billy’s “assault brutha” (52:02). Shane argues that this movie contributed to a lot of childhood bullying (56:04), Pops compares the movie to “Succession” in its depictions of extreme wealth (1:03:27), and we debate whether or not O’Doyle actually ruled (1:19:30).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we are the smartest men alive with the 1995 Adam Sandler comedy BILLY MADISON.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After discussing the hits and misses of the Sandman’s early career (7:01), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a celebration of this movie’s bizarre absurdist style (15:46). We discuss why Eric is one of the all-time great comedy villains (23:11), how Sandler is actually a secret perfectionist (31:21), and Shane explains why the “Sloppy Joes” scene transformed him (41:57). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Billy’s “assault brutha” (52:02). Shane argues that this movie contributed to a lot of childhood bullying (56:04), Pops compares the movie to “Succession” in its depictions of extreme wealth (1:03:27), and we debate whether or not O’Doyle actually ruled (1:19:30).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/vmwere/The_Pedestal_Billy_Madison.mp3" length="91434050" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we are the smartest men alive with the 1995 Adam Sandler comedy BILLY MADISON.
 
After discussing the hits and misses of the Sandman’s early career (7:01), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a celebration of this movie’s bizarre absurdist style (15:46). We discuss why Eric is one of the all-time great comedy villains (23:11), how Sandler is actually a secret perfectionist (31:21), and Shane explains why the “Sloppy Joes” scene transformed him (41:57). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Billy’s “assault brutha” (52:02). Shane argues that this movie contributed to a lot of childhood bullying (56:04), Pops compares the movie to “Succession” in its depictions of extreme wealth (1:03:27), and we debate whether or not O’Doyle actually ruled (1:19:30).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5714</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>22</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Matrix (EP21)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Matrix (EP21)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-matrix-ep21/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-matrix-ep21/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2019 05:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-matrix-ep21-4a47d7cf50979916e548cd88c1a8ac9c</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we know kung fu with the 1999 cyberpunk sci fi classic THE MATRIX.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After we all reminisce about our high school band experiences (10:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie kicks off with such a big bang (14:55). We debate about the fine balance between the movie’s slick action and grand philosophies (24:10), Shane wonders if Cypher was an incel (36:58), and Mike asks us all if we recognize AI as a real life form (44:30). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how the rules of the matrix seemed wildly inconsistent throughout the movie (54.04). Pops complains about the pointlessness of the Oracle (56:17), Shane rips on Keanu’s reading of “Déjà vu” (1:01:10), and we all ruminate over Carrie-Anne Moss’s career post-Matrix (1:13:48).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we know kung fu with the 1999 cyberpunk sci fi classic THE MATRIX.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After we all reminisce about our high school band experiences (10:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie kicks off with such a big bang (14:55). We debate about the fine balance between the movie’s slick action and grand philosophies (24:10), Shane wonders if Cypher was an incel (36:58), and Mike asks us all if we recognize AI as a real life form (44:30). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how the rules of the matrix seemed wildly inconsistent throughout the movie (54.04). Pops complains about the pointlessness of the Oracle (56:17), Shane rips on Keanu’s reading of “Déjà vu” (1:01:10), and we all ruminate over Carrie-Anne Moss’s career post-Matrix (1:13:48).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/j4s636/The_Pedestal_Matrix_w_Tag.mp3" length="80629163" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we know kung fu with the 1999 cyberpunk sci fi classic THE MATRIX.
 
After we all reminisce about our high school band experiences (10:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie kicks off with such a big bang (14:55). We debate about the fine balance between the movie’s slick action and grand philosophies (24:10), Shane wonders if Cypher was an incel (36:58), and Mike asks us all if we recognize AI as a real life form (44:30). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how the rules of the matrix seemed wildly inconsistent throughout the movie (54.04). Pops complains about the pointlessness of the Oracle (56:17), Shane rips on Keanu’s reading of “Déjà vu” (1:01:10), and we all ruminate over Carrie-Anne Moss’s career post-Matrix (1:13:48).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>5039</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>3</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>21</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Titanic (EP20) with Chloe Wilde</title>
        <itunes:title>Titanic (EP20) with Chloe Wilde</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/titanic-ep20-with-chloe-wilde/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/titanic-ep20-with-chloe-wilde/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:30:05 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/titanic-ep20-with-chloe-wilde-f3adf4f41e25b35ce4857931452ae9b8</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In the final episode of season two, we jump if you jump with the 1997 James Cameron romantic epic TITANIC.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Chloe Wilde (eTalk, Healthy is Hot Podcast) who first recounts why seeing this movie with her mom traumatized her as a kid (6:10). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with some love for Kathy Bates and Victor Garber (14:54) and James Horner’s celebrated score (17:46). We talk about how the special effects were ahead of their time (25:31), we all fawn over Leo (33:29), and Shane explains why he loves it when a loser turns out to be the cool guy (37:53). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems we had with Rose both young (41:22) and old (45:58). We dive deep into the “door” debate (52:42), and Chloe gripes about Billy Zane’s aggressively one note performance (1:03:57).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final episode of season two, we jump if you jump with the 1997 James Cameron romantic epic TITANIC.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by special guest Chloe Wilde (eTalk, Healthy is Hot Podcast) who first recounts why seeing this movie with her mom traumatized her as a kid (6:10). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with some love for Kathy Bates and Victor Garber (14:54) and James Horner’s celebrated score (17:46). We talk about how the special effects were ahead of their time (25:31), we all fawn over Leo (33:29), and Shane explains why he loves it when a loser turns out to be the cool guy (37:53). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems we had with Rose both young (41:22) and old (45:58). We dive deep into the “door” debate (52:42), and Chloe gripes about Billy Zane’s aggressively one note performance (1:03:57).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/y7wpbj/10_06_19_The_Pedetal_ep20_Titanic.mp3" length="181314740" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the final episode of season two, we jump if you jump with the 1997 James Cameron romantic epic TITANIC.
 
We’re joined by special guest Chloe Wilde (eTalk, Healthy is Hot Podcast) who first recounts why seeing this movie with her mom traumatized her as a kid (6:10). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with some love for Kathy Bates and Victor Garber (14:54) and James Horner’s celebrated score (17:46). We talk about how the special effects were ahead of their time (25:31), we all fawn over Leo (33:29), and Shane explains why he loves it when a loser turns out to be the cool guy (37:53). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems we had with Rose both young (41:22) and old (45:58). We dive deep into the “door” debate (52:42), and Chloe gripes about Billy Zane’s aggressively one note performance (1:03:57).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4532</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>20</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Napoleon Dynamite (EP19)</title>
        <itunes:title>Napoleon Dynamite (EP19)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/napoleon-dynamite-ep19/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/napoleon-dynamite-ep19/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:28:42 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/napoleon-dynamite-ep19-85e6852161226eb0a272651ee1854e6a</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we make all of your wildest dreams come true with the 2004 indie cult comedy NAPOLEON DYNAMITE</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops defends seeing it NINE times in movie theatres (4:52), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a discussion about comedy auteurs and if Jared Hess is truly one of them (16:15). We talk about why Kip rules (22:37), Pops posits that there’s a lot more plot going on than meets the eye (30:40), and Shane votes for Pedro as his favorite character (35:08). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the hacky impressions it spawned (48:55), we examine why “Rex Kwan Do” feels like it belongs in an entirely different movie (55:19), and then talk about the creepy turn the film took with Uncle Rico (1:06:18).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we make all of your wildest dreams come true with the 2004 indie cult comedy NAPOLEON DYNAMITE</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops defends seeing it NINE times in movie theatres (4:52), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a discussion about comedy auteurs and if Jared Hess is truly one of them (16:15). We talk about why Kip rules (22:37), Pops posits that there’s a lot more plot going on than meets the eye (30:40), and Shane votes for Pedro as his favorite character (35:08). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the hacky impressions it spawned (48:55), we examine why “Rex Kwan Do” feels like it belongs in an entirely different movie (55:19), and then talk about the creepy turn the film took with Uncle Rico (1:06:18).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/fsexua/06_06_19_Pedestal_Ep_19_Napoleon_Dynamite.mp3" length="72079412" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we make all of your wildest dreams come true with the 2004 indie cult comedy NAPOLEON DYNAMITE
 
After Pops defends seeing it NINE times in movie theatres (4:52), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a discussion about comedy auteurs and if Jared Hess is truly one of them (16:15). We talk about why Kip rules (22:37), Pops posits that there’s a lot more plot going on than meets the eye (30:40), and Shane votes for Pedro as his favorite character (35:08). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the hacky impressions it spawned (48:55), we examine why “Rex Kwan Do” feels like it belongs in an entirely different movie (55:19), and then talk about the creepy turn the film took with Uncle Rico (1:06:18).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4504</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>19</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>He Got Game (EP18)</title>
        <itunes:title>He Got Game (EP18)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/he-got-game-ep18/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/he-got-game-ep18/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:27:35 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/he-got-game-ep18-eb73e69a2cc121f4f0be2a92f550d3e8</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cross you to the left and take you back to the right with the 1998 Spike Lee joint HE GOT GAME.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After both Shane and Mike disclose the legitimate cameos they have in two other massive basketball movies (8:04), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Shane’s big reveal of what he now thinks of Ray Allen’s performance (11:54). We get into Spike Lee’s unique style as a director (25:13), why the story may be more sci-fi than sports (31:04), and discuss the legendary one on one game between Allen and Denzel (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bewildering hooker subplot (53:21), how many of the secondary characters constantly drag the movie down (58:23), and Pops has a major beef with the orchestral music choices (1:04:48).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we cross you to the left and take you back to the right with the 1998 Spike Lee joint HE GOT GAME.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After both Shane and Mike disclose the legitimate cameos they have in two other massive basketball movies (8:04), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Shane’s big reveal of what he now thinks of Ray Allen’s performance (11:54). We get into Spike Lee’s unique style as a director (25:13), why the story may be more sci-fi than sports (31:04), and discuss the legendary one on one game between Allen and Denzel (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bewildering hooker subplot (53:21), how many of the secondary characters constantly drag the movie down (58:23), and Pops has a major beef with the orchestral music choices (1:04:48).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/4wxfky/03_06_19_Pedestal_Ep_18_He_Got_Game.mp3" length="72847526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we cross you to the left and take you back to the right with the 1998 Spike Lee joint HE GOT GAME.
 
After both Shane and Mike disclose the legitimate cameos they have in two other massive basketball movies (8:04), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Shane’s big reveal of what he now thinks of Ray Allen’s performance (11:54). We get into Spike Lee’s unique style as a director (25:13), why the story may be more sci-fi than sports (31:04), and discuss the legendary one on one game between Allen and Denzel (37:52). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the bewildering hooker subplot (53:21), how many of the secondary characters constantly drag the movie down (58:23), and Pops has a major beef with the orchestral music choices (1:04:48).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4552</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Big Fish (EP17)</title>
        <itunes:title>Big Fish (EP17)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/big-fish-ep17/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/big-fish-ep17/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:26:47 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/big-fish-ep17-d5d1acfaa759fb7e306515da7f7ace37</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In our final Personal Pedestal episode of season 2, we’re living in a fairy tale with the 2003 Tim Burton fantasy comedy BIG FISH.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and what it was like to try and hold back his tears watching it alone in a movie theatre (6:10). After a deep dive into our thoughts on Tim Burton’s career (11:45), we begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the movie’s theory that stories are meant to be more about feelings than facts (20:43). We get into Albert Finney’s show-stopping “Crow” joke (33:15), and why the ending might be the greatest of all time (41:50). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Ewan McGregor’s bizarre accent work (44:53). We debate the harshness of Billy Cruddup’s performance (49:18), how the love story may not have aged that well (54:55), and Mike speculates if this movie has the ultimate storytelling “cheat code” built into it (1:04:21).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our final Personal Pedestal episode of season 2, we’re living in a fairy tale with the 2003 Tim Burton fantasy comedy BIG FISH.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Mike explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and what it was like to try and hold back his tears watching it alone in a movie theatre (6:10). After a deep dive into our thoughts on Tim Burton’s career (11:45), we begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the movie’s theory that stories are meant to be more about feelings than facts (20:43). We get into Albert Finney’s show-stopping “Crow” joke (33:15), and why the ending might be the greatest of all time (41:50). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Ewan McGregor’s bizarre accent work (44:53). We debate the harshness of Billy Cruddup’s performance (49:18), how the love story may not have aged that well (54:55), and Mike speculates if this movie has the ultimate storytelling “cheat code” built into it (1:04:21).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/qr4e56/10_06_19_The_Pedestal_ep17_Big_Fish.mp3" length="166552580" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In our final Personal Pedestal episode of season 2, we’re living in a fairy tale with the 2003 Tim Burton fantasy comedy BIG FISH.
 
Mike explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and what it was like to try and hold back his tears watching it alone in a movie theatre (6:10). After a deep dive into our thoughts on Tim Burton’s career (11:45), we begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the movie’s theory that stories are meant to be more about feelings than facts (20:43). We get into Albert Finney’s show-stopping “Crow” joke (33:15), and why the ending might be the greatest of all time (41:50). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Ewan McGregor’s bizarre accent work (44:53). We debate the harshness of Billy Cruddup’s performance (49:18), how the love story may not have aged that well (54:55), and Mike speculates if this movie has the ultimate storytelling “cheat code” built into it (1:04:21).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4163</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>17</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Misery (EP16)</title>
        <itunes:title>Misery (EP16)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/misery-ep16/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/misery-ep16/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:25:20 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/misery-ep16-70690732657e8ad8424ae799f38e681b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In our second Personal Pedestal episode, we’re your number one fan with the 1990 adaptation of the Stephen King horror novel MISERY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pops explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and how he’s been a devout Stephen King superfan since childhood (2:56). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the tour de force performance of Kathy Bates (8:37). We talk about the iconic sledgehammer scene (15:33), the prescience this film had on the rise of toxic fandom (30:17), and Mike makes the argument that Annie Wilkes is just a very effective creative director (46:36). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with the general “TV Movie” quality of the film (51:36), the myriad problems we all had with the ending (1:03:51), and we fiercely debate whether or not Wilkes uses a racial slur (1:07:37). Finally Mike wonders if the movie tips too far into being just “suffer porn” (1:11:07).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our second Personal Pedestal episode, we’re your number one fan with the 1990 adaptation of the Stephen King horror novel MISERY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pops explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and how he’s been a devout Stephen King superfan since childhood (2:56). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the tour de force performance of Kathy Bates (8:37). We talk about the iconic sledgehammer scene (15:33), the prescience this film had on the rise of toxic fandom (30:17), and Mike makes the argument that Annie Wilkes is just a very effective creative director (46:36). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with the general “TV Movie” quality of the film (51:36), the myriad problems we all had with the ending (1:03:51), and we fiercely debate whether or not Wilkes uses a racial slur (1:07:37). Finally Mike wonders if the movie tips too far into being just “suffer porn” (1:11:07).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/rsk7f4/10_06_19_The_Pedestal_ep16_Misery.mp3" length="198019784" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In our second Personal Pedestal episode, we’re your number one fan with the 1990 adaptation of the Stephen King horror novel MISERY.
 
Pops explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and how he’s been a devout Stephen King superfan since childhood (2:56). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the tour de force performance of Kathy Bates (8:37). We talk about the iconic sledgehammer scene (15:33), the prescience this film had on the rise of toxic fandom (30:17), and Mike makes the argument that Annie Wilkes is just a very effective creative director (46:36). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with the general “TV Movie” quality of the film (51:36), the myriad problems we all had with the ending (1:03:51), and we fiercely debate whether or not Wilkes uses a racial slur (1:07:37). Finally Mike wonders if the movie tips too far into being just “suffer porn” (1:11:07).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4950</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Rules of Attraction (EP15)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Rules of Attraction (EP15)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-rules-of-attraction-ep15/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-rules-of-attraction-ep15/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:22:41 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-rules-of-attraction-ep15-2d818c0bdcce7c7cf2ff5caa7c3e3db7</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In our first ever Personal Pedestal episode, we’re emotional vampires with the 2002 Roger Avary black comedy THE RULES OF ATTRACTION.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Shane explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and why it made him think Roger Avary was a superior director to Quentin Tarantino (8:36). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the kinds of risks Avary took that we had never seen before (13:42). We gush over the famous “movie within a movie” euro trip scene (15:53), debate whether or not the dark satire does more damage than good (31:20), and if Paul was the breakout character (42:09). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Van Der Beek feeling very miscast (51:13), how everything has a “student film” quality (54:17), and why in retrospect Shane found so much of this movie very annoying (58:42).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our first ever Personal Pedestal episode, we’re emotional vampires with the 2002 Roger Avary black comedy THE RULES OF ATTRACTION.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Shane explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and why it made him think Roger Avary was a superior director to Quentin Tarantino (8:36). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the kinds of risks Avary took that we had never seen before (13:42). We gush over the famous “movie within a movie” euro trip scene (15:53), debate whether or not the dark satire does more damage than good (31:20), and if Paul was the breakout character (42:09). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Van Der Beek feeling very miscast (51:13), how everything has a “student film” quality (54:17), and why in retrospect Shane found so much of this movie very annoying (58:42).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/byzgp6/31_05_19_Pedestal_Ep_15_Rules_of_Attraction.mp3" length="64326548" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In our first ever Personal Pedestal episode, we’re emotional vampires with the 2002 Roger Avary black comedy THE RULES OF ATTRACTION.
 
Shane explains why this movie is on his own personal pedestal, and why it made him think Roger Avary was a superior director to Quentin Tarantino (8:36). We then begin the case for putting it on the pedestal with the kinds of risks Avary took that we had never seen before (13:42). We gush over the famous “movie within a movie” euro trip scene (15:53), debate whether or not the dark satire does more damage than good (31:20), and if Paul was the breakout character (42:09). We move on to the case for keeping it off the pedestal with Van Der Beek feeling very miscast (51:13), how everything has a “student film” quality (54:17), and why in retrospect Shane found so much of this movie very annoying (58:42).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4020</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Terminator 2: Judgement Day (EP14)</title>
        <itunes:title>Terminator 2: Judgement Day (EP14)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/terminator-2-judgement-day-ep14/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/terminator-2-judgement-day-ep14/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:21:38 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/terminator-2-judgement-day-ep14-f28ddcfdc99598b1f9d673f14aa8eef2</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle with the 1991 Arnold Schwarzenegger action blockbuster TERMINATOR 2: JUDGEMENT DAY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops divulges all the different ways this movie traumatized him in his youth (7:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with discussing what makes James Cameron such a prolific director (12:01). We debate how “sexy” Arnold is in this movie (17:30), how the special effects are still mind blowing (32:12), and whether or not Linda Hamilton actually stole the show (45:41). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems with the biker bar scene (52:15), Mike points out a very cringe worthy T-1000 line (1:01:01), and we discuss the inherent paradoxes that exist in any story about time travel (1:16:03).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle with the 1991 Arnold Schwarzenegger action blockbuster TERMINATOR 2: JUDGEMENT DAY.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops divulges all the different ways this movie traumatized him in his youth (7:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with discussing what makes James Cameron such a prolific director (12:01). We debate how “sexy” Arnold is in this movie (17:30), how the special effects are still mind blowing (32:12), and whether or not Linda Hamilton actually stole the show (45:41). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems with the biker bar scene (52:15), Mike points out a very cringe worthy T-1000 line (1:01:01), and we discuss the inherent paradoxes that exist in any story about time travel (1:16:03).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/f8y7s4/31_05_19_Pedestal_Ep_14_Terminator_2.mp3" length="78626729" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we need your clothes, your boots and your motorcycle with the 1991 Arnold Schwarzenegger action blockbuster TERMINATOR 2: JUDGEMENT DAY.
 
After Pops divulges all the different ways this movie traumatized him in his youth (7:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with discussing what makes James Cameron such a prolific director (12:01). We debate how “sexy” Arnold is in this movie (17:30), how the special effects are still mind blowing (32:12), and whether or not Linda Hamilton actually stole the show (45:41). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the problems with the biker bar scene (52:15), Mike points out a very cringe worthy T-1000 line (1:01:01), and we discuss the inherent paradoxes that exist in any story about time travel (1:16:03).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4914</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ghost (EP13) with Matt Unsworth</title>
        <itunes:title>Ghost (EP13) with Matt Unsworth</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/ghost-ep13/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/ghost-ep13/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:20:35 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/ghost-ep13-f12d6a737c6a7f2402cc9fe7f1dae643</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re hungry for your touch with the 1990 Patrick Swayze romantic thriller GHOST.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by our very first guest, Hollywood screenwriter Matt Unsworth (Happy Together, Heist Podcast) as we first recollect how scary the demons were for us as kids (7:22). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with all things Whoopi (12:14). We all debate whether it’s worth going crazy for Swayze (18:09), Mike praises the logic of the supernatural plot (28:23), and Unsworth explains why he loves the ending and its possible larger ramifications (38:12). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how tonally disjointed it feels throughout (41:06), Pops gets pissed about the rules of being a ghost (44:50), and we wonder if this entire movie runs only on star power (49:45). Finally, after a historic deadlock, Mike on Much co-host and Arkells front man Max Kerman drops in to cast the deciding vote (1:03:22).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re hungry for your touch with the 1990 Patrick Swayze romantic thriller GHOST.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We’re joined by our very first guest, Hollywood screenwriter Matt Unsworth (Happy Together, Heist Podcast) as we first recollect how scary the demons were for us as kids (7:22). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with all things Whoopi (12:14). We all debate whether it’s worth going crazy for Swayze (18:09), Mike praises the logic of the supernatural plot (28:23), and Unsworth explains why he loves the ending and its possible larger ramifications (38:12). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how tonally disjointed it feels throughout (41:06), Pops gets pissed about the rules of being a ghost (44:50), and we wonder if this entire movie runs only on star power (49:45). Finally, after a historic deadlock, Mike on Much co-host and Arkells front man Max Kerman drops in to cast the deciding vote (1:03:22).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tjeqtz/10_06_19_The_Pedestal_ep13_Ghost.mp3" length="154402508" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re hungry for your touch with the 1990 Patrick Swayze romantic thriller GHOST.
 
We’re joined by our very first guest, Hollywood screenwriter Matt Unsworth (Happy Together, Heist Podcast) as we first recollect how scary the demons were for us as kids (7:22). We then begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with all things Whoopi (12:14). We all debate whether it’s worth going crazy for Swayze (18:09), Mike praises the logic of the supernatural plot (28:23), and Unsworth explains why he loves the ending and its possible larger ramifications (38:12). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with how tonally disjointed it feels throughout (41:06), Pops gets pissed about the rules of being a ghost (44:50), and we wonder if this entire movie runs only on star power (49:45). Finally, after a historic deadlock, Mike on Much co-host and Arkells front man Max Kerman drops in to cast the deciding vote (1:03:22).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3860</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (EP12)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad! (EP12)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-naked-gun-from-the-files-of-police-squad-ep12/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/the-naked-gun-from-the-files-of-police-squad-ep12/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:19:33 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/the-naked-gun-from-the-files-of-police-squad-ep12-beb71675b14054cfb0dfb4c93c9d16b3</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we just got our beavers stuffed with the 1988 Leslie Neilson screwball comedy THE NAKED GUN: FROM THE FILES OF POLICE SQUAD!</p>
<p>
 After reminiscing over the days of VHS vs Beta (4:08), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Pops lauding its use of constant little jokes over the big ones (7:12). We dive into the continuing comedic brilliance of Leslie Neilson (19:19), delve into our favorite scenes from Weird Al to the baseball game finale (24:30), and Mike admires how well the movie “keeps the farts hot” (32:14). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the inevitable debate about OJ Simpson (42:44). Shane takes issue with the ratio of bad to good jokes (48:23), we talk about why Ricardo Montalban may be the movie’s weakest link (51:11), and how the Queen plot severely dates the whole thing (55:26).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we just got our beavers stuffed with the 1988 Leslie Neilson screwball comedy THE NAKED GUN: FROM THE FILES OF POLICE SQUAD!</p>
<p><br>
 After reminiscing over the days of VHS vs Beta (4:08), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Pops lauding its use of constant little jokes over the big ones (7:12). We dive into the continuing comedic brilliance of Leslie Neilson (19:19), delve into our favorite scenes from Weird Al to the baseball game finale (24:30), and Mike admires how well the movie “keeps the farts hot” (32:14). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the inevitable debate about OJ Simpson (42:44). Shane takes issue with the ratio of bad to good jokes (48:23), we talk about why Ricardo Montalban may be the movie’s weakest link (51:11), and how the Queen plot severely dates the whole thing (55:26).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/me75zw/30_05_19_Pedestal_Ep_12_Naked_Gun.mp3" length="59093615" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we just got our beavers stuffed with the 1988 Leslie Neilson screwball comedy THE NAKED GUN: FROM THE FILES OF POLICE SQUAD!
 After reminiscing over the days of VHS vs Beta (4:08), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Pops lauding its use of constant little jokes over the big ones (7:12). We dive into the continuing comedic brilliance of Leslie Neilson (19:19), delve into our favorite scenes from Weird Al to the baseball game finale (24:30), and Mike admires how well the movie “keeps the farts hot” (32:14). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the inevitable debate about OJ Simpson (42:44). Shane takes issue with the ratio of bad to good jokes (48:23), we talk about why Ricardo Montalban may be the movie’s weakest link (51:11), and how the Queen plot severely dates the whole thing (55:26).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3693</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (EP11)</title>
        <itunes:title>Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (EP11)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-ep11/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-ep11/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 09:18:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-ep11-e3ded45ec6d8196033ea50566c1f417b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of season two, we strike hard and fade away with the 1990 radical action classic TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After sharing the different impacts karate class had on our childhoods (5:24) and who our favorite Ninja Turtle was (8:50), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the look of the turtles themselves have held up over the years (13:10). We debate Casey Jones’ claustrophobic joke (23:44), we gush over the movie’s use of flashbacks (33:13), and examine some of the bold artistic choices made in a kid’s action movie (39:43). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the things that bothered us about Shredder (45:47) and that punk kid Danny (48:10). Pops dives into the issues with the movie’s pro-vigilantism (52:37) and Shane asks the question we’ve all pondered for years: “Are the turtles sexual beings?” (1:05:55)</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first episode of season two, we strike hard and fade away with the 1990 radical action classic TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After sharing the different impacts karate class had on our childhoods (5:24) and who our favorite Ninja Turtle was (8:50), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the look of the turtles themselves have held up over the years (13:10). We debate Casey Jones’ claustrophobic joke (23:44), we gush over the movie’s use of flashbacks (33:13), and examine some of the bold artistic choices made in a kid’s action movie (39:43). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the things that bothered us about Shredder (45:47) and that punk kid Danny (48:10). Pops dives into the issues with the movie’s pro-vigilantism (52:37) and Shane asks the question we’ve all pondered for years: “Are the turtles sexual beings?” (1:05:55)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/uwgfpd/10_06_19_The_Pedestal_ep11_Ninja_Turtles.mp3" length="176387060" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the first episode of season two, we strike hard and fade away with the 1990 radical action classic TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES.
 
After sharing the different impacts karate class had on our childhoods (5:24) and who our favorite Ninja Turtle was (8:50), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the look of the turtles themselves have held up over the years (13:10). We debate Casey Jones’ claustrophobic joke (23:44), we gush over the movie’s use of flashbacks (33:13), and examine some of the bold artistic choices made in a kid’s action movie (39:43). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with all the things that bothered us about Shredder (45:47) and that punk kid Danny (48:10). Pops dives into the issues with the movie’s pro-vigilantism (52:37) and Shane asks the question we’ve all pondered for years: “Are the turtles sexual beings?” (1:05:55)]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4409</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Jaws (EP10)</title>
        <itunes:title>Jaws (EP10)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-10-jaws/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-10-jaws/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-10-jaws-5b19d76aac7ed482bdc97c89cb4809c1</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In the final episode of season one, we get you the head, the tail, the whole damn thing with the 1975 Spielberg thriller JAWS.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Mike divulges his childhood obsession with sharks (7:26), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the carnage and violence still hold up (9:49). We get into the Indianapolis monologue (15:50), the legendary John Williams score (20:14) and delve into why Richard Dreyfus’ performance was so good (27:56). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with ways we’d bring down the film’s bloated length (32:57). We talk about the flaws in the third act quest to kill the shark (38:48), Robert Shaw’s over-acting (42:56), and Shane compares Jaws to a regular season baseball game (48:24). We end with an epic throw down between Mike and Pops over the antagonists both in Jaws and in the movie Interstellar (50:24).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final episode of season one, we get you the head, the tail, the whole damn thing with the 1975 Spielberg thriller JAWS.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Mike divulges his childhood obsession with sharks (7:26), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the carnage and violence still hold up (9:49). We get into the Indianapolis monologue (15:50), the legendary John Williams score (20:14) and delve into why Richard Dreyfus’ performance was so good (27:56). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with ways we’d bring down the film’s bloated length (32:57). We talk about the flaws in the third act quest to kill the shark (38:48), Robert Shaw’s over-acting (42:56), and Shane compares Jaws to a regular season baseball game (48:24). We end with an epic throw down between Mike and Pops over the antagonists both in Jaws and in the movie Interstellar (50:24).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/wkvsm8/Pedestal_EP10_Jaws_original.mp3" length="57768389" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In the final episode of season one, we get you the head, the tail, the whole damn thing with the 1975 Spielberg thriller JAWS.
 
After Mike divulges his childhood obsession with sharks (7:26), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well the carnage and violence still hold up (9:49). We get into the Indianapolis monologue (15:50), the legendary John Williams score (20:14) and delve into why Richard Dreyfus’ performance was so good (27:56). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with ways we’d bring down the film’s bloated length (32:57). We talk about the flaws in the third act quest to kill the shark (38:48), Robert Shaw’s over-acting (42:56), and Shane compares Jaws to a regular season baseball game (48:24). We end with an epic throw down between Mike and Pops over the antagonists both in Jaws and in the movie Interstellar (50:24).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3610</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Airplane! (EP09)</title>
        <itunes:title>Airplane! (EP09)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-9-airplane/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-9-airplane/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:54:34 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-9-airplane-6f4151d5cb77e2629c26e8b3e4a5f1e0</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we picked the wrong week to quit drinking with the 1980 Zucker Brothers comedy AIRPLANE!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane reveals Airplane’s connection to the movie Ghost (6:42), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well it exploited dramatic dignified actors for extremely ridiculous roles (10:46). We talk about how many modern jokes have been harvested from this film (15:25), the underrated genius of Robert Stack (20:01), and the emergence of Leslie Neilson as a comedy legend (27:47). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Airplane’s overreliance on stereotypes (31:01). We debate whether or not Captain Oveur is actually a pedophile (38:13), Mike defends his position on the guitar scene (40:42), and we get into why the flashbacks were potentially the movie’s weakest links (45:16).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we picked the wrong week to quit drinking with the 1980 Zucker Brothers comedy AIRPLANE!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane reveals Airplane’s connection to the movie Ghost (6:42), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well it exploited dramatic dignified actors for extremely ridiculous roles (10:46). We talk about how many modern jokes have been harvested from this film (15:25), the underrated genius of Robert Stack (20:01), and the emergence of Leslie Neilson as a comedy legend (27:47). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Airplane’s overreliance on stereotypes (31:01). We debate whether or not Captain Oveur is actually a pedophile (38:13), Mike defends his position on the guitar scene (40:42), and we get into why the flashbacks were potentially the movie’s weakest links (45:16).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/ikvi8z/Pedestal_EP9_Airplane_original.mp3" length="53032937" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we picked the wrong week to quit drinking with the 1980 Zucker Brothers comedy AIRPLANE!
 
After Shane reveals Airplane’s connection to the movie Ghost (6:42), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how well it exploited dramatic dignified actors for extremely ridiculous roles (10:46). We talk about how many modern jokes have been harvested from this film (15:25), the underrated genius of Robert Stack (20:01), and the emergence of Leslie Neilson as a comedy legend (27:47). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Airplane’s overreliance on stereotypes (31:01). We debate whether or not Captain Oveur is actually a pedophile (38:13), Mike defends his position on the guitar scene (40:42), and we get into why the flashbacks were potentially the movie’s weakest links (45:16).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3314</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Full Metal Jacket (EP08)</title>
        <itunes:title>Full Metal Jacket (EP08)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-8-full-metal-jacket/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-8-full-metal-jacket/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-8-full-metal-jacket-9b1ae34a16f671567ba35718ce29dc9f</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we've gotta try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over with the 1987 Kubrick war drama FULL METAL JACKET.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After quibbling over how to pronounce Kubrick’s name (4:46), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the heavy contrasts between Joker and Gomer Pyle (12:00). We get into why the drill sergeant was both a hilarious and heady character (20:35), how the concept of “war” was the true villain of Full Metal Jacket (24:15), and talk about the cultural impact of “Me So Horny” (29:02). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the how the sniper reveal doesn’t hold up (41:13). We discuss the over-saturation of Vietnam War films at the time (42:57), whether or not the film’s second half is more educational than entertaining (45:43), and why the movie’s look wasn’t able to elevate its battle scenes (49:45).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode we've gotta try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over with the 1987 Kubrick war drama FULL METAL JACKET.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After quibbling over how to pronounce Kubrick’s name (4:46), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the heavy contrasts between Joker and Gomer Pyle (12:00). We get into why the drill sergeant was both a hilarious and heady character (20:35), how the concept of “war” was the true villain of Full Metal Jacket (24:15), and talk about the cultural impact of “Me So Horny” (29:02). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the how the sniper reveal doesn’t hold up (41:13). We discuss the over-saturation of Vietnam War films at the time (42:57), whether or not the film’s second half is more educational than entertaining (45:43), and why the movie’s look wasn’t able to elevate its battle scenes (49:45).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tqiztc/Pedestal_EP8_Full_Metal_Jacket.mp3" length="145817696" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode we've gotta try to keep our heads until this peace craze blows over with the 1987 Kubrick war drama FULL METAL JACKET.
 
After quibbling over how to pronounce Kubrick’s name (4:46), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the heavy contrasts between Joker and Gomer Pyle (12:00). We get into why the drill sergeant was both a hilarious and heady character (20:35), how the concept of “war” was the true villain of Full Metal Jacket (24:15), and talk about the cultural impact of “Me So Horny” (29:02). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the how the sniper reveal doesn’t hold up (41:13). We discuss the over-saturation of Vietnam War films at the time (42:57), whether or not the film’s second half is more educational than entertaining (45:43), and why the movie’s look wasn’t able to elevate its battle scenes (49:45).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3645</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Coming to America (EP07)</title>
        <itunes:title>Coming to America (EP07)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-7-coming-to-america/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-7-coming-to-america/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:49:16 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-7-coming-to-america-b76329cd9aee5c945431017b9333f375</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re your queen to be with the 1988 John Landis comedy COMING TO AMERICA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane explains how the movie’s royal bath affected him as a youth (1:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the many different characters that Eddie Murphy was able to pull off (9:26). We discuss the classic matrimony song (12:15), why Coming to America’s impact goes beyond its gags (16:51), and how one scene clearly inspired Kanye West (18:34). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the problems with Sexual Chocolate’s Randy Watson (31:13) and why Lisa put up with Daryl (35:44). We get into the nightclub dating montage (39:28), all the jokes involving McDowell’s restaurant (41:53), and Shane nitpicks the final wedding scene (45:22).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re your queen to be with the 1988 John Landis comedy COMING TO AMERICA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane explains how the movie’s royal bath affected him as a youth (1:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the many different characters that Eddie Murphy was able to pull off (9:26). We discuss the classic matrimony song (12:15), why Coming to America’s impact goes beyond its gags (16:51), and how one scene clearly inspired Kanye West (18:34). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the problems with Sexual Chocolate’s Randy Watson (31:13) and why Lisa put up with Daryl (35:44). We get into the nightclub dating montage (39:28), all the jokes involving McDowell’s restaurant (41:53), and Shane nitpicks the final wedding scene (45:22).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/akcc4i/Pedestal_EP7_Coming_to_America_original.mp3" length="123559616" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re your queen to be with the 1988 John Landis comedy COMING TO AMERICA.
 
After Shane explains how the movie’s royal bath affected him as a youth (1:23), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the many different characters that Eddie Murphy was able to pull off (9:26). We discuss the classic matrimony song (12:15), why Coming to America’s impact goes beyond its gags (16:51), and how one scene clearly inspired Kanye West (18:34). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the problems with Sexual Chocolate’s Randy Watson (31:13) and why Lisa put up with Daryl (35:44). We get into the nightclub dating montage (39:28), all the jokes involving McDowell’s restaurant (41:53), and Shane nitpicks the final wedding scene (45:22).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3088</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Garden State (EP06)</title>
        <itunes:title>Garden State (EP06)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-5-garden-state/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-5-garden-state/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:46:54 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-5-garden-state-c3c25edac9ca6d79373259932f0c2e38</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re exploring the infinite abyss with the 2003 Zach Braff indie darling GARDEN STATE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops admits he stole from it back when he was a film student (4:22), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a pre-Big Bang Theory Jim Parsons (9:07). We discuss the famous soundtrack (15:46), why the movie helped us understand our younger selves (19:31), and get into how Peter Sarsgaard and Jean Smart elevated their characters (25:39). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Natalie Portman as the original Manic Pixie Dream Girl (31:11) and Braff’s wildly erratic performance (33:22). We examine Method Man’s peep show hotel  (39:18), continue down into the quarry (41:33), and wonder why we should be caring about Largeman’s problems at all (51:53).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re exploring the infinite abyss with the 2003 Zach Braff indie darling GARDEN STATE.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Pops admits he stole from it back when he was a film student (4:22), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a pre-Big Bang Theory Jim Parsons (9:07). We discuss the famous soundtrack (15:46), why the movie helped us understand our younger selves (19:31), and get into how Peter Sarsgaard and Jean Smart elevated their characters (25:39). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Natalie Portman as the original Manic Pixie Dream Girl (31:11) and Braff’s wildly erratic performance (33:22). We examine Method Man’s peep show hotel  (39:18), continue down into the quarry (41:33), and wonder why we should be caring about Largeman’s problems at all (51:53).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/baggfx/Pedestal_EP6_Garden_State.mp3" length="58207073" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re exploring the infinite abyss with the 2003 Zach Braff indie darling GARDEN STATE.
 
After Pops admits he stole from it back when he was a film student (4:22), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with a pre-Big Bang Theory Jim Parsons (9:07). We discuss the famous soundtrack (15:46), why the movie helped us understand our younger selves (19:31), and get into how Peter Sarsgaard and Jean Smart elevated their characters (25:39). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Natalie Portman as the original Manic Pixie Dream Girl (31:11) and Braff’s wildly erratic performance (33:22). We examine Method Man’s peep show hotel  (39:18), continue down into the quarry (41:33), and wonder why we should be caring about Largeman’s problems at all (51:53).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3637</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Space Jam (EP05)</title>
        <itunes:title>Space Jam (EP05)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-5-space-jam/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-5-space-jam/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:45:21 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-5-space-jam-d3126be3c383b04a24e294a1bdad582c</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re not white, we’re clear with the 1997 Michael Jordan/Bugs Bunny team up SPACE JAM.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane and Pops differ in opinion on the Looney Tunes (2:44), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie stayed true to the legend of Jordan (8:25). Mike stands up for Babs Bunny (14:23), we all praise everything that is Bill Murray (17:10), and discuss the degree of difficulty MJ had to act in a movie like this (25:07). Shane and Mike lock horns over Ray Allen’s performance in He Got Game (27:58) and we then move on to the case for knocking Space Jam off the pedestal with Pops taking issue with the portrayal of the toons (32:15). We examine the movie’s other NBA stars (36:49), the film’s inherent corporate cynicism (41:30), and why the actual basketball scenes didn’t work (42:32).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re not white, we’re clear with the 1997 Michael Jordan/Bugs Bunny team up SPACE JAM.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane and Pops differ in opinion on the Looney Tunes (2:44), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie stayed true to the legend of Jordan (8:25). Mike stands up for Babs Bunny (14:23), we all praise everything that is Bill Murray (17:10), and discuss the degree of difficulty MJ had to act in a movie like this (25:07). Shane and Mike lock horns over Ray Allen’s performance in He Got Game (27:58) and we then move on to the case for knocking Space Jam off the pedestal with Pops taking issue with the portrayal of the toons (32:15). We examine the movie’s other NBA stars (36:49), the film’s inherent corporate cynicism (41:30), and why the actual basketball scenes didn’t work (42:32).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/6dcguh/Pedestal_EP5_Space_Jam_original.mp3" length="52033388" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re not white, we’re clear with the 1997 Michael Jordan/Bugs Bunny team up SPACE JAM.
 
After Shane and Pops differ in opinion on the Looney Tunes (2:44), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with how the movie stayed true to the legend of Jordan (8:25). Mike stands up for Babs Bunny (14:23), we all praise everything that is Bill Murray (17:10), and discuss the degree of difficulty MJ had to act in a movie like this (25:07). Shane and Mike lock horns over Ray Allen’s performance in He Got Game (27:58) and we then move on to the case for knocking Space Jam off the pedestal with Pops taking issue with the portrayal of the toons (32:15). We examine the movie’s other NBA stars (36:49), the film’s inherent corporate cynicism (41:30), and why the actual basketball scenes didn’t work (42:32).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3252</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Goldfinger (EP04)</title>
        <itunes:title>Goldfinger (EP04)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-4-goldfinger/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-4-goldfinger/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:43:36 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-4-goldfinger-3b652058a824fc758ac7019830a2c799</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re shaken but not stirred with the 1964 James Bond classic GOLDFINGER.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane kicks things off with his love for the game Goldeneye and his disdain for Daniel Craig (3:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with why Sean Connery might be the best Bond ever (7:16). We discuss how Goldfinger works as a satire of male culture in the 60s (12:49), and why Pops thinks both Odd Job (15:37) and Bond’s Aston Martin (20:49) are awesome. We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s overt and borderline embarrassing misogyny (23:18). We wonder whether or not Bond hates the Beatles (29:55), examine the myriad problems with the ending (36:34) and Shane struggles to wrap his head around why Bond movies are so popular (42:14).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re shaken but not stirred with the 1964 James Bond classic GOLDFINGER.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After Shane kicks things off with his love for the game Goldeneye and his disdain for Daniel Craig (3:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with why Sean Connery might be the best Bond ever (7:16). We discuss how Goldfinger works as a satire of male culture in the 60s (12:49), and why Pops thinks both Odd Job (15:37) and Bond’s Aston Martin (20:49) are awesome. We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s overt and borderline embarrassing misogyny (23:18). We wonder whether or not Bond hates the Beatles (29:55), examine the myriad problems with the ending (36:34) and Shane struggles to wrap his head around why Bond movies are so popular (42:14).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/inn7i4/Pedestal_EP4_Goldfinger_original.mp3" length="48735752" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re shaken but not stirred with the 1964 James Bond classic GOLDFINGER.
 
After Shane kicks things off with his love for the game Goldeneye and his disdain for Daniel Craig (3:13), we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with why Sean Connery might be the best Bond ever (7:16). We discuss how Goldfinger works as a satire of male culture in the 60s (12:49), and why Pops thinks both Odd Job (15:37) and Bond’s Aston Martin (20:49) are awesome. We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with the movie’s overt and borderline embarrassing misogyny (23:18). We wonder whether or not Bond hates the Beatles (29:55), examine the myriad problems with the ending (36:34) and Shane struggles to wrap his head around why Bond movies are so popular (42:14).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3045</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Blair Witch Project (EP03)</title>
        <itunes:title>The Blair Witch Project (EP03)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-3-the-blair-witch-project/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-3-the-blair-witch-project/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:37:37 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-3-the-blair-witch-project-041298b04534fab49f3f4d84dafade57</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re afraid to close our eyes and afraid to open them with the 1999 ultra-indie horror THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After debating the validity of the movie’s extremely low budget (2:21) we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the authenticity of all the performances (15:12) and how Blair Witch Project’s “found footage” format still holds up (22:27). We’re then split three ways on which lead each of us liked the most (27:18). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Pops first confusing the hell out of Shane with his “Late 90s Ennui” movie theory (32:21). We then get into which parts elicited more groans than scares (45:12), the inconsistent reactions throughout the film (48:47), and argue over whether or not Heather is one of the most annoying movie characters of all time (51:46).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re afraid to close our eyes and afraid to open them with the 1999 ultra-indie horror THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>After debating the validity of the movie’s extremely low budget (2:21) we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the authenticity of all the performances (15:12) and how Blair Witch Project’s “found footage” format still holds up (22:27). We’re then split three ways on which lead each of us liked the most (27:18). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Pops first confusing the hell out of Shane with his “Late 90s Ennui” movie theory (32:21). We then get into which parts elicited more groans than scares (45:12), the inconsistent reactions throughout the film (48:47), and argue over whether or not Heather is one of the most annoying movie characters of all time (51:46).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/qysaxe/Pedestal_EP3_Blair_Witch_REV_original.mp3" length="160768820" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re afraid to close our eyes and afraid to open them with the 1999 ultra-indie horror THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT.
 
After debating the validity of the movie’s extremely low budget (2:21) we begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with the authenticity of all the performances (15:12) and how Blair Witch Project’s “found footage” format still holds up (22:27). We’re then split three ways on which lead each of us liked the most (27:18). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Pops first confusing the hell out of Shane with his “Late 90s Ennui” movie theory (32:21). We then get into which parts elicited more groans than scares (45:12), the inconsistent reactions throughout the film (48:47), and argue over whether or not Heather is one of the most annoying movie characters of all time (51:46).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4019</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Dumb &amp;amp; Dumber (EP02)</title>
        <itunes:title>Dumb &amp;amp; Dumber (EP02)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-2-dumb-dumber/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-2-dumb-dumber/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:33:08 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-2-dumb-dumber-a43c5900897dda02df3f33e89e55e0c1</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re telling you there’s a chance with the 1994 Farrelly Brothers comedy DUMB & DUMBER.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Jim Carrey’s powerhouse comedic performance (6:22), and whether or not Jeff Daniels may have actually outshined him (13:21). Shane explains how Lloyd’s dream sequence changed his life (18:51) and Pops takes a stand on the merits of the film’s ending (21:46). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with all the “annoying humour” (26:37) and then how the added scenes in the unrated version reveal some of Dumb & Dumber’s biggest flaws (28:00). We get into the piss drinking cop (32:47), Pops blows Shane’s mind with a huge plot hole (36:06), and we explore why Seabass hasn’t aged well (42:49).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we’re telling you there’s a chance with the 1994 Farrelly Brothers comedy DUMB & DUMBER.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Jim Carrey’s powerhouse comedic performance (6:22), and whether or not Jeff Daniels may have actually outshined him (13:21). Shane explains how Lloyd’s dream sequence changed his life (18:51) and Pops takes a stand on the merits of the film’s ending (21:46). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with all the “annoying humour” (26:37) and then how the added scenes in the unrated version reveal some of Dumb & Dumber’s biggest flaws (28:00). We get into the piss drinking cop (32:47), Pops blows Shane’s mind with a huge plot hole (36:06), and we explore why Seabass hasn’t aged well (42:49).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/3ek2wn/Pedestal_EP2_Dumb_and_Dumber_original.mp3" length="53475791" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, we’re telling you there’s a chance with the 1994 Farrelly Brothers comedy DUMB & DUMBER.
 
We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal with Jim Carrey’s powerhouse comedic performance (6:22), and whether or not Jeff Daniels may have actually outshined him (13:21). Shane explains how Lloyd’s dream sequence changed his life (18:51) and Pops takes a stand on the merits of the film’s ending (21:46). We move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal with Mike taking issue with all the “annoying humour” (26:37) and then how the added scenes in the unrated version reveal some of Dumb & Dumber’s biggest flaws (28:00). We get into the piss drinking cop (32:47), Pops blows Shane’s mind with a huge plot hole (36:06), and we explore why Seabass hasn’t aged well (42:49).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3342</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (EP01)</title>
        <itunes:title>Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (EP01)</itunes:title>
        <link>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-1-star-trek-iv-the-voyage-home/</link>
                    <comments>https://thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/e/episode-1-star-trek-iv-the-voyage-home/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:04:43 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">thepedestalpodcast.podbean.com/episode-1-star-trek-iv-the-voyage-home-dbbb832f16fabfbbb720dd0db7b7fbc3</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In our very first episode, we only work in outer space with the 1986 Leonard Nimoy directed sci fi flick STAR TREK IV: THE VOYAGE HOME. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>After a quick rundown of why we wanted to make this podcast in the first place (2:23), we first lay out our varying levels of fandom for the Star Trek universe, or “Trekker-ness” (6:30). We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal by diving into Star Trek IV’s sense of humor (10:03). We talk about what Shatner brings to Captain Kirk (18:43), how the special effects have held up (24:33) and which member of Starfleet stole the show (32:50). We then move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal starting with Shane’s problems first with the probe (34:55) and then the whales (43:37). Pops takes issue with the love interest (52:00) and we all debate Chekov and his “nuclear wessels” (54:55).</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our very first episode, we only work in outer space with the 1986 Leonard Nimoy directed sci fi flick STAR TREK IV: THE VOYAGE HOME. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>After a quick rundown of why we wanted to make this podcast in the first place (2:23), we first lay out our varying levels of fandom for the Star Trek universe, or “Trekker-ness” (6:30). We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal by diving into Star Trek IV’s sense of humor (10:03). We talk about what Shatner brings to Captain Kirk (18:43), how the special effects have held up (24:33) and which member of Starfleet stole the show (32:50). We then move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal starting with Shane’s problems first with the probe (34:55) and then the whales (43:37). Pops takes issue with the love interest (52:00) and we all debate Chekov and his “nuclear wessels” (54:55).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/uyebpb/Pedestal_EP1_Star_Trek_IV_original.mp3" length="62897072" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In our very first episode, we only work in outer space with the 1986 Leonard Nimoy directed sci fi flick STAR TREK IV: THE VOYAGE HOME. 
 
After a quick rundown of why we wanted to make this podcast in the first place (2:23), we first lay out our varying levels of fandom for the Star Trek universe, or “Trekker-ness” (6:30). We begin the case for keeping it on the pedestal by diving into Star Trek IV’s sense of humor (10:03). We talk about what Shatner brings to Captain Kirk (18:43), how the special effects have held up (24:33) and which member of Starfleet stole the show (32:50). We then move on to the case for knocking it off the pedestal starting with Shane’s problems first with the probe (34:55) and then the whales (43:37). Pops takes issue with the love interest (52:00) and we all debate Chekov and his “nuclear wessels” (54:55).]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Much Studios</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>true</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3931</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
</channel>
</rss>
