Kenney reflected on how he has changed. He said, "GDP growth...is not a metric of human happiness or fulfillment or necessarily a health society."

Let me know what you think!

AI Chapters:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews former Alberta Premier and longtime federal minister Jason Kenney about what makes Canada and Alberta distinctive, arguing Canada remains highly desirable globally despite recent stagnation, affordability issues, national unity strains, and a “wrecked” immigration system under Trudeau. Kenney describes prairie resilience and communitarianism shaped by harsh geography, recounts a COVID-era near-default and a bank CEO’s praise for Alberta’s unique entrepreneurial risk-taking culture, and critiques right-of-centre politics that reduce human flourishing to GDP growth. He rejects Alberta separatism as grievance-driven compared with Quebec’s cultural nationalism, defends Canada’s pluralistic British-French institutional inheritance, warns that high immigration and modern media can slow integration, and urges relearning Canadian history and resisting a demoralizing “Gramscian” cultural project. On Trump and tariffs, he stresses national solidarity, doubts durable deals, supports firmness and retaliation, and suggests tabling a modest energy export tax as leverage.

00:00 Alberta Risk Culture

01:38 Show Intro and Guest

04:09 How Canada Is Doing

08:04 Prairie Optimism Roots

09:58 COVID Oil Crash Story

13:13 Land Shapes Community

15:54 Chesterton and Settlers

20:11 Beyond GDP Politics

25:16 Canada as a Nation

35:06 Culture After Empire

41:44 Trump Tariffs Strategy

48:36 Wrap Up and Thanks

Nisbet offers the best and most readable resources for thinking about community from a non-Left perspective. 

Prof. Luke Sheahan wrote the forward to a re-release of Nisbet's Social Philosophers. The book is more like a review of intellectual history through the social lens of community. 

Check out Dr. Sheahan's website to learn more about his work, articles, and published material.

Thanks again for checking this out!

Shawn

AI summary and chapters:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews political scientist Luke Sheahan about Robert Nisbet’s thought and Sheahan’s foreword to the re-release of Nisbet’s The Social Philosophers: Community and Conflict in Western Thought. Sheahan describes Nisbet as a major 20th-century conservative whose The Quest for Community argued that modern state power erodes the authority of families, churches, and voluntary associations, producing alienation and instability. They discuss Nisbet’s “idea-systems” of community and his typology of military, political, religious, withdrawal, revolutionary, and plural communities, with the plural community linked to the American constitutional order and multiple overlapping authorities. The conversation addresses legitimacy versus raw power, authority’s dependence on local institutions, the role of political theology, and how weakening intermediate communities contributes to loneliness, deaths of despair, and ideological movements.

00:00 State Power and Alienation

00:33 Meet Luke Sheahan

01:29 Who Was Robert Nisbet

03:17 Quest for Community Thesis

04:07 National We-ness Critique

06:02 Social Philosophers and Ideas

08:05 Reprinting the Lost Book

10:09 Three Core Communities

11:32 Military to Political Shift

13:33 Religious Community Rise

15:12 Withdrawal Communities

16:55 Revolutionary Community

19:59 Plural Community Vision

22:13 Pluralism and Authority

24:43 Protestant vs Catholic Order

29:15 Community Beyond Protestantism

29:51 Legitimacy From Local Ties

31:58 Alienation And Mass Society

36:41 Authority Versus Power

41:19 Prejudgments And Liberal Crisis

45:22 Do Ideas Shape History

54:37 Social Health Versus State Power

58:19 Rebuilding Associations Closing

Post-liberalism has been around since the 1980s in theology and at least since the 1990s in politics. It only became popular in the 2010s.

Conservatives need to go deep into post-liberal thought. We need to know what bits align with intellectual conservatism and what elements of post-liberalism may never fit. We need to understand the elements of policy that might flow from different branches of post-liberalism. We can't simply dismiss it as nothing but collectivism. 

Dr. James Wood is a professor of religion and theology at Redeemer University (Ontario Canada) with a deep interest and understanding of post-liberalism. 

The article we discuss isn't posted online yet. I will endeavour to add a link when it's available.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks again

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Professor James Wood about his review of Stefan Borg’s book The Return of the Common Good and the wider post-liberal conversation. Wood recounts how his Christian conversion, dissatisfaction with market logic in finance, and early moral concerns (including abortion) led him to critiques of liberal atomistic individualism and liberal “neutrality.” He traces post-liberal roots to 1980s–90s communitarianism (e.g., Sandel, MacIntyre, Taylor), post-liberal theology influenced by Barth (Frei, Lindbeck), and figures like Milbank and Hauerwas, and distinguishes British from contemporary American post-liberal currents (national populists, common-good conservatives, integralists). The discussion argues liberalism tends toward autonomy maximization, depends on pre-liberal virtues it can’t sustain (the Böckenförde dilemma), and treats liberalism as a political theology and “prodigal child” of Christendom, with Wood emphasizing an ecclesiocentric, church-centered post-liberalism.

00:00 Liberalism And Autonomy

01:01 Episode Setup And Stakes

01:52 Guest Introduction

03:12 Wood’s Postliberal Journey

07:10 Communitarians And Radical Orthodoxy

11:58 Postliberal Theology Roots

16:16 Milbank And Hauerwas Bridge

20:50 Barth And Political Theology

25:15 British Vs American Postliberalism

30:36 Common Good Debates

34:26 Liberalism and Common Good

35:33 State Power and Virtue

36:42 Shared Logos and Dilemma

39:55 Desire and Modernity

44:24 Liberal Separations Critique

48:24 Neutral State Myth

55:12 Heresy and Freedom

01:00:38 Post Liberal Revolutions

01:02:52 Church and Politics Finale

Conservatives have been telling us to wake up decades before anyone had heard of being woke. 

But Randell doesn't offer the same old, dour observations. He confronts the most dire predictions, then he gets to work trying to rescue Western civilization from itself.

Danny Randell gives me hope. He is part of a new, young cohort of conservative builders and thinkers. Please consider subscribing to his Foundations Forum and check out some of his writing below.

And let me know what you think! 

Thanks again,

Shawn

Western Civilization is Already Dead

In Search of the Public Houses

Against John Stuart Mill

Chapters and AI summary:

Shawn Whatley interviews Danny Randell, a doctoral student in intellectual history at the University of Buckingham and managing director of Foundations Forum, about his claim that “Western civilization is already dead,” arguing that the inherited norms and mores many associate with the West—often remembered as strong in the 1990s—no longer exist in the same form amid rapid cultural change, crime, altered education, and declining affordability. Randell outlines his PhD research on the shift from religious toleration to secular pluralism in Britain and Canada, discusses how axiomatic ideas can drive secularization, and explores breaks from tradition since the 1960s, including the sexual revolution and family breakdown. They debate liberalism, John Stuart Mill, neutrality and the state, factionalism, and civic education, and conclude with Randall’s call for communal “public houses” and his Foundations Forum newsletter and events aimed at recovering Western intellectual, spiritual, and cultural heritage.

00:00 Western Civilization Dead

00:41 Meet Danny Randell

01:33 PhD Secular Pluralism

03:22 Axioms Drive Secularization

04:28 Trends Advertising Fashion

06:09 Why The West Feels Gone

09:36 Nineties Politics Shift

10:54 History Connection Breaks

14:37 Twentieth Century Upheaval

20:30 Freedom Discipline Debate

23:51 Mill Debating Club Rules

27:45 Athens Meets Jerusalem

30:25 Beyond Law and Property

31:08 Hobbes and New Leviathans

32:59 Civic Education and State Role

34:30 Myth of Neutral State

38:39 Conflict and Strongmen

40:14 Factionalism and Shared Good

42:59 Disagree Better in Politics

45:50 Public Houses and Community

52:35 Foundations Forum Mission

57:23 Subscribe and Closing

Sound familiar?

We need to pay attention to other countries, especially those in Europe. A similar process is happening in North America. There's no reason, yet, to see why we don't end up in the same place.

Dr. Nathan Pinkoski has spent years studying French and Anglo-American political thought. This is his third book translated from French into English, and he offers insights you won't get from other sources.  

Check out Zemmour's The Suicide of France: The Quiet Revolution That Destroyed a Nation

And let me know what you think -- thanks again!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Nathan Pinkoski about his English translation of Éric Zemmour’s 2014 bestseller The Suicide of France, a 140,000-word political nonfiction “literary event” that sold 500,000 copies in months and helped set the stage for Zemmour’s 2022 presidential run. Pinkoski explains Zemmour’s method of “deconstructing the deconstructors” through 42 episodic vignettes that flip post–May 1968 progressive “moments of progress” into accounts of national decline, rooted in an elite revolt against de Gaulle’s legacy. They discuss why this style fits France’s more unified literary/TV culture, contrast it with North America’s fragmented narratives, and compare it to works like Allan Bloom and Christopher Caldwell. The conversation covers shifts in capitalism, class, feminism, judicial activism, laïcité, the EU as a neoliberal borderless project, loss of political control, and Zemmour’s call for the West to recover Greco-Roman and Christian roots.

00:00 Zemmour Book Phenomenon

01:35 Meet the Guest

03:54 Breaking French Progressivism

07:46 Why It Became a Bestseller

10:33 Could It Work in America

16:54 Events Ideas Method

21:46 EU Neoliberal Dream

33:29 America and French Mimicry

40:19 Laicite vs Religious Freedom

45:52 Universalism and Western Roots

55:48 Closing Thanks

Goldberg has been a keen observer of conservative politics for nearly four decades. You might say he was the voice of Republicanism in America before President Donald Trump. He thinks deeply, reads widely, and is willing to change his mind.

Don't miss this episode withJonah Goldberg, witty, thoughtful, and entertaining as always.

From his website:

"Jonah Goldberg is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute where he holds the Asness Chair in Applied Liberty. In 2019, he left National Review magazine after a 21-year stint to cofound The Dispatch, where he is Editor-in-Chief. He has been a weekly columnist for the Los Angeles Times since 2005 and a nationally syndicated columnist since 2000. He hosts the popular podcast The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg.

His syndicated column appears regularly in many of America’s leading newspapers. His first book, Liberal Fascism, was a #1 New York Times and Amazon bestseller and was selected as the #1 history book of 2008 by Amazon readers. His second book, The Tyranny of Clichés, was also an instant bestseller and hailed as perhaps “the best and most fun-to-read primer on the tenets of conservative politics since P. J. O’Rourke’s Parliament of Whores.”

His most recent book, Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy, was also a New York Times bestseller in 2018."

Thanks for checking this out!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Jonah Goldberg clarifies his consistent dislike of populism while distinguishing between necessary elites and irresponsible or hypocritical ones. He argues conservatism is rooted in prudence, trade-offs, and Burkean skepticism of one-size-fits-all principles, warning that ideologies claiming all good things align invite authoritarianism. Goldberg critiques technocracy and “value-neutral” pragmatism as rhetorical games used to short-circuit debate, linking moral-equivalent-of-war politics from Wilson through the New Deal to modern progressivism. He explains his idea that “complexity is a subsidy,” rewarding those with cognitive, financial, and social capital and fueling resentment. In discussing Suicide of the West, he argues capitalism, democracy, and rights are “unnatural” historical achievements deserving gratitude. He condemns Trump-era right-wing dishonesty, audience capture, and the erosion of character standards, and briefly addresses Canada’s politics and Trump’s treatment of Canada.

00:00 Populism and Elites

00:58 Poverty Wealth and Complexity

02:52 Trump and Character Test

03:21 Conservatism and Contradiction

05:42 Fusionism Tradeoffs and Prudence

08:51 One Thingism and Triage

13:46 Liberal Fascism Cover Controversy

16:42 New Right and Illiberal Turn

23:10 State Cannot Love You

23:45 Microcosm vs Macrocosm

32:42 Complexity as Subsidy Revisited

36:54 Tyranny of Cliches and Values

38:18 Values in Government

39:05 Liberal vs Progressive Labels

41:30 Word Games and Cliches

43:57 Pragmatism and Technocracy

48:47 Crisis Politics and War

51:12 New Deal as Mobilization

53:09 Elitism vs Populism

56:26 Tea Party Lessons

58:47 Defining Elite and Oligarchy

01:04:34 Institutions and Staying Lanes

01:06:21 Unnatural Miracle of Modernity

01:12:05 Hockey Stick Prosperity

01:14:49 French vs English State

01:15:32 Straussian Theology Questions

01:16:29 God And Rights

01:18:29 Locke And Liberal Origins

01:22:59 Culture Over Intellectuals

01:24:41 Ideas Lag Reality

01:28:44 Trump And Right Wing Capture

01:38:00 Power Corrupts Intellectuals

01:42:47 Canada And Trump Fallout

01:46:13 Closing Thanks

Dimpee Brar and Matt Spoke invest a ton of their own time and resources into saving Canada from Leftist nonsense. They aren't just offering opinions devoid of effort.

Is patriotism a 'conservative value' that demands devotion to Canada, even when Canada is ignoble?

Should we defend the prime minister, because his office deserves respect?

Do separatists deserve an audience, or should we denounce them outright?

The Canadian non-Left is a coalition. It includes people with major differences in opinion. It's what makes the Right more exciting than the Left, in my opinion.

Brar and Spoke offer attractive examples of the best in the conservative movement in Canada. Make sure you check out their other work too!

A Grateful Canadian's Love Letter to America, by Dimpee Brar

Country Before Party, by Matt Spoke

Let me know what you think!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley moderates a discussion with Dimpee Brar and Matt Spoke about whether opposing Prime Minister Mark Carney can be patriotic, how Canadian conservatives should balance “country before party,” and why anti-Americanism is a weak basis for national unity. Brar argues Western patriotism rests on truth, justice, and reason, claims the Liberal project has dethroned reason in favor of resentment, and contends Carney lacks loyalty and has stoked anti-American sentiment while being trapped by it in trade talks; she favors deeper Canada–U.S. alignment and views Trump as a model for pushing back against leftism and relativism. Spoke agrees it’s patriotic to fight flawed domestic leadership but urges a united international posture, rejects both anti-American tactics and separatist/annexation talk, and says Trump widened what conservatives can openly address while warning against importing Trump as Canada’s template.

00:00 Patriotism and Carney

00:26 Country Before Party

02:17 Western Patriotism Explained

03:46 Welcome and Guests

05:07 Twitter Spat Origins

08:47 Truth Above Nation

11:49 Matt’s Loyalty Argument

18:00 Principles Versus Interests

19:29 Carney and Trade Deal Doubts

25:47 Is Anti Carney Patriotic

29:45 Anti Americanism and Annexation Talk

33:24 Who Belongs in the Right

34:59 Conservatism vs Separatism

36:34 Country Before Ideology

37:57 Hyphenated Conservatism Debate

39:23 Relativism and Trump Model

46:29 Can Trump Save Canada

47:42 Overton Window and Leadership

53:11 Trump Space to Build

01:01:11 Outsiders and Patriot Fight

01:03:59 Socrates and Common Good

01:06:38 Coalition Closing Thanks

Reno is also articulate on post-liberalism. It's not the simplistic idea you see dismissed in most of the legacy media. We also touch on secularism, and I tried to get him to use the contrast between Catholic and Protestant political theology to explain the issues in Quebec over Bill 21. He's too smart and didn't take the bait.

I hope you enjoy this one. Let me know what you think!

Thanks again

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Rusty Reno, editor of First Things and author of Return of the Strong Gods (2019; updated 2021), on how liberalism struggles to generate solidarity amid a “meta-crisis” of disintegration. Reno explains his critique of the postwar “open society” consensus shaped by Popper and Hayek and unpacks “neoliberalism” as a left-right, technocratic, globalization-era economic and cultural project that promoted openness, porous borders, and creative destruction, helping set the stage for populist backlash where immigration fuses economic and cultural concerns. They discuss universalism vs particularism, the “order of loves,” and why civic loyalty and a “pre-political we” matter for freedom. The conversation also addresses post-liberalism’s varieties, liberalism’s limits, and Quebec’s laïcité/Bill 21 tensions in a multicultural society.

00:00 Liberalism Lacks Solidarity

00:52 Meet Rusty Reno

01:16 Episode Roadmap

03:45 Rock Climbing Icebreaker

05:13 Introducing Strong Gods

07:04 Praise Words And God Terms

10:07 Neoliberalism And Weakening

15:42 Populism And Open Society

21:47 Universalism Versus Particularism

27:01 Political We And Self Interest

32:39 Crisis Of Disintegration

33:41 Canada And Multicultural Identity

34:34 Freedom and Solidarity

36:07 Critiques of Liberal Mind

37:28 Defining Post Liberalism

38:43 Post Liberal Theology Roots

42:55 Liberalism Not Enough

43:50 War Immigration Nationalism

46:45 Totalitarianism Debate

48:43 Quebec Bill 21 Laicite

55:10 Multiculturalism Managed Diversity

59:41 Republican We and Civic Virtue

01:02:04 Platonism and Real Nations

01:06:38 Metaphysical Density and Youth

01:10:34 Closing Thoughts and Farewell

A few hightlights:

1. French republicanism carries markedly different presuppositions than English liberal traditions.

2. We cannot ignore the political differences the follow from a Catholic vs Protestant starting point.

3. Language matters, e.g., freedom of conscience implies freedom to think as one sees fit, in French, and it means freedom on understanding of moral issues, in an Anglo-American tradition.

4. Why is Bill 21, Quebec's so-called secularism bill, so interesting today, when it wouldn't have been conceived in the 1960s?

Tons of essential political concepts in this episode!

Tell me what you think. I hope you get a chance to listen and check out the whole Nation and the Veil series.

Thanks for listening!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Lisa Richmond (VP of Research at Cardus) about Cardus’s four-part audio documentary, "The Nation and the Veil: Quebec’s Struggle with Secularism and Religion," created over three years with Jean-Christophe Jasmyn and Étienne-Alexandre Beauregard to help English and French Canadians better understand Quebec and Bill 21. Richmond explains laïcité as a state-religion framework grounded in four principles: separation of church and state, equality of citizens, freedom of religion, and state religious neutrality. They compare Anglo-American liberalism and French republicanism, discuss how Protestant and Catholic histories shape fears of state vs religious power, trace Quebec’s church-state history through the Quebec Act and the Quiet Revolution, and explore why secularism and pluralism have become defining political questions alongside sovereignty, including differences in how “conscience” is understood in French and English.

00:00 Why Quebec Secularism Matters

03:04 Welcome and Episode Overview

05:17 Inside the Audio Documentary

09:42 Defining Laïcité

13:07 French Republican vs Anglo Liberal

21:19 Locke Rousseau and Minorities

26:38 Catholic vs Protestant Secular Fears

37:48 How Quebec Became Catholic State

42:47 Church Runs Society

43:46 Governance Vacuum After Conquest

45:48 Church Role Reconsidered

47:26 Common Law Versus Civil

49:41 Great Darkness Explained

51:23 Quiet Revolution Reframed

55:11 Laïcité Political Flip 58:23 Bear Pelt Metaphor

01:03:14 Secularism Versus Sovereignty

01:09:40 Conscience And Common Good

01:17:44 Canada Two Solitudes

01:24:16 Closing Plug And Thanks

Canada, especially, has pretended that demography and assimilation don't matter. All that matters is world-leading levels of immigration.

Dr. Eric Kaufmann is another refreshing academic who speaks plainly, and he has suffered for it.

We discuss Toward and Ethical Populism, an article he recently published in First Things. 

And we dig into two of his books:

The Third Awokening: A 12-point plan for rolling back progressive extremism

White Shift: Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities

I shortened my comments at the start; trying something different.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks for checking it out

Shawn

Chapters and AI Summary:

Shawn interviews political scientist Eric Kaufmann about his article “Toward Ethical Populism,” arguing the post-Trump right should combine disruption of ideologically captured institutions with Scrutonian respect for norms and due process. Kaufmann discusses his book The Third Awokening, defining “woke” as sacralizing marginalized identity groups and pursuing equal outcomes, which he says harms merit, authenticity, free speech, and national cohesion through measures like affirmative action, DEI, and historical revisionism. He contends Canada is especially susceptible due to moralistic universalism and weak historical attachments, with multiculturalism and political correctness as precursors to woke extremism. Kaufmann defends government action against private censorship in universities and corporations, urges organized lobbying and education reform, and in White Shift argues demographic change drives populism, assimilation is slow, and high immigration—especially in Canada—should be slowed.

00:00 Cancellation And Merit

02:58 Meet Eric Kaufmann

03:55 Ethical Populism Explained

07:43 Foxes Versus Lions

10:39 Deculturation And Woke

16:02 Academic Backlash Story

21:18 Canada And Moralism

28:09 Why Government Must Act

35:40 Private Censorship Lock In

39:05 Common Ground Conservatism

39:32 Free Speech Fabric

40:35 Leviathan Debate

45:13 Ethical Populism Rules

46:50 Twelve Point Blueprint

50:09 Education Culture War

53:34 Canada Identity Crisis

57:36 Multiculturalism Origins

01:04:53 Populism Demography Data

01:08:05 Liberal Ethnicity Future

01:13:30 Fertility Reality Check

01:18:39 Closing Thanks

Dimpee Brar has entered the scene in high gear. Over the last few months she has written provocative pieces at a rate of roughly one every two weeks. She's been on panels, podcasts, and interviews. I hope she can maintain her output!

A few of her articles include:

Why Islam seeks shelter under the banner of the Left. The Federalist

A NATO that doesn't support U.S. action shouldn't exist. The Federalist

Churches are burning, and the the lie fuelling it still holds. The Daily Wire

Western Civilization is under siege in Canada, activist warns. National Post

Blood & soil vs post-nationalism misses Canada's real identity. Western Standard

The tide is turning, and old ideas are resurfacing in the mainstream. 

Let me know what you think of this episode!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI Summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Diimpee Brar, Director of Engagement at Allies for a Strong Canada and a prolific columnist, about defending Western civilization and Canada’s founding principles. Brar describes moving from studying neuroscience to the humanities, encountering what she calls nihilism in academia, and being “redeemed” by Allan Bloom’s The Closing of the American Mind, which led her to political philosophy and Leo Strauss. She defines nihilism as meaninglessness and argues that modern democratic decline expresses itself as relativism, erasing distinctions between good and bad and enabling fanatics to rule, particularly in Canada. The conversation covers liberalism versus conservatism, the friend–enemy distinction, and Brar’s view of the 1839 Durham Report as a founding document emphasizing one nation and assimilation through education. They also discuss Islam and the “Red-Green” alliance, and end with Brar identifying Nietzsche as a dangerous thinker and noting debates about Strauss, Judaism, and atheism.

00:00 Mission to Defend the West

01:19 Meet Dimpee Brar

03:40 Why She Entered Politics

05:59 From Neuroscience to Humanities

07:24 Bloom and Strauss Awakening

09:09 What Nihilism Means

10:55 Relativism and Fanatics

12:30 Where She Fits Ideologically

17:39 Friends and Enemies Debate

21:36 Durham Report and Assimilation

28:39 Liberalism Then and Now

31:35 Tolerance and Islam Question

34:49 Is Liberalism Too Thin

37:28 Is Liberalism Still Real

38:53 Natural Rights vs Identity Rights

40:56 Debate as a Sign of Life

43:09 Red Green Alliance Explained

45:40 Islam and Liberal Blind Spots

49:35 Auxiliary Militia and Iran Warning

52:34 Women Freedom and Defense

56:19 Nietzsche and Relativist Language

01:01:20 Strauss Judaism and Revelation

01:04:58 Straussians Political Theology Wrap

01:11:25 Final Thanks and Farewell

Durable civilizations choose both.

Harold Innis was a giant in Canadian academia in the early 20th century, but most people have never heard of him. He offers deep and helpful insights on civilization, progress, and culture. Professor John Bonnett wrote his thesis on Innis and introduces us to his work.

We discuss a draft article Bonnett has written on Innis. Once it's published, I'll try to update this with a link.

Thanks for checking this out!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

The host interviews Brock University professor and Innis scholar John Bonnett about an upcoming article arguing that conservatives are renewing a focus on culture as essential to Canadian national cohesion, especially as digital technology and AI disrupt society much like the printing press did. Bonnett explains Harold Innis’s importance to Canadian thought (influencing McLuhan and praised by George Grant), his “staples” analysis of Canada’s development, and his communication theory that technologies shape cognition and impose costs. Drawing on Innis, they discuss historical anxieties about new media, the dangers of information overload destabilizing politics, and “monopolies of knowledge” created by space- or time-biased media that can trap cultures and reduce innovation. Bonnett outlines adaptations—expressive and cognitive diversity, combinatorial thinking, democratizing cultural institutions like the Canada Council, and using digital/augmented-reality landscape art to renew culture.

00:00 Why Culture Matters

01:19 Meet Professor Bonnett

05:00 Which Conservatives

08:08 Why Innis Matters

13:17 Where To Start Reading

16:05 This Happened Before

22:07 Too Much Information

26:02 Monopoly Of Knowledge

33:41 Three Ways To Adapt

40:42 Democratizing Culture Policy

48:14 Digital Landscapes Project

57:17 Conservatism And Social Glue

01:00:11 Closing Thoughts And Thanks

As Interim Executive Director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, Van Geyn has the deep knowledge and experience required to explain the essential elements of free expression in a short book titled, Maple's Garden: A Canadian Freedom of Speech Story.

We also discuss her other books, Pandemic Panic, and Free Speech in Canada.

Thanks for checking this out!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Shawn Whatley interviews Christine Van Geyn, interim executive director of the Canadian Constitution Foundation, about her children’s picture book Maple’s Garden, inspired by the Mississauga case involving Wolf Ruck and Ontario rulings that a naturalized garden can be protected expression reflecting subjective views of beauty. They discuss how governments and bylaws can overreach by enforcing aesthetic standards, the difference between harmful invasive or dangerous plants and taste-based complaints, and why free expression protects disagreement. Van Geyn also explains her co-authored book Pandemic Panic as a documented record of civil liberties impacts, cases, and “memory-holed” incidents from COVID-19, including the Freedom Convoy and the Emergencies Act challenge. The conversation ends with a primer on Charter Section 2(b), Section 1’s Oakes test, and concerns about human rights tribunals being used to penalize speech, citing cases in BC and Ontario’s Emo flag dispute.

00:00 Parents vs State Power

00:36 Why Free Speech Matters

01:30 Meet Christine Van Geyn

04:20 Why She Wrote Maples Garden

06:23 The Garden Case Explained

09:43 Kids And The Hidden Animals

11:37 Beauty Versus Weeds Debate

18:53 Invasive Plants And Real Harm

21:25 Where The State Draws The Line

29:33 Teaching Beauty Without Force

30:46 Kids and Creativity

31:29 Who Decides Beauty

33:03 What Is Beauty

34:25 Why This Kids Book

37:56 Illustrator and AI Art

41:14 Pandemic Panic Overview

42:59 Recording Pandemic Abuses

46:44 Charter and Human Rights

48:43 Oakes Test Explained

52:00 Human Rights Overreach Cases

01:01:08 Forced Endorsement by Tribunal

01:05:34 Defending Disagreement

01:08:43 Closing and Call to Action

Josh Lewis has been wrestling with this, and many other issues, for the last 9 years on his podcast, Saving Elephants. He's hosted many of the biggest influencers in American conservatism, including a number of voices from Canada and Europe.

The conservative movement is a jigsaw puzzle. Conservatives need to distinguish themselves from all the factions on the Left, while also retaining the distinct shapes of each puzzle piece. For conservatives, this is a conversation without end. If we grow tired of it, the coalition will fracture.

Of course, we can't talk about American politics without talking about Trump -- plenty of that in this episode too.

Thanks so much for checking this out! Let me know what you think.

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary: 

In the 100th episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley welcomes back Josh Lewis, founder of the Saving Elephants podcast, to discuss the coalitional nature of American (and Canadian) conservatism and how to handle disagreements within the movement. Lewis outlines enduring conservative factions—libertarians, traditionalists, and anti-communists—while exploring the rise and uncertainty of NatCon and post-liberal currents, Trump’s role as both aberration and lasting influence, and what Trump reveals about leadership, courage, and cultural “rot.” They also talk about why Lewis chose podcasting, where millennials and younger generations get information, how “bridge” institutions translate ideas, and competence as a key voter demand. The conversation culminates in proposed bright lines between liberalism and conservatism and reflections on how to appropriately mark America’s 250th anniversary.

00:00 Can Ideas Fix Politics

00:22 Episode 100 Welcome

02:06 Conservatism Is A Coalition

02:53 Nash Three Legged Stool

04:47 NatCon Moment And Trump

09:20 Avoiding Sectarian Purges

10:25 Handling The Crazy Uncle

13:49 Why Josh Chose Podcasting

18:34 Millennials News Habits

23:51 Scaling Ideas Beyond Nerds

29:42 Why I Stay Calm

31:02 What Voters Want

32:57 Competence Before Culture

34:35 Populism Versus Leadership

35:34 Trumpism After Trump

39:09 Courage And Character

42:16 Integrity And White Collar Crime

43:24 Ideas Versus Reality

45:22 Liberalism And Conservatism

50:36 Freedom Has A Purpose

54:48 America At 250

58:01 How To Celebrate A Nation

59:40 Closing Thanks

Mitchell says conservatives have done a good job at addressing the debt and tradition economies. We are strong on fiscal policy, and we stand up for the debts we owe to our fathers. But we are almost completely blind to the more profound, urgent, and critical debt of guilt. Conservatives are blind to spiritual debt.

The Left understands guilt and spiritual debt. It's their main focus. Criticize them for having bad data or for emotionalizing things, but the Left addresses an inescapable issue that the Right seems to miss entirely.

I'd love to hear what you think of this episode. It's deep in places but also pointed and provocative.

Thanks again for listening!

Shawn

Links:

American Awakening

https://americanreformer.org/2026/03/whither-the-reformation-in-america/

Chapters and AI summary:

Shawn Whatley interviews Georgetown political theorist Joshua Mitchell about his book American Awakening: Identity Politics and Other Afflictions of Our Time and his article on the Reformation in America. Mitchell argues the West’s turmoil is fundamentally a religious crisis, with identity politics functioning as a quasi-Christian, “incomplete religion” seeking purity and redemption without a Christian solution. He contrasts a “regime of competence” with a post-1989 suspension of history, critiques the feminization of public life as mercy detached from justice, and outlines three “economies” humans inhabit: payment, tradition, and spiritual debt. He contends conservatives focus on the first two while lacking language for the third, leaving the left to politicize guilt, stain, and redemption. Mitchell offers three futures—endless incomplete religions, Nietzschean rejection of Christian categories, or a return to Christianity—and emphasizes America’s covenantal Protestant imagination as key to overcoming identity politics.

00:00 Religious Crisis Frame

00:34 Show Intro Guest Setup

02:05 Is Woke Dead

03:02 Competence After 1989

04:53 Mercy Justice Feminization

07:09 Manliness Debate

09:20 Incomplete Religions Thesis

14:24 Nietzsche Tocqueville Futures

19:20 Three Economies Explained

24:00 Identity Politics As Religion

27:09 Tocqueville Self Interest

33:04 America Protestant Catholic Moment

34:53 Covenantal America Returns

35:56 Protestant Revival Warning

37:41 Host Rapid Fire Topics

41:16 Burke Simplicity Trap

43:37 Purity Stain Politics

47:43 Spiritual Economy Turn

50:20 Religion That Fits

55:00 France Religion Showdown

58:51 Aristotle Versus Plato

01:02:47 Covenant Beyond Nietzsche

01:03:45 Next Book Farewell

Corey offers a thick view of intellectual conservatism. She invites us into something challenging and deep. 

I tried to push her on whether she was asking too much. Was her approach practicable? Should we never ever fight? What role does conflict play in a conservative philosophy?

Professor Corey does not shy from these issues. She sees them as real questions for her students, but also in her own life.

Let me know what you think of this episode! Thanks so much for checking it out.

Shawn

Links:

https://lawliberty.org/podcast/conservatisms-lamentable-drift/

https://lawliberty.org/a-quiet-refusal-to-compromise/

Beautiful Losers

https://essays.quotidiana.org/hazlitt/pleasure_of_hating/

Michael Oakeshott on Religion, Aesthetics, and Politics

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley welcomes Baylor University honors program director and political science professor Elizabeth Corey to discuss her concerns that modern conservatism has become increasingly adversarial, reducing politics to winners and losers and neglecting culture, education, and the “realm of experience” beyond the friends-enemies dichotomy. Drawing on thinkers such as Oakeshott, Scruton, Pieper, Kirk, and Aristotle, Corey argues for understanding tradition as learned “practices” and for balancing the active and contemplative lives, resisting the urge to instrumentalize knowledge. They address internal conservative pluralism and the Philadelphia Society’s big-tent approach, the role of humility and charity in debate, and Corey’s reading of Laura Field’s Furious Minds on MAGA-linked institutions like Hillsdale and Claremont. Corey also discusses Hazlitt’s “pleasure of hating,” her First Things piece on admiring, and her forthcoming book The Heart of Learning.

00:00 Modern Conservatism as Battle

00:31 Meet Professor Elizabeth Corey

04:18 A Drift Toward Conflict

10:07 Hot Button Politics vs Real Life

12:03 Is Culture Enough

14:51 Tradition as Practices

20:54 Active Life vs Contemplation

26:29 Oakeshott on History and Modes

29:37 Defining Conservatism Today

33:25 Big Tent Debates and Economics

36:14 Life Beyond Economics

37:01 Avoiding Sectarian Right

39:04 Humility and Big Tent

41:02 Pluralist Conservative Case

44:32 Do Ideologies Still Matter

48:24 Furious Minds and MAGA

50:46 Hillsdale and Claremont

54:21 Pleasure of Hating

58:52 Heart of Learning

01:02:24 Can Admiration Survive

This caught me off guard. I thought Tim was simply an exemplary leader of a noteworthy organization. I had no idea that he was also personally up to his neck in litigation about the legitimacy of race-based scholarship.

You won't meet a nicer, more thoughtful guy. Tim goes out of his way to ring-fence his own case from the organization he represents. You need to know about the Runnymede Society. The Society appears even more worth, and necessary, when you hear about Tim's case, at the end of the episode.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks again

Shawn

Chapters and AI Summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Tim Haggstrom, National Director of the Runnymede Society, about whether freedom of speech exists in Canadian law schools and how students learn “no-go zones” on contentious issues. Hagstrom explains Runnymede’s founding in 2016 amid concerns about insufficient debate over constitutional change, citing the Supreme Court’s 2015 Saskatchewan Federation of Labour decision on a Charter right to strike, and outlines the Society’s mission to promote constitutionalism, the rule of law, and fundamental freedoms through debates it does not adjudicate. They discuss taboo topics, civil discourse, and competing views of the rule of law, interpretation, legal neutrality, and substantive equality (including the 2020 Fraser case). Hagstrom then recounts his personal judicial review against the University of Saskatchewan after being found guilty of non-academic misconduct following letters defending dialogue and critiquing race-based policies, linking the dispute to university commitments to decolonization and anti-racism training.

00:00 Free Speech in Law School

00:22 Meet Tim Haggstrom

04:23 Why Runnymede Started

07:10 Tim’s Path to Runnymede

09:47 Campus No Go Zones

13:42 Staying Relevant and Civil

16:28 Sacred Cows Debate Example

19:05 Tim’s Lawsuit Teaser

21:53 Why Institutions Matter

25:24 Network Formation and Skills

31:03 Rule of Law Explained

37:26 Law Without Translation

38:53 Bridge Norms Example

41:33 Courts Versus Legislatures

44:13 Thick Rule of Law

45:57 Rodriguez To Carter

48:46 Living Tree Origins

50:19 Can Law Be Neutral

51:09 Substantive Equality Debate

56:05 Runnymede Student Plug

56:59 Saskatchewan Case Begins

01:05:41 Critical Social Justice Claims

01:10:11 Campus Speech Outlook

01:13:09 Protect Legal Tradition

In the meantime, I offer a recap of liberalism and contrast it with conservatism. I also touch on inheritance, myth, and experience as themes within conservatism.

I also tackle a summary of neoconservatism. Neocons remain the main opinion shapers on the non-left in Canada. Their eminence has waned in America, but it remains strong in Canada.

We end with a review of upcoming guests.

Looking forward to hearing what you think!

Thanks again

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley shares a scheduling update amid a busy summer and looks ahead to the podcast’s 100th episode, then continues his effort to define conservatism by contrasting it with liberalism. He critiques George Grant’s thin definition of liberalism and Grant’s claim about the impossibility of political conservatism, and instead uses Fukuyama/John Gray’s four-part account of liberalism (individualism, egalitarianism, universalism, meliorism) to frame key conservative objections: the involuntary obligations of life (especially family), equality before law alongside excellence, particularism over universal political templates, and prudential skepticism about reform. He adds conservative emphases on inheritance, regional myth/self-understanding, and shared experience. He then outlines three waves of neoconservatism—its origins, post–Cold War central-planning and interventionist tendencies, and a 2016-era “never-Trump” internationalist turn—before previewing upcoming guests Josh Mitchell, Tim Hagstrom, and Elizabeth Corey.

00:00 Big Questions Intro

00:14 Podcast Schedule Update

01:26 Defining Liberalism

04:56 Fukuyama Four Pillars

06:54 Conservative Pushback

10:45 Tradition Myth Place

13:51 Thin vs Thick Politics

14:58 Neoconservatism Origins

17:04 Second Wave Neocons

20:53 Third Wave Never Trump

22:41 Guests and Wrap Up

We discuss civics education and whether there's an increased appetite for first principles.

Thanks for checking this out!

I look forward to your comments.

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Jodi Bruhn about renewed interest in first principles, civics, and regime analysis in her University of Lethbridge courses, contrasting first-year and fourth-year students’ ability to identify clashing political principles behind current events. They discuss political science versus political philosophy, including critiques of Straussian textualism, and consider thinkers such as Aristotle, Voegelin, Bergson, and Carl Schmitt. Bruhn warns that the Supreme Court of Canada hearing cases involving the notwithstanding clause signals a misunderstanding of legislative supremacy and could provoke a political showdown with provinces like Quebec and Alberta, potentially risking Canada’s dissolution. They examine constitutional change constraints, separatism’s uncertain outcomes, leadership and ethical decay under unwritten constitutional conventions, demagoguery, and Bruhn’s account of Tamara Lich’s University of Calgary talk about the trucker convoy.

00:00 Supreme Court Warning

00:52 Meet the Guest

02:52 Teaching First Principles

05:26 Civics and Regimes

07:37 Political Science vs Philosophy

15:31 Teasing Out Principles

18:03 Notwithstanding Clause Clash

21:14 Charter and Judicial Review

23:34 Can Canada Rewind

25:26 Alberta Separation Scenarios

28:41 Schmitt and Conflict Horizon

29:57 Friendship Course Spectrum

31:29 Canadian Founding Enmities

33:27 Hooker and English Middle Way

35:42 Ideology and First Principles

37:31 Alberta Separation and Reconfederation

39:47 Constitutional Mismatch and Corruption

44:51 Demagoguery and Vital Breakthrough

47:33 Reading Bergson and Courage

49:10 Tamara Lich at University

51:11 Teaching Critical Thinking Finale

Professor Flanagan has taught a generation of political science students at the University of Calgary. He's informed so much of what the Right assumes in Canada. He's generous, thoughtful, and resists capture into a neat, political box.

Books mentioned:

Grave Error: How The Media Misled Us (and the Truth about Residential Schools)

Dead Wrong: How Canada Got the Residential School Story So Wrong

Articles mentioned:

Settler-Neoliberalism: Tom Flanagan and Friedrich Hayek on the Prairies | Canadian Historical Review

Let me know what you think!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews political scientist Tom Flanagan about Friedrich Hayek, focusing on spontaneous order versus top-down organization and the state’s proper role in enforcing rules without directing outcomes. Flanagan explains spontaneous order through examples like language, markets, common law, and even skiing etiquette, and argues modern governments often create chaos by trying to control systems such as Canadian healthcare through price and quantity setting, producing persistent shortages and waitlists. The conversation explores Hayek’s assumptions about property, justice as a feature of fair process and intention rather than outcomes, and practical questions about unintended consequences in politics. Flanagan also discusses Canada’s formation through sovereignty claims, treaties, and force, defending treaty-making as broadly just for its time. He contrasts Hayek’s limits on “spiritual problems” with Voegelin’s strengths and notes he is not an Alberta separatist.

00:00 Hayek In A Nutshell

01:00 Show Intro And Guest

04:56 Flanagan Meets Hayek

06:08 Spontaneous Order Explained

07:02 Language As Emergence

09:50 Markets And Simple Rules

11:55 State Control And Healthcare

16:55 Ski Hill Rules And Enforcement

22:20 Property Justice And Tradition

27:49 Colonialism And Civilizing Mission

30:28 International Anarchy And Empire

35:40 Treaties and Education

36:51 Hayek Order vs Organization

38:16 Canada Built by Force

39:22 Morris and Prairie Treaties

42:03 Mirage of Social Justice

47:55 Intentions vs Outcomes

49:29 Weber and Policy Consequences

56:17 Hayek Meets Voegelin

01:03:13 Spiritual Pathology Politics

01:04:46 State Supports Spontaneous Order

01:08:28 Alberta Separatism and Wrap

In spite of powerful reasons to be upset, he still thinks Alberta should stay.

The rest of Canada isn't paying enough attention to this. Alberta separation wouldn't be an issue if Canada was well governed. It will continue to be an issue until our governance is fixed.

Here's the article we discuss: An argument for Canada from an Alberta conservative.

Thanks for listening! 

Let me know what you think.

Chapters and AI summary:

Alberta Separatism Debate: Evan Menzies’ Argument for Staying in Canada Host Shawn Whatley interviews Evan Menzies, VP at Crestview Strategy and former Wildrose/UCP staffer, about his Substack article “An Argument for Canada from an Alberta Conservative” and the rise of Alberta separatism. Menzies explains why many Alberta conservatives feel exhausted and unheard—citing issues like equalization, Senate and House of Commons representation, pipeline barriers, and judicial “constitutional adventurism” (including MAID, mandatory minimums, and debates over the notwithstanding clause). He argues separatism is a risky, non-conservative “tear down to the studs” revolution that promises a utopia while forcing Alberta to rebuild institutions and constitutional order from scratch. Instead, he urges reform within Canada, appeals to patriotism and gratitude, warns against victimhood politics, and predicts Alberta’s growing demographic and economic weight will keep shifting Canada’s power westward.

00:00 Alberta Separation Stakes

01:07 Show Setup and Guest Intro

05:05 Why Albertans Feel Exhausted

08:02 Who Supports Leaving

11:50 Senate Imbalance Debate

15:40 House Seats and Time Zones

18:21 Equalization and Quebec Hydro

20:43 Courts and Constitutional Drift

25:04 Charter Pragmatism vs Principle

28:03 Why Stay In Canada

28:35 Three Reasons To Stay

31:05 Blank Slate Constitution Risks

33:04 Revolution Not Devolution

35:41 Communicating Conservatism Again

39:26 Patriotism Over Victimhood

45:05 Gratitude And National Story

49:39 Alberta Story Is Canadian

51:28 Make The 21st Century Canada

51:59 Closing Thanks And Moral Ground

Our conversation tackled technology, ethics, and humanity in professional education. How we can keep clinicians human and prevent them from becoming robots?

Although we situate the conversation in the health sciences, the concepts apply to every corner of society: engineering, finance, public policy, and more. 

Dr. Moyse has had some success in helping students see beyond the materialist reductionism of modern science. His work offers hope for other fields.

Let me know what you think in the comments!

Thanks for listening.

Shawn

Book mentioned:

The Art of Living for a Technological Age

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Ashley Moyse, associate professor of bioethics at Baylor University, about how technology, markets, and policy language reshape medicine and moral life. Moyse traces his path from neurophysiology and cancer-clinic work to theology and bioethics, including training in Australia and Oxford and creating the Columbia Character Cooperatives to form medical students through virtue-based practices. They critique the market metaphor of “provider,” arguing it distorts the clinician–patient relationship and turns people into producers and consumers of information. Moyse explains his book The Art of Living for a Technological Age and “techno-ontology,” expanding technology beyond devices to include moral and political techniques, and challenges Beauchamp and Childress’ four-principles framework as flattening ethics into efficient tools rather than lived moral struggle, formation, and attention over time.

00:00 Patients Not Data

00:45 Meet Dr Ashley Moyse

05:35 From Neurophysiology To Theology

08:39 Oxford Columbia Baylor Path

13:49 Techno Ontology Explained

14:54 Tools Beyond Gadgets

25:21 Four Principles Under Fire

32:55 Ethics As Struggle

33:46 Medicine as Craft

37:15 Virtue in Clinical Risk

39:19 Ethics Beyond Principles

43:05 Provider Language Critique

47:04 Metrics and Managerialism

49:53 Mentoring Against Positivism

58:32 Phenomenology in Practice

01:03:16 Technology as Principality

01:09:55 Closing Reflections

The current Supreme Court hearings last week are pouring fuel on the Alberta separatist movement. The Mark Carney Liberals are intervenors on the SCC hearing about Quebec's Bill 21 and use of the notwithstanding clause (s.33). Carney is asking the Supreme Court to do an end-run around the constitution bypassing the amending formula.

Regardless of how the court rules, the fact that it had the gall to hear the case fuels Alberta's frustrations. 

We do discuss Dr. Rowley's insights on political theology, but most of our time focussed on the revolutionary nature of the SCC this week.

Please let me know what you think!

Thanks for listening,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Matthew Rowley about the Supreme Court of Canada hearing Quebec’s Bill 21 and whether limits can be placed on the Charter’s notwithstanding clause (s.33), which Rowley argues would further politicize the Court and trigger a constitutional crisis. They discuss federal intervention, the Charter’s impact on legislative supremacy, court power, secularism, and how differing regional cultures and views of government fuel Alberta’s separatist momentum. Rowley contrasts Alberta’s self-reliant ethos with Eastern Canada’s greater trust in government, critiques legal instrumentalism and the loss of duties tied to rights, and emphasizes internal justice and external defense as core governmental roles. The conversation also addresses political theology, the foundations of Western civilization, declining legitimacy and honor in politics, and the need for deeper, honest public debate.

00:00 Charter More American

01:26 Supreme Court Showdown

02:03 Bill 21 and Section

33 06:14 Court Power Grab Fears

10:35 Alberta Separatism Case

11:54 Prairie vs East Cultures

14:05 Charter Control and Courts

17:32 Rural Life and Tools

20:09 Where Rights Come From

22:28 Rights Need Responsibilities

26:21 Too Many Laws Problem

30:38 Government Role and Good

34:27 Law as Moral Boundary

37:14 Political Theology Setup

39:37 Behavior Versus Intentions

40:15 Where Evil Really Lies

41:19 Free Church And Mainline

42:25 Faith Shown By Works

43:59 Christian Roots Of The West

45:51 Conservatism As A Living Tree

49:12 Canada Loses First Principles

51:36 State Replacing God

54:10 Legitimacy And Stoplights

55:07 Crisis Of Secular Confidence

57:43 Young People Return To God

01:00:37 Responsible Government And Honor

01:05:07 Rebuilding Ancient Paths

01:08:33 Civitas And Honest Dialogue

01:10:45 Ralph Klein And Telling Truth

01:12:30 Closing Reflections And Farewell

Should classical schools -- great books curricula -- use AI? 

I tried very hard to get Dr. Grant Havers into trouble in this episode. But he was too smart to say anything that would offend school administrators.

Instead of picking a side in the pro- vs anti-AI debate, Dr. Havers worked to bring out issues and objectives. If we trust AI to think for us, what does that say about our own ability to think?

This debate will continue to invade every knowledge-based profession over the next few years. Maybe we will all be retraining as plumbers and electricians?

Looking forward to hearing what you think!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Professor Grant Havers, chair of Philosophy at Trinity Western University and author of The Medium Is Still the Message, about AI’s role in education, especially in Great Books and classical Christian settings. Havers argues educators must study and discuss AI because media create “invisible environments” that reshape minds beyond intended uses, while warning against introducing AI into classrooms or outsourcing intellectual tasks like summarizing Plato. He questions why teachers would trust AI to write emails or handle routine work, suggesting it reflects a questionable belief that AI “thinks” better than humans, and distinguishes information processing from intelligence, intuition, and creativity. Framing AI as a new version of Plato’s cave, he calls for renewed emphasis on dialogue-based education, responsibility for beliefs, and awareness of technology’s addictive, idolatrous pull, while noting AI’s rapid real-time effects, including concerns about autonomous weapons in war.

00:00 AI in Education Today

00:42 Meet the Guest

03:22 Why Schools Want AI

05:09 Medium Shapes Minds

06:55 Outsourcing Thinking

11:02 AI as the New Cave

13:34 Mundane Tasks Debate

21:55 Addiction and Tradeoffs

23:42 Study Tech to Resist

27:02 Print Culture and Tropos

28:42 Medium Shapes the Mind

31:31 Intellectual Virtue and Soul

33:30 Left Brain Right Brain Limits

37:26 Reviving Dialogue Education

40:09 AI Empathy and Truth Seeking

43:30 Poison Books and Paradox

47:10 Idolatry Addiction and Narcissus

50:09 Hopeful Outlook and AI War

52:39 Book Wrap Up and Farewell

No one tries to provoke in order to make a point anymore. The Left still uses it all the time, but not the Right.

You cannot listen to Gottfried with modern antennae tuned to gasp at every offence. If you do, you will miss the impact of his next three punches.

I lack the courage to match Gottfried's approach. I'd like to think it's because he's old enough to not care anymore, but he was doing the same things 30 years ago. Perhaps he's spent so much time reading historical writers that he adopted their approach?

Whatever the means and ways of Dr. Gottfried, you really need to know about his thought and content. 

Books discussed:

After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State

The Essential Paul Gottfried: Essays from 1984-2024

Multiculturalism and the Politics of Guilt

Let me know what you think!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Paul Gottfried, editor-in-chief of Chronicles Magazine, about his claim that “liberal democracy” no longer exists and functions as a self-justifying label for the welfare/managerial state and its hegemonic class. Gottfried argues liberalism was a 19th-century bourgeois worldview favoring constitutional limits, civil society, markets, property, nation-states, and restricted suffrage, and that it largely died in the early 20th century as mass democracy and collectivist ideologies replaced it. He critiques Straussian influence on U.S. conservatism, rejects natural rights as a fiction rooted in communities, and disputes claims that progressivism was imported from German philosophy. Discussing Carl Schmitt, he emphasizes intensifying friend–enemy conflict and collapsing common ground, calling the U.S. Constitution’s original design effectively a “dead letter” absent a supporting cultural tropos. He also promotes Chronicles’ 50th anniversary dinner at the Willard Hotel on April 9.

00:00 Does Liberal Democracy Exist

00:43 Meet Paul Gottfried

05:30 Lukacs Quote And Thesis

07:22 Mass Democracy And Welfare State

11:06 Defining 19th Century Liberalism

13:57 Liberalism Family And Stability

17:27 Roots From Greeks To Hegel

19:45 Strauss And The Neocons

22:55 Jaffa Marini And Natural Right

26:42 Grant And Universal State

29:08 Conservatism Incorporated Critique

33:12 Provocation And Dead Letter Constitution

33:45 Constitution Under Threat

34:34 Original Design vs Judges

35:24 Tropos and Postliberal Age

36:59 Protestant Roots of Republicanism

41:38 Welfare State and State Churches

47:34 Schmitt and Friend Enemy Politics

53:24 Managerial State and Control

55:53 Universalism vs Particularism

01:01:30 Closing Reflections and Plugs

We discuss a powerful article Sam wrote titled: Toward a conservative counter-elite.

Sam's article almost has enough content to outline a whole book. He diagnosed Canada's problems, uncovers the causes, and offers a detailed list of almost a dozen solutions.

I was able to press Sam on managerialism and the tendency for Conservatives to act like Liberal professional managers when in power. This is something I haven't sorted for myself: How do we fix things without becoming managerialist ourselves?

Sam is eloquent and very good on his feet.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks so much for listening.

Shawn

Chapters and AI Summary

Host Shawn Whatley welcomes Sam Duncan, VP at Wellington Advocacy and former advisor to Doug Ford and Stephen Harper, to discuss Duncan’s article “Toward a Conservative Counter Elite.” They argue Canadian conservatism lacks an emotional narrative and compelling national story, while politics often operates as a “uniparty” with small philosophical differences under liberal frameworks. Duncan reflects on conservatives’ failure to translate electoral success into lasting policy and cultural change and calls for developing a conservative counter-elite by reforming institutions that recruit and train leaders, rather than being merely anti-elite. The conversation covers populism, the need for unifying myths after the collapse of British identity, the impact of Pierre Elliott Trudeau’s post-national multicultural vision, strengthening families and communities, the limits of managerialism, and building think tanks and long-term idea ecosystems to pressure politicians and sustain reforms.

00:00 What Conservatism Lacks

00:47 Show Intro and Guest

03:26 Why Write Counter Elite

05:42 Uniparty Explained

09:23 Populism Without Winning

12:38 Narrative Versus Demagoguery

15:56 Canada’s Missing Myth

20:25 Elites Formed Constrained Empowered

25:51 Selection and Institutional Coding

31:20 Beyond Policy Tweaks

32:12 Family First Principles

34:39 Daycare State Alternatives

36:13 Property Owning Democracy

38:01 Massey Commission Today

40:25 Building Conservative Institutions

43:34 Reforms That Stick

46:58 Politics Is Contest

49:38 Winning Versus Ideas

55:21 Managerialism And COVID

56:53 Public Service Renewal

01:02:55 Generational Conservative Shift

01:05:00 Tropos And Regime Roots

01:06:58 Closing Reflections

Professor Cooper argues that George Grant did not understand the prairie mindset. He was a Laurentian, and as such, Grant was clueless about Alberta. He reflects the Garrison mindset of the Laurentians: Alberta is a place you go to get stuff.

Cooper thinks Alberta independence is an inevitability. He cannot see any way to meld the two myths (mythoi) together. They are chalk and cheese.

We touch on education, technology, and political ideologies. Professor Cooper promotes a non-ideological stance. Perhaps in the future we can tackle whether this is even possible. It seems to assume a fact-value distinction, value relativism, which assumes what it seeks to avoid. But again, we will have to pursue this another day.

Professor Cooper points us to prairie history written by historians who actually understand the west. Stop reading only history written by Laurentians who do not understand their subject.

Barry Cooper's influence on Canadian political thought has been huge. Don't miss this episode!

Looking forward to hearing what you think.

Thanks again!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews political scientist Barry Cooper, a fourth-generation Albertan and senior fellow at the Frontier Centre, about how technology shapes consciousness (“technology is its use”), the impact of screens and AI, and why we often misunderstand technology as something we control. Cooper contrasts a Laurentian “garrison mentality” with a Western pioneer mindset, arguing that central Canada misunderstands Western Canada—a gap he says even George Grant exemplified despite Cooper’s friendly acquaintance with him. They discuss myth as a lived self-understanding, Canada’s east–west versus north–south alignments, COVID-era authoritarian responses, and Cooper’s view that Canada is not truly bilingual outside parts of Ontario and Quebec. Cooper concludes Alberta independence is “not if, but when,” unless central Canada addresses core policy grievances like pipelines and transfer payments.

00:00 Tech Shapes Us

00:34 Alberta Independence Myths

01:13 Meet Barry Cooper

05:38 George Grant And The West

08:04 Prairie Experience Vs Laurentian Vision

13:42 How Cooper Was Educated

17:15 From Farmers To Thinkers

18:40 Teaching Ideology And Wokeness

22:56 Technology Is Its Use

27:42 Myth And The West As Resource

28:57 Myth and Selfhood

31:22 Prairie Pioneer Mindset

32:56 Pipelines and Leverage

37:14 Garrison COVID Politics

40:41 Reading the West

41:56 Bilingualism Myth

47:13 Alberta Future and Independence

49:07 Beyond Left Right Labels

51:46 Local Historians and Wrap Up

Ron and I approach things from different angles, but we both try to embody the same method. Of course, his is far more honed and nuanced, educated and articulate. But I think our conversations reflect a genuine desire to understand -- attentive listening as Professor Dart calls it.

This episode gets into questions we all need to ask about Canada, what holds us together, and what is our understanding of first principles.

Please tell me what you think of it!

Thanks so much for listening.

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Professor Ron Dart about why philosophy is needed today and how Canada sought a post–World War II cultural identity through the Massey Commission (1948–1951), commissioned by Prime Minister Louis St. Laurent. They discuss the report’s emphasis on national “intangibles,” unity in the realm of ideas, and George Grant’s controversial philosophy submission, requested by his uncle Vincent Massey, which argued philosophy is not a technique but a wisdom-seeking discipline that must avoid becoming purely negative skepticism and must relate scientific and technical knowledge to moral and spiritual questions. Dart recounts Grant’s clashes with U of T’s Fulbert Anderson, Grant’s resignation from York University over curricular control, and how this led to Grant’s role in founding McMaster’s interdisciplinary Religious Studies program. They also explore contemplative vs. active life, faith as a human issue, limits of rationalism, and Sophocles’ Antigone as a warning about rigid polarization.

00:00 Why Philosophy Now

00:30 Meet Ron Dart

01:22 Massey Report Origins

03:27 Canada Identity After War

06:26 Key Massey Quotes

08:08 Visionary or Postmortem

12:12 Grant vs York University

18:28 Conscience and Aftermath

22:49 Baptists and Classics at Mac

25:19 Grant on Faith and Technique

28:03 Vita Activa vs Contemplation 3

5:40 Not Knowing and Faith

40:43 Polanyi and Tacit Knowledge

42:06 Bayes and Uncertainty

43:08 Defeasible Warrant

43:36 Nietzsche Apollo Dionysus

46:12 Limits of Rationalism

48:52 Grant and Bacon Nuance

50:25 Philosophy Not Cumulative

53:12 Against Chronological Snobbery

55:40 Catholicity of Traditions

01:00:02 Antigone and Culture Wars

01:03:28 Frozen Reason Tragedy

01:07:32 Choosing Sides Carefully

01:13:00 Aeschylus and the Enemy

01:14:52 Tightrope of Tensions

01:17:40 Concluding Reflections

Transgender medicine strikes at the core of what medicine is; at what it means to care for patients.

Should doctors do whatever patients want, or should doctors do whatever saves life and limb?

There could not be a greater debate. 

Should technology determine what we can and should do or should technology submit to something else?

Powerful, powerful discussion. 

Please take a moment to absorb it. Reflect. Tell me what you think.

Thank you so much for listening!

Shawn

https://genspect.org/international/genspect-canada/

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/shawn-whatley-doctors-have-gone-silent-on-gender-dysphoria-thats-not-good-for-patients

Chapters and AI summary:

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Mia Hughes, director of Genspect Canada, about what she calls the ideology-driven culture of gender medicine and her reporting on leaked internal WPATH communications (“WPATH files”). Hughes describes WPATH’s evolution from the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association into an activist-influenced organization, arguing its guiding principle became “de-psychopathologization,” prioritizing patient autonomy and access to hormones and surgeries over evidence and clinical safeguards. They debate medical ethics, consumerist medicine, differential diagnosis, and how harm should be defined, including comparisons to anorexia and apotemnophilia. Hughes presents her framework of transgender identification as an “extreme overvalued belief,” criticizes self-report outcomes as proof of benefit, and discusses detransition experiences. The episode ends with her account of confronting evidence-based medicine pioneer Gordon Guyatt over McMaster’s statement calling pediatric gender interventions “medically necessary.”

00:00 What Guides Gender Medicine

00:34 Meet Mia Hughes

05:52 Courage and Whistleblowing

07:14 Inside the WPATH Files

12:57 How WPATH Changed

15:19 Activism Takes Over

19:41 Devils Advocate Ethics

23:10 Overvalued Idea Theory

29:23 Contagion and Guardrails

31:52 Measuring Success and Harm

36:29 Evidence Limits and Harm Redefined

39:32 Paraphilias and Body Fixation

40:22 Patient Blackmail Ethics

41:08 Consumer Medicine Debate

43:00 Gender Care Lifesaving Claim

46:44 Liberalism Versus Medical Limits

49:57 Detransition And Overvalued Belief

54:40 Demanding Differential Diagnosis

56:46 Repathologizing And Root Causes

01:03:52 Gordon Guyatt Controversy

01:11:50 What We Missed And Wrap

This episode ran more like a visit between friends. We jumped between topics too much, laughed too much, and were probably too open about our opinions. 

In my opinion, this is precisely when magic happens.

Check out the ASU homepage.

And here's a piece John wrote for The Hub: Canada’s universities are failing to provide proper civic education. Here’s how Alberta can correct course

Thanks again for listening!

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley interviews Professor John von Heyking, now associate director and professor at Arizona State University’s School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership, about its legislature-initiated mission to address America’s civic literacy and viewpoint-diversity gaps through teaching classics (Plato, Aristotle), constitutionalism, and political history while maintaining academic freedom. They discuss differences between American and Canadian political systems, including Westminster party government, responsible government, confidence, and Bagehot’s “dignified” vs “efficient” constitution, contrasting with U.S. separation of powers and elections as key “venting points” for civic efficacy. The conversation ranges over written vs unwritten constitutional “preludes,” the Declaration’s “self-evident” truths, the moral warrant for dignity, and debates over liberalism’s meaning and origins. Von Heyking argues CBC portrayals are misleading and that America is not a fascist state, noting more Canadians move to the U.S. than vice versa.

00:00 Is America Great?

00:57 Meet John von Heyking

04:17 Inside ASU Civics School

07:50 Funding and Legislature Support

10:14 Academic Freedom and Curriculum

11:35 Student Demand and Recruiting

14:36 Wokeness and Civics Funding

19:32 Patriotism and Civic Efficacy

24:29 Bagehot and Parliament Debate

30:05 Cabinet Government Metaphors

33:18 Responsible Government Touching Power

35:57 Westminster Boot Versus Impeachment

38:14 Written and Unwritten Constitutions

43:18 Self Evident Truths and Equality

48:29 Warrant Dignity and Christian Roots

54:19 Walsh Liberalism and Its Origins

01:00:52 Media Myths and Closing Thoughts

Dan Pitt has experience with both theory and practice. He teaches and writes books about political theory. And he's been involved with several election campaigns, including serving as a candidate in a recent by-election.

Power rests with ideas. Unless we shape ideas, forming government can mean you are simply in office but out of power.

Check out Dan's book he co-edited with Ferenc Hörcher: Intellectual Conservatism from Burke to Scruton

And tell me what you think of this episode!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley welcomes back Professor Dan Pitt, a research fellow at the University of Buckingham and member of the Centre for Heterodox Social Science, to discuss bridging political theory and practice. Pitt reflects on a busy 2025—publishing articles, promoting his book Intellectual Conservatism (from Burke to Scruton), running as a Conservative candidate in the Long Eaton North council by-election (finishing second, 23 votes behind after starting third), and welcoming a newborn daughter, Marigold. The conversation centers on Pitt’s argument that conservatives must fight on both the intellectual/cultural level and the practical electoral level, because losing the battle of ideas leads to losing elections (“in office but not in power”). They discuss his campaign slogan—sound economics, cultural revival, and flourishing local communities—and how these themes connected with voters through everyday concerns like household budgeting, passing culture to children, and strengthening local “little platoons.” Whatley and Pitt explore the tension between conservatism and the Conservative Party, including the idea that conservatism is broader than party politics (cultural, theological, and rooted in views of human nature) and that the British Conservative Party contains a liberal strand due to historical mergers, meaning it is never purely conservative. Pitt rejects the claim that conservatism is simply liberalism, arguing that liberalism itself is diverse and that conservatism and liberalism have influenced each other while remaining distinct in views of the person, knowledge, markets, law, and custom. They discuss Stanley Baldwin’s legacy—his unifying “one nation” vision, his Christian-inflected rhetoric, his electoral success, and his emphasis on national greatness and social cohesion—along with questions of assimilation, multiculturalism, and how to build unity through education, shared history, heroes, and a national story that invites newcomers without erasing their identities. Pitt also addresses conservative views of property as responsibility, identity, and character-building, Baldwin’s approach to industrial relations aligning labor and capital, and Baldwin’s anonymous voluntary financial contribution to help pay war debt. The episode closes with Pitt on gratitude, the challenge of criticizing government policy without repudiating one’s country or people, and a preview of his upcoming June book, The Conservative Party in the Constitution (Manchester University Press), covering topics from local government and devolution to Northern Ireland and the constitutional outlook up to Rishi Sunak.

00:00 Do Ideas Still Matter? Culture, Politics, and ‘In Office but Not in Power’

00:43 Meet Professor Dan Pitt: Book, Baby, and a Run for Office

04:35 Why ‘Intellectual Conservatism’ Tries to Bridge Theory and Practice

06:41 Two-Level Politics: Winning Elections vs Winning the Battle of Ideas

09:42 Doorstep Conservatism: Sound Economics, Cultural Revival, Local Flourishing

12:57 Conservatism vs the Conservative Party: Untangling Big-C and small-c

17:36 Is Conservatism Just Liberalism? Where They Overlap—and Where They Don’t

22:31 New Conservatism & Stanley Baldwin: One Nation, Unity, and National Greatness

29:08 Christian Politics Today: Unity in a More Secular Age

31:04 Baldwin’s Big Tent: Courting Methodists & the Non‑Conformist Vote

32:11 Electoral Machine: How Baldwin Built Landslides (and Beat Thatcher’s Swing)

33:12 Multiculturalism & the Challenge of a Shared National Story

35:18 Assimilation Through Education: Rebuilding Roots, Heroes, and Civic Belonging

39:57 Optimism, Tradition, and the ‘Tory Hope’ for the Future

44:02 Why Property Matters: Duty, Identity, and the Conservative Case for Ownership

47:37 Baldwin’s Industrial Relations: Aligning Capital & Labor + Anonymous Patriotism

51:28 Is Conservatism Just Class Interest? Debunking the ‘Party of the Rich’ Myth

56:13 What Keeps Him Up at Night: Gratitude, Ambition, and Criticizing Without Repudiating

01:00:29 Wrap-Up & What’s Next: The New Book on the Conservative Party and the Constitution

Dr. Ferenc Hörcher argues that intellectuals have a different job than politicians, but each can benefit from the other. In the ideal case, intellectuals avoid telling politicians what do, and politicians foster an appetite for intellectual discourse. 

We return to a discussion about Intellectual Conservatism: From Burke to Scruton, a book he co-edited with Daniel Pitt. It's priced as an academic book, but anyone interested in political thought and history would benefit from it.

Ferenc displays the best of what it means to be an intellectual conservative: openness, generosity, humour, breadth of interest, nuance, and much more. 

Looking forward to hearing what you think!

Thanks again,

Shawn

Chapters and AI summary

Host Shawn Whatley welcomes back Dr. Ferenc Hörcher, head of the Research Institute for Politics and Government at Ludovika University of Public Service in Hungary and senior research fellow at the Institute of Philosophy of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, to discuss Intellectual Conservatism: From Burke to Scruton, a book he co-edited with Daniel Pitt. Hörcher explains why political conservatives often fear intellectuals, citing 20th-century examples of intellectuals introducing destructive ideas into politics, but argues for a division of labor: politicians govern while intellectual conservatives think about politics and provide long-term perspective. The conversation emphasizes the book’s practical focus and its intellectual-historical narrative of Anglo-American conservatism, and Hörcher argues conservatives need not fear classical liberalism, since Anglo-American conservatism reacts to liberalism while retaining respect for its core achievements such as individual liberty and constitutional traditions. Drawing on his experience growing up in communist Hungary and gaining freedom in 1990, Hörcher says he values the West’s non-communist traditions—including liberalism, Christian democracy, and democratic socialism—and rejects culture-war framing in favor of prudential problem-solving on issues like education, migration, climate, and demography. They discuss Oakeshott’s critique of rationalist planning and the post-liberal debate (including British political theology strands and American figures like Patrick Deneen and Adrian Vermeule), with Hörcher expressing doubts about post-liberalism as a political solution while affirming liberal institutional achievements such as rule of law, free speech, and academic freedom. Hörcher distinguishes liberal and conservative individualism by stressing community, responsibility, and the fragility of freedom; he connects property ownership and markets to moral formation, describing Thatcher’s project as moral rather than merely economic and arguing market exchange is inherently personal and bound up with dignity, trust, and responsibility. In closing, Hörcher says politics must be approached with awareness of human mortality and highlights Roger Scruton’s later emphasis on “oikophilia,” love of home, urging civic participation, care for local communities, and sustaining Western culture through civility.

00:00 Are Conservatives Afraid of Intellectuals? (Cold Open)

00:38 Meet Dr. Ferenc Hörcher + What This Episode Covers

04:29 Host’s Big Question: Is Conservatism ‘For’ or ‘Against’ Things?

06:35 Why ‘Intellectual Conservatism’ Matters: Division of Labor with Politicians

11:20 Why Leaders Should Read: Long-Term Perspective vs. Media Politics

15:50 Conservatism & Liberalism as Shared Anglo-American Political Culture

17:55 Coalitions, the ‘Non-Left,’ and the Postliberal Challenge

20:30 Hörcher’s Central European Lens: Freedom After Communism

26:47 Pivot to Oakeshott: Rationalism, Planning, and Political Opponents

31:18 When Liberalism Shifts: Utopianism, Equality, and the Return of ‘Planners’

34:34 Philip Blond on Universalism: Liberalism as the West’s New ‘Universal’

35:55 Post-Liberalism as Political Theology: Faith, Secularism, and Liberalism’s Roots

39:23 Is John Gray a Post-Liberal? Zigzags, British vs. American Currents, and a New Wave of Books

42:27 What Post-Liberals Actually Critique: Defending Liberal Institutions While Reviving Virtue

48:30 Conservative vs. Liberal Individualism: Community, Fragility of Freedom, and Responsibility

55:48 Property, Markets, and Moral Formation: Thatcher, the Middle Class, and Stewardship Across Generations

01:04:50 Dignity, Trust, and Exchange: From Healthcare to Why Humans Aren’t Machines (or AI)

01:10:23 Final Reflection: Mortality, Scruton’s ‘Oikophilia,’ and Civility Through Local Participation

But behind the pizzaz lies a deep thinker. Franco loves the nerdy arguments buried in books few people read. They inform his tirades on social media. So don't be fooled, he's not just a talking head.

I kept trying to pull our discussion into the ideas behind the nonsense. However, Franco's outrageous examples of waste make ideas seem irrelevant. How can we even get to a theoretical discussion given so many examples of taxation lunacy? 

Be sure to check out The Canadian Taxpayers Federation and Franco's new book: Axing the Tax-The rise and fall of Canada's carbon tax. 

Chapters and AI summary:

Unveiling the Hidden Costs: A Deep Dive into Canadian Taxes with Franco Terrazzano In this episode of Concepts with Shawn Whatley, Franco Terrazzano, the director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation and author of 'Axing the Tax,' delves into the intricate world of Canadian taxation. Terrazzano discusses why taxes are a significant issue for the average Canadian family, far beyond just the financial burden. The conversation touches on wasteful government spending, the philosophy behind taxation, and the accountability (or lack thereof) in how tax dollars are spent. Together, they explore examples of extravagant expenditures by the government, the role of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, potential tax reforms, and the deeper ideological considerations behind tax policies. The episode also offers insights into the broader implications of government intervention in various sectors, emphasizing the need for prudence and accountability.

00:00 Introduction: The Importance of Taxes

00:17 Meet Franco Terrazzano: Tax Expert and Advocate

02:25 Highlighting Government Waste

05:19 The Role and Achievements of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

08:13 Debating the Nature of Taxation

13:04 Government Spending and Accountability

15:13 Historical Context and Current Challenges

23:39 Legal Battles and Victories

26:09 Philosophical Underpinnings and Influences

29:14 Introduction to Professor Flanagan and Canadian Taxpayers Federation

30:41 Balancing Seriousness with Humor in Advocacy

32:50 Healthcare and Government Spending Issues

37:01 Central Planning and Economic Policies

40:10 Taxation and Government Accountability

52:36 Personal Reflections and Final Thoughts

Canada has led the world as a test case on the limits of freedom with our MAiD (euthanasia) legislation, approach to COVID, and the Emergency Measure's Act. These are complex legal issues.

I always learn something when I talk with Barry. Let me know what you think of this episode!

Thanks again for listening.

Shawn

210 degrees Celsius: 16 ways the truckers ignited Canada for the long haul

First Freedoms Foundation

Chapters and AI summary:

Essential Conversations on Freedom and its Limits with Barry Bussey In this enlightening episode, host Shawn Whatley welcomes Barry Bussey, a prominent lawyer and founder of the First Freedoms Foundation, to discuss the intricacies of freedom and its limits. The dialogue spans a broad array of topics, including the role of courts and legislatures in determining freedoms, the history and influence of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the impact of governmental and bureaucratic decisions on personal liberties. Barry shares insights from his recent book on the Freedom Convoy of 2022, reflecting on the societal implications of enforced mandates and the essential freedoms of speech, religion, and personal security. They also delve into the philosophical foundations of freedom, trace its historical evolution, and discuss potential future threats, including the rise of artificial intelligence and digital control. This episode is a must-watch for anyone interested in the delicate balance between freedom and governance.

00:00 Introduction: Exploring the Limits of Freedom

00:48 Historical Context and Legal Foundations

01:14 Meet Barry Bussey: Advocate for Freedom

03:12 Founding the First Freedoms Foundation

07:56 Challenges and Achievements of the Foundation

13:30 The Role of Judges and Legislatures in Defining Freedom

24:05 The Charter and Its Implications

30:17 The Common Law Tradition and Human Rights

36:29 The Power of Courts and Euthanasia Debate

38:30 Judicial Oversight and Executive Power

41:09 The Emergencies Act and Government Authority

44:49 The Role of Bureaucracy and Executive Decisions

46:14 Introducing the Book: 210 Degrees Celsius

48:27 The Trucker Convoy and Government Mandates

54:15 Reflections on the COVID-19 Pandemic

58:19 Concerns About Artificial Intelligence and Future Freedoms

01:04:19 The Importance of Physical Books in the Digital Age

Barb wrote a piece on Norman Podhoretz, when he passed in December. She mentions reading everything he had ever written: books and articles; editorials in his role as senior editor of Commentary Magazine, everything.

Podhoretz was one of the brilliant Jews from New York who left the 1960's liberalism and discovered conservatism. Irving Kristol, the 'godfather of neoconservatism', said neoconservatives were "liberals who have been mugged by reality."

Of course, most neocons weren't Jews; they included a broad swath of Catholic and Protestant thinkers. But the Jews stood out, in part, because they brought their bellicose, New York attitude into right-wing politics. They applied revolutionary zeal from their former communist and Trotskyite experience to conservatism. They transformed the old conservatism of the American Republican party into something new in North America: neoconservatism.

After the Iraq war, neoconservatism became a term of derision. It became re-interpreted as nothing but a blend of zionism -- Christian and Jewish -- with hawkish foreign policy. 

This redefinition was a profound mistake. It dismisses a whole political mindset, while at the same time shielding it from serious discussion. Like so many other words silenced by political correctness, neoconservatism can no longer be critiqued for its strengths and weaknesses.

We need to celebrate the brilliance of Podhoretz and Irving Kristol, while also critiquing where neoconservatism failed. Neoconservative thought remains a central part, perhaps even the embodiment, of modern political conservative opinion.

If we want to understand how best to apply conservatism to current issues, we need to dig deep into the neocon mindset.

Please let me know what you think!

Barbara Kay: 60 years ago, Norman Podhoretz's writing led me to conservatism

AI Summary 

In this episode, Shawn Whatley engages in a thought-provoking discussion with Barbara Kay, a renowned columnist and author. They delve into the origins, evolution, and nuances of neoconservatism, exploring the influential works of Norman Podhoretz and Irving Kristol. Barbara shares her insights on conservatism, its philosophical underpinnings, and its enduring relevance in today's political landscape. They also touch on various contentious issues such as the limitations of human nature, the impact of anti-Americanism, and the evolution of liberalism. Tune in for a deep dive into the intellectual journey that shapes conservative thought.

00:00 Introduction to Neoconservatism

00:09 Defining Conservatism and Classical Liberalism

01:32 Meet Barbara Kay

01:40 Norman Podhoretz: A Legacy in Neoconservatism

02:10 The Jewish Connection to Neoconservatism

02:54 Barbara Kay's Tribute to Norman Podhoretz

05:27 Podhoretz's Intellectual Journey

07:32 The Role of Intellectuals in Conservatism

10:14 Neoconservatism and Universalism

17:32 The Balance Between Universalism and Particularism

32:02 The Importance of Moral Clarity

36:54 Modern Neoconservatism and Its Challenges

39:10 The Banality of Evil and Rationalization

40:29 Calvinism and the Rejection of Scholasticism

41:38 Jewish Perspectives on Evil

43:01 Conservatism and Human Nature

48:38 Neoconservatism and Its Critiques

01:06:04 The Role of Education in Society

01:10:18 Concluding Thoughts on Conservatism and Hope

Are the accolades warranted? Or are we being fooled by eloquence?

I couldn't resist recording something about The Speech. In this episode I offer three big points:

1. Carney appears to use a sycophantic foreign policy strategy. Is it rational? Will it work?

2. Carney appropriates brilliance to serve his own ends. Is that fair or justified?

3. The speech itself is confused. Do the speech writers understand how liberalism and marxism are both siblings of the Enlightenment?

Canada is in a better place with a more intelligent, less narcissistic leader. However, we should worry when our PM strikes alliances with a sworn enemy of our closest neighbour.

Let me know what you think!

Cheers

My Patreon

AI summary and chapters:

In this episode of Concepts, Shawn Whatley critically examines Mark Carney's recent speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos. Whatley highlights Carney's inconsistent foreign policy positions, eloquence devoid of genuine understanding, and a fundamental confusion born out of Enlightenment principles. Through three main points—Carney's sycophantic behavior, the content, and the inherent contradictions in his speech—Whatley unpacks why Carney's approach is problematic. Join the conversation and explore the complexities behind Carney's ideas and their implications.

00:00 Introduction and Overview

00:34 Foreign Policy Critique

03:00 Analyzing the Speech

05:44 Fundamental Confusion and Enlightenment

11:28 Conclusion and Call to Action

Cole explains how Pierre Elliott Trudeau focussed on reshaping Canada. Economic issues seemed to bore him. PE Trudeau reshaped the Canadian constitution in his own image in the 1980s.

Conservatives have been off balance ever since. Having lost ceded the platform to Trudeau's priors, conservatives have tried to argue within the framework Trudeau built. 

A new, younger batch of conservatives want to change the framework. They are tired of losing by rules set by the opposing team. They want to play offence. 

Cole explains how the New Right wants conservatives to win on culture, national identity, and social concerns, not just pocket-book issues. He calls younger voters to get involved. "Participation is a solution in itself," he says.

Whether you agree with Hogan or not, you have to admit conservatism is changing shape in Canada. Fascinating to see what emerges!

Check out Cole's articles and website below. And remember, Patreon members get to see the content a bit early. I respond to comments there first. (Everything is free, but you need to subscribe).

Thanks for checking this out!

Shawn

If conservatives shun Canada’s institutions, how can we possibly reform them?

Red Tory? Blue Liberal? These terms mean nothing anymore

The right can no longer hide from Pierre Trudeau's legacy

ColeHogan.ca

Summary + Chapters (AI)

Dive into the world of Canadian politics with Shawn Whatley and guest Cole Hogan, a political strategist and communications expert. This episode explores the lasting impact of Pierre Elliot Trudeau on Canada's identity, the challenges faced by the conservative movement, and the necessity of engaging with national institutions. Learn about the significance of participation in politics and the evolving landscape of Canadian conservatism. Discover why young Canadians are crucial to shaping the future and how the conservative movement can navigate contemporary social and cultural issues, shedding light on the importance of being involved and informed.

00:00 Introduction to Pierre Elliot Trudeau's Impact on Canadian Politics

00:21 Guest Introduction: Cole Hogan

00:33 The Conservative Movement and Trudeau's Legacy

01:51 The Right's Shift in Focus: From Economics to Social Issues

03:22 The Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Defining Document

04:40 Conservative Strategies and Historical Context

10:43 The Role of Canadian Institutions and Young Conservatives

19:21 Challenges and Opportunities for Young Conservatives

23:24 Encouraging Civic Participation

27:28 Getting Involved in Civic Committees

29:41 Conservative Perspectives on Policy

30:41 Challenges of Federal Programs

32:10 Humility in Policy Making

35:50 The Role of Opposition in Governance

40:05 Red Tory vs. Blue Tory 44:19 Engaging the Public in Politics

50:28 The Impact of the Pandemic on Trust in Government

In that sense, JJ is a better politician than many politicians: he never forgets his constituency.

Don't be fooled by JJ's high-energy, youthful style. He puts a ton of research into his videos. 

The non left needs to pay attention when JJ speaks. You don't have to agree with him! In fact, JJ makes of point of raising things that will provoke discussion and (some) disagreement. He's the guy at the parade shouting about the Emperor's clothes.

JJ has strong opinions on the monarchy. His comments about the governor general were especially good, I thought. He didn't convince me that we should abandon the monarchy in Canada, but he did make me think.

What I appreciate most about JJ is his willingness to have a conversation. 

JJ's YouTube Channel 

Canada's Constitution is Weird

AI summary:

Join Shawn Whatley and popular YouTuber JJ McCullough as they tackle the controversial topic of the monarchy's relevance in Canada. JJ shares his strong opinions on the monarchy, arguing that it has long been irrelevant to most Canadians, including conservatives. They explore the role of the Governor General, the monarchy's symbolic nature, and its political implications. In addition to the monarchy debate, the discussion spans various cultural and political issues, including American interventionism, immigration, and the complexities of gender and identity politics. With JJ's energetic communication style and deep research, this episode promises to be both thought-provoking and engaging. Don't miss out on this intellectual exchange—hit like and subscribe!

00:00 Introduction: The Relevance of the Monarchy in Canada

00:25 Meet JJ McCullough: YouTuber and Political Pundit

02:01 Debating the Monarchy's Role in Canada

04:55 The Symbolism and Perception of the Monarchy

09:44 The Governor General's Role and Public Perception

16:00 Comparing Canadian and American Views on Monarchy

21:13 The Future of the Monarchy in Canada

25:59 Pivot to Global Politics: Venezuela and Trump

32:29 Defining Conservatism vs. Right-Wing Politics

33:02 Trump's Foreign Policy and American Power

35:32 Liberal Media and Trump's Stance on Ukraine

36:57 Domestic Politics Influencing Foreign Policy

43:12 Cultural Debates: Neutrality vs. Activism

49:50 Advice for the Conservative Party

58:22 Trans Rights and Political Challenges

01:02:19 Concerns About Anti-Americanism in Canada

01:05:03 Final Thoughts and Appreciations

I know this sounds nerdy, but I think this is an essential challenge that thinkers on the non-left must work through. We believe that some truths are true everywhere, all the time, but that does not that mean, as liberalism asserts, that truth is true everywhere all the time in all places.

Are there truths that are only true in a particular place and time? Does it make us relativist post-moderns to entertain such heresy?

Using Dr. Geddert's notion of 'mediation between the universal and particular', conservatism offers a path to sanity between the two extremes.

I hope you find this episode as helpful as I did. Yes, we have some truths that are universal, for example, humans have inherent dignity wherever we find them. AND we have some truths that are particular, for example, common law works well in the Anglosphere, but we shouldn't expect it to work well in other places.

I hope you find this episode as useful as I did! Please let me know what you think.

Thanks again for tuning in!

Shawn

Article: Liberty without liberalism 

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley discusses the tension between universalism and particularism in politics with guest Jeremy Geddert, an associate professor of political science. Geddert explains how conservatism uniquely mediates between these two extremes, avoiding the pitfalls of both left and right liberalism as well as Schmidttian Postmodernism. They explore themes such as the historical roots of Canadian and American political philosophies, the concept of political technology, the role of virtue in politics, and the importance of acknowledging our inherited traditions. Geddert also highlights insights from his upcoming article 'Liberty Without Liberalism' and shares his views on the influence of enlightenment liberalism and modernity. This episode provides a deep dive into the philosophical underpinnings of conservatism, offering valuable perspectives on contemporary political debates. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and support on Patreon!

00:00 Introduction: The Universal vs. The Particular in Politics

01:04 Guest Introduction: Meet Jeremy Geddert

01:50 Exploring Universalism and Particularism

05:07 Historical Context: American and Canadian Liberalism

10:36 The Role of Religion in Early Colonies

15:59 Modernity and Political Technology

28:06 The Evolution of Liberty and Liberalism

34:07 The Role of Love and Tradition in National Identity

35:04 The Link Between Efficiency and Dignity

39:49 Critique of Modern Liberalism

44:07 The Waves of Modernity and Their Impact

48:54 Conservatism as a Mediator Between Universal and Particular

55:36 The Importance of Metaphysics and Theology

01:00:12 Revelation and Human Connection

01:05:02 Concerns and Hopes for the Future

David Leis has spent decades in Canadian politics, and he's worried. Canada is in decline. We need leadership to change course, not simply a change in government.

He packages his concern in terms of data, comparisons with other countries, and political argument. As President and CEO of the Frontier Centre for Public Policy, he has a ton of evidence to draw upon. But his concern springs from a deep love for Canada. It generates an urgency that breaks through, as it did in this episode around the half-way mark.

David gives me hope. He's one of many Canadians on the non-left who believe Canada could be so much better. Life doesn't need to be this hard.

I'd love to hear what you think of the episode! And in case you missed it, I post this content early on my Patreon account (free). 

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts, Shawn Whatley is joined by David Leis, President and CEO of the Frontier Center for Public Policy, to discuss the current socio-economic and cultural issues facing Canada. They explore how radical leftist ideologies have infiltrated Canadian institutions and the resulting decline in societal and economic stability. David Leis delves into the importance of empowering citizens through education reform, fostering market competition, and ensuring government accountability. The conversation stresses the urgency for renewed leadership and a return to foundational principles to avert further decline. Tune in for a thought-provoking discussion on the future of Canada and practical solutions for a national revival.

00:00 Introduction: The Crisis in Canada

00:51 Meet David Leis: Background and Expertise

01:18 The Urgency of Canada's Situation

03:19 Defining Decline and Leadership

07:36 The Role of Government and Citizens

14:17 Cultural Foundations and Civic Education

17:54 Challenges and Solutions for Canada's Future

30:34 The Stakes of Institutional Capture

31:33 Challenges in Education Reform

32:30 Innovative Education Models

35:07 Economic Decline and Urgency for Change

37:03 The Canadian Wheat Board and Agricultural Renaissance

38:16 Crown Corporations and Productivity Issues

41:12 Balancing Free Enterprise and Culture

44:01 Call for Leadership and National Renewal

Alex MacDonald says it doesn't make sense. We never make economics the ultimate priority for family decisions, why do we think it's ok to prioritize economy at a national level?

This discussion gets to the heart of debate within the conservative movement. Of course, we need a strong economy. But should economic concerns always trump all other issues? Is money our ultimate social good?

Alex offers solid answers; ones we don't usually hear from those on the non-left. 

Equally fascinating for me was the fact that Alex is sharing answers at all. For the last several decades, staffers and consultants have kept quiet about culture. Conservatives win on the economy, so we should focus conversation on the economy. Don't mention culture, if you want to be included in policy discussions.

Today, culture is back. Canadians are tired of being told their country is rotten, its founding is illegitimate, and perhaps it isn't even a nation at all. It's just a post-national state. Voters don't want to see people burning Canadian flags and blocking streets with smoke-filled protests.

It will be fascinating to see how Conservative leaders respond to this palpable change in public discourse.

Articles mentioned:

In doubt of fusionism

The King and love of country

AI summary:

Shawn Whatley welcomes public policy and government relations expert Alex MacDonald to discuss the juxtaposition of economic liberty and social tradition. They delve into the principles of fusionism, balancing market efficiency with moral and social values, and the relevance of the monarchy in contemporary Canada. Through their engaging dialogue, they explore how these foundational ideas shape our communal life and public policy, drawing on historical context, philosophical insights, and current political debates. Don't miss this thought-provoking episode filled with deep reflections on the core values guiding our society.

00:00 Introduction: Balancing Liberty in Economy and Personal Life

00:54 Meet the Guest: Alex MacDonald

01:26 Exploring Fusionism in Politics

02:39 Debating Economic Liberty vs. Social Continuity

04:18 Fusionism: A Deeper Dive

19:01 Healthcare and Libertarianism

21:57 Conservatism and Market Forces

31:36 Philosophical Reflections on Conservatism

37:12 Philosophical Concerns About Fusion

37:34 Market Efficiency vs. Moral Life

39:32 Moral Decay and Individualism

41:27 The Irony of Side Hustle Culture

48:05 Autonomy vs. Freedom

56:46 The Role of the Monarchy in Canada

01:10:56 Concerns for Future Generations

Why read? Better yet, why buy books you will never be able to read?

Don't overestimate what you know. Building a personal library of more books that you can ever read will remind you of how much you do not know. It creates a presence in your home of intentional ignorance.

I got the idea from this article: Umberto Eco's Anti-Library 

Thank you so much to my audience and guests! It has been far more fun and informative than I expected.

Wishing you all the best for Christmas and the New Year!

Shawn

AI summary:

In this Christmas special, Shawn Whatley delves into the concept of 'Intentional Ignorance,' inspired by Umberto Eco’s extensive library, to emphasize humility in the pursuit of knowledge. He also reflects on the true meaning of Christmas, including the proper way to receive gifts with gratitude, and the importance of being honest about our inherited cultural attachments. Join the conversation as Shawn intertwines philosophical insights with personal anecdotes to celebrate the Christmas season meaningfully.

00:00 Christmas Greetings and Introduction

00:15 Exploring the Concept of Intentional Ignorance

01:34 The Quest for Certainty and Its Pitfalls

03:33 Connecting Knowledge and Humility

05:42 Embracing Christmas Traditions

06:38 The True Meaning of Christmas Gifts

08:44 Approaches to Receiving Gifts

09:33 Reflections on Gift Giving and Receiving

14:01 Podcast Reflections and Future Plans

15:19 Final Christmas Wishes

Dr. Michael Bonner applies his experience as a historian and political consultant to the current crisis of liberalism. He explains what's going on by reaching back several thousand years.

Although this episode is heavy, his book is highly readable. He covers 2000 years of history in 200 pages. It helps if you know the people he references, but even if you don't, you can follow along. Great writer.

Books:

The Crisis of Liberalism: The Origin and Destiny of Freedom

In Defense of Civilization: How Our Past Can Renew Our Present

Looking forward to hearing what you think.

Thanks again!

AI Summary

In this episode of Concepts with Shawn Whatley, historian Dr. Michael Bonner discusses his latest book, 'The Crisis of Liberalism: The Origin and Destiny of Freedom.' Delving into 2000 years of history, Bonner explores the roots and future of liberalism, highlighting its medieval origins and the inherent challenges it faces today. They question whether contemporary liberalism can offer meaning and community, touching on topics like personal freedom, historical continuity, and the secularization of Christian values. Tune in to learn how these complex ideas affect our society and where we might go from here.

00:00 Introduction: The Crisis of Liberalism

00:57 Meet Dr. Michael Bonner

01:11 Overview of 'The Crisis of Liberalism'

01:45 Historical Context and Liberalism

02:39 Defining Liberalism and Its Challenges

04:54 Philosophical Foundations of Liberalism

11:23 Medieval Roots of Modern Liberalism

13:28 The Evolution of Liberal Thought

33:33 Hegelian View of History and Liberalism

34:36 Challenging the Liberal Establishment

35:04 Medieval Ideas in Modern Times

35:30 The Axioms of Liberalism

37:15 The Self-Evident Truths

39:08 The Evolution of Christian Thought

44:44 The Paradoxes of Liberalism

54:19 The Religion of Humanity

01:03:54 The Future of Liberalism

01:06:09 Concluding Thoughts

Thanks for listening!

Shawn: What do young people want these days? Do they want total unfettered freedom or do they want to be challenged? Check it out.

Kate: This is what I love talking about with young people, because they are ready to rise to this challenge, right? Young people want to be challenged. They want to do things that instil order, they want to go to the symphony and know that there are rules and you don't clap between movements and you should have printed program notes and that it's gonna be programmed in a certain way.

Shawn: Welcome to Concepts. My name is Shawn Whatley. Today we have Kate Marland with us. Kate has a fascinating education. She started out in the fine arts, getting a Bachelor of music, studying viola, at Ottawa and McGill. From there, she went on and did a Master's of Arts in fashion studies at Ryerson with a focus on the opera.

Then she went on and became a lawyer, and she's worked as a lawyer for some time. And then she worked in management. She was the recent manager of the Liberty and Leadership program at the Montreal Economic Institute, and most recently, she's become a contributing editor at the new, media Outlet Without Diminishment on Substack.

She has brought together her background in the fine arts or high culture, as she calls it, and is applying it to today's moment, and right now she finds that especially young people aren't so happy with this life that seems to say, “Leave home, go to school, get a great degree, go get a great job. Live in a box in a large city and make sure you earn lots of money and pay lots of taxes and keep the economy going.”

She said, young people are finding that that's not a great life and there's more to life than that. And the exciting thing about it, or the challenging thing about it is. She and others with her at Without Diminishment are saying not only are we finding that this life is empty and that we need more, but they're also finding that there's a role for government in all this.

So a simple change in tax policy can completely diminish a particular culture, whether it's high arts, symphony, et cetera. And Kate's message here is that Conservatives need to pay a whole lot more attention to preservation of high culture. And again, her background is, uh, music symphony. So our discussion ranged across the tension between an economic liberalism or libertarianism.

We talked about how experience shapes our aesthetic sense.

And we talked about Without Diminishment itself and what they're trying to achieve there and whether or not it's wise to have government impose itself in a way that impacts culture

We talked about the recent couple episodes we've had with, Anthony Koch and Sean Speer, and their ongoing discussion about culture being a central objective for government to fulfill and protect and foster.

Overall a fascinating discussion. Kate is really pouring herself into studying and developing thoughts in this space on culture beyond simply economics. And what role does government have to play? In fostering an environment in which culture can flourish. Anyways, fascinating discussion. I hope you enjoyed as much as I did.

Don't forget to hit like and subscribe. It really makes a big difference. I try not to bug you about it, but let's get on with the show.

AI Summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley delves deep into what young people really want today with guest Kate Marland. With a rich background in music, fashion, and law, Marland discusses the need for conservatives to embrace and preserve high culture, such as opera and symphony, to foster a spiritually fulfilling society. The episode covers topics such as the intersection of economics and aesthetics, the limitations of libertarianism, and how government policies impact culture. The conversation also ventures into the role of institutions like Without Diminishment and the Montreal Economic Institute in shaping a future that values beauty, tradition, and community. Ideal for anyone keen on exploring how cultural pursuits and economic policies can coexist in a meaningful way.

00:00 Introduction: What Do Young People Want?

00:33 Meet Kate Marland: A Diverse Background

01:17 Kate's Journey and Insights on Culture

01:52 The Role of Government in Culture

03:52 Discussion on Kate's Article

07:56 Balancing Libertarianism and Cultural Appreciation

19:10 Challenges and Value of High Culture

31:17 The Conservative Dilemma: No Perfect Result

32:18 The Malaise of Modern Society

33:16 The Disconnection of Young People

36:25 The Appeal of Tradition and High Culture

37:44 The Role of Government and Institutions in Culture

45:29 Without Diminishment: A New Approach

57:49 The Tension Between Capitalism and Human Value

01:01:19 Final Thoughts and Reflections

This whole conversation is essential for Canadians right now, conservatives especially. Its outcome determines the entire cant of the Conservative Party of Canada.

Sean laid out his argument here also: Six reasons why a state-imposed conservative culture is a terrible idea. 

Book mentioned: What Is Conservatism?: A New Edition of the Classic by 12 Leading Conservatives

Thanks so much for checking this out!

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley welcomes back Sean Speer, lecturer at the Munk School of Public Policy and a senior fellow at the Public Policy Forum. They delve into the ongoing debate within Canadian conservatism: Is culture a product of will or inheritance? They explore the implications of this divide, the role of state neutrality, and what it means to be a conservative in Canada today. Drawing on historical context, personal experiences, and current issues, this conversation provides rich insights into the evolving conservative movement. Join them for a stimulating discussion on the nature of culture, politics, and society.

00:00 Introduction: Culture and Will vs. Inheritance

00:45 Meet Sean Speer: A Conservative Thought Leader

01:12 Debate on State Neutrality

03:10 Fusionism and Canadian Conservatism

04:24 Sean Speer's Journey and Reflections

05:26 Historical Context and Modern Conservatism

12:12 Institutional Neutrality: Myth or Reality?

20:37 Personal Reflections on Conservatism

35:12 Exploring Individual and Collective Purpose

36:31 The Role of the State in Society

36:39 Edmund Burke and Constitutionalism

38:40 Institutional Changes and Public Neutrality

42:41 Cultural Inheritance vs. Will

50:29 Historical Perspectives on Market Forces

54:58 The New Right and Intellectual Conservatism

01:01:04 Challenges of Pluralism and Trust in Government

01:09:01 Concluding Thoughts and Future Outlook

Conservatives will keep losing until they realise that the must pick a side, when they form government. They cannot aim to simply manage the state. They need to shape it.

This is a hot debate in Canada right now. Anthony says there is no such thing as a neutral institution. All institutions pick sides. It's impossible to avoid.

Sean Speer takes the other side of the debate. We will post his episode on Thursday this week.

Anthony and Sean are two of Canada's leading political thinkers. You don't want to miss this!

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts, Shawn Whatley hosts Anthony Koch, a consultant, entrepreneur, and managing principal of AK Strategies. They delve into the ongoing intellectual debate with Sean Speer on whether the government should remain neutral on cultural issues or actively support and protect a distinct Canadian culture. They explore how deeply embedded visions of culture influence our institutions, including government agencies, universities, NGOs, and not-for-profit organizations. The discussion covers case studies such as recent BC elections, where cultural issues like drug policy, sex education, and refugee acceptance played significant roles. Anthony argues against the myth of neutrality, emphasizing that state institutions have never been neutral and always impact culture. He discusses the importance of a cohesive cultural identity, the challenges of multiculturalism, and the need for conservatives to articulate and implement a clear vision for Canada's future. The episode provides a fascinating and comprehensive analysis of the intersection between culture and politics, offering insights into how conservatives can reclaim cultural ground.

00:00 Introduction: Government's Role in Culture

00:45 Meet the Guest: Anthony Koch

01:26 Debate Overview: Government Neutrality in Culture

02:10 Anthony's Perspective on Cultural Influence

04:31 Historical Context: State and Culture

06:17 The Role of Education in National Identity

11:34 Conservative Strategies and Critiques

13:04 The Impact of Political Leadership

14:33 The Trudeau Legacy and Canadian Identity

16:35 Conservative Vision for Canada's Future

21:31 Judicial Influence and Political Conservatism

32:55 Healthcare Reform and Structural Change

36:01 Introduction to Failing Policy Philosophy

36:13 Infrastructure Argument in Immigration

37:02 Welfare State and Demographic Assumptions

38:08 Economic Contributions of Immigrants

39:24 Cultural Integration Challenges

43:28 Historical Context of Immigration

46:26 Modern Immigration and Cultural Identity

52:25 Political and Cultural Shifts in Canada

01:04:05 Concluding Thoughts and Reflections

Matt embodies a conservative life. 

I first met Matt at the Project Ontario conference he organized (with help from others) in Toronto. He speaks well, listens closely, and can carry a conversation as though you've known him forever. I admired his polish and walked away assuming he must be a management-consultant type: impressive, but too careful to say anything sharp.

I was wrong.

Matt wrote a piece for Without Diminishment titled The First Institution. "Cultural renewal begins not in an election, not in a campaign, but in the ordinary work of raising kids and holding families together." Fantastic presentation of real-life conservatism.

We need more people like Matt; people who can bridge the gap between theory and practice. Ideas are essential, but we also need live them. 

Thanks again for checking this out. Let me know what you think!

AI Summary:

In this episode of 'Concepts' with Shawn Whatley, board member of the Canada Strong and Free Network, Matt Spoke discusses his impactful work with Project Ontario. They delve into the framing of political conversations, the importance of building businesses, and policies to create a strong, economically vibrant Canada. Matt shares how his experience as an entrepreneur and father translates to his views on conservatism and societal improvement. The conversation touches on the challenges of integrating immigrants, fostering community trust, and the critical role of education in shaping future citizens. Join us for an insightful discussion on the conservative vision for Canada's future.

00:00 Introduction: Setting the Stage for Political Conversations

00:25 Meet Matt Spoke: Developer, Organizer, and Community Insider

02:46 Project Ontario: Addressing Ontario's Drift

06:35 Challenges and Opportunities in Ontario's Policy Landscape

09:24 Conservatism in Office vs. Out of Office

14:02 The Role of Naivety and Innovation in Politics

18:16 Family and Conservatism: A Personal Perspective

28:19 Building Community in an Urbanized Society

32:18 The Role of Trust in Building Community

32:47 Cultural Cohesion in Diverse Urban Areas

33:30 Immigration and Shared Canadian Identity

33:58 The Decline of Community Watch and Social Trust

34:26 Extending an Olive Branch to Newcomers

36:38 Challenges of Integration and Multiculturalism

38:07 The Importance of Shared Culture and Vision

42:41 The Role of Leadership in Fostering Culture

43:54 Economic Policy and Cultural Impact

52:13 The Value of Family and Optimism for the Future

01:00:15 Education's Role in Shaping Society

01:02:18 Final Thoughts and Reflections

When Ben speaks, people listen.

Debate about first principles has finally returned to the Canadian non-left. A new, mostly younger group of conservative writers and speakers have challenged the status quo.

Young people, especially, find that Canada does not work well. Home ownership is a fairytale. Safe cities are nostalgia. And Canadian patriotism is embarrassing and unkind.

The new right refuses to accept these presuppositions. They want politicians who have a vested interest in celebrating Canada itself.

What does this mean for conservative politics? How will this debate turn out?

Ben Woodfinden makes sense of it all for us.

Links:

AI Summary:

The New Right and Red Toryism: A Deep Dive with Ben Woodfinden In this episode of Concepts, Shawn Whatley hosts Ben Woodfinden, a consultant, doctoral student, and political theorist, to discuss the dynamics of the new right in Canada. Ben, a prominent contributor to conservative circles, highlights the generational divide in conservatism, and explores whether the real issue is young versus old rather than red versus blue. The discussion delves into political philosophy, particularly focusing on Red Toryism, a distinct Canadian tradition combining status interventionism for conservative ends. Ben also touches on the philosophical underpinnings of conservatism, the importance of grounding politics in first principles, and the future of Canadian identity. This thought-provoking episode is a must-watch for anyone interested in the evolving landscape of Canadian conservatism.

00:00 Introduction: The New Right in Canada

00:27 Meet Ben Woodfinden: A Conservative Thought Leader

01:08 The New Conservative Fight: Young vs. Old

01:21 Diving into Red Toryism

01:55 Understanding the Conservative Movement

02:20 Ben Woodfinden's Insights on Conservatism

04:30 Generational Divides in Conservatism

08:55 Philosophical Foundations of Conservatism

09:46 The Role of Government and Human Nature

18:12 Classical Liberalism vs. Conservatism

27:03 Liberalism's Historical Context and Limits

30:18 Red Toryism and Human Nature

30:54 Exploring Different Perspectives on the State

31:49 Understanding Toryism and Red Toryism

32:46 The Evolution and Misinterpretation of Red Toryism

33:49 The Canadian Conservative Tradition

35:54 The Role of the State in Canadian Society

41:16 George Grant's Influence and Philosophy

43:00 Modern Reflections on Grant's Ideas

56:08 The Importance of Belief Systems in Modern Society

59:54 Concluding Thoughts on Canadian Identity

In BC, young students learn from daily land acknowledgements that they can never really call Canada their own. It belongs to someone else.

Students in Vancouver sing two national anthems, Canada’s and another belonging to coastal indigenous people. This goes beyond education and cultural awareness. These students learn to venerate indigenous nations to which they can never belong.

New Canadians learn that Canada isn’t something to love and celebrate. It’s something shameful, something to repudiate.

How long can Canada survive this continuous indoctrination?

Dr. Caroline Elliott has spoken up with courage and grace. She presents as a thoughtful, concerned parent of young children, who also happens to be extremely well educated and researched in the fundamental principles of democracy.

When you listen to Dr. Elliott, you will hear the heartbeat behind the Without Diminishment team.

Thanks for checking this out!

AI summary:

Join Shawn Whatley and Dr. Caroline Elliott as they explore the complex and pressing issues facing Canada today, from land acknowledgements in schools to indigenous land claims and the challenging dynamics of Canadian liberal democracy. Dr. Elliott, a PhD and co-founder of Without Diminishment, provides her insights on the evolving landscape of Canadian identity, the impact of progressive ideologies in education, and the importance of upholding democratic principles. This episode offers a thought-provoking conversation about the potential future of Canada, the integration of new Canadians, and what it means to be cohesive as a nation. Tune in for an engaging discussion that navigates the difficult terrain of heritage, legitimacy, and the principles that could hold Canada together.

00:00 Introduction: The Future of Canada

00:10 Land Acknowledgements in Schools

01:22 Interview with Dr. Caroline Elliott

01:49 Provocative Pieces in the National Post

03:23 Discussion on Democratic Principles

05:29 The Role of Without Diminishment

08:26 Cultural Identity and Western Values

22:31 Constitutional Challenges and Indigenous Governance

29:49 Reconciling Democratic Principles with Ancestry-Based Membership

30:04 Debate on Charter Application to Indigenous Governments

31:10 Indigenous Perspectives on Development and Community Impact

34:02 Complexities of Indigenous Governance and Public Interest

37:29 Political Interests and Indigenous Issues

40:45 Changing World and New Normals

45:25 Education and Cultural Integration Challenges

54:15 Concluding Thoughts on Canadian Identity and Inspiration

Ray Pennings has spent his life building a winsome and articulate defence of religion in the pubic square. It is not weird to admit we have religious beliefs (including non belief); it's weird to pretend we do not have them.

Canada and USA differ with respect to our approach to religion in the public square. We discuss the latest research from Cardus: a very large survey of over 10,000 people (5,001 in each country) on religiosity. It goes far beyond anything Stats Canada offers.

Boomers continue to keep religion out of the public square and polite conversation. Gen Z increasingly does the opposite. Canada and USA are in the midst of a generational change in social thought and politics.

Links:

Cardus 

How Canada-US religious differences affect politics 

AI Summary:

Join host Shawn Whatley as he sits down with Ray Pennings, co-founder and executive VP of the Think Tank Cardus, to discuss the role of religion in the public square. They delve into the findings of a recent study comparing Canadian and American religiosity, explore the perceived hostility towards religious commitment in Canada, and discuss the broader implications for society. Tune in for an articulate and nuanced discussion on civic engagement, the intersection of faith and politics, and the importance of maintaining hope and authenticity in public life.

00:00 Introduction: Religion in the Public Square

00:36 Meet Ray Pennings: Co-Founder of Cardus

00:54 Study Insights: Comparing American and Canadian Religiosity

01:20 Separation of Church and State: A Deep Dive

02:20 Charitable Giving and Volunteer Work

02:42 Press Release Highlights: Provocative Findings

03:14 Survey Methodology and Key Findings

08:07 Historical Context: Religion and Politics in North America

15:46 Religious Demographics and Trends

25:36 Political Implications of Religious Demographics

31:46 Political Party Dynamics in Canada

32:18 Faith in Public Life: A Complex Landscape

33:20 Historical Influence of Religion in Canadian Politics

34:09 The NDP and Social Gospel Movement

35:14 Tommy Douglas and Fiscal Conservatism

36:15 Christianity and Political Spectrum in Canada

37:40 Separation of Church and State: Risks and Realities

40:43 Principled Pluralism and Religious Freedom

42:05 Institutional Roles and Public Life

45:24 Core Beliefs and Public Engagement

48:36 Survey Insights and Public Perception

01:02:39 Final Thoughts and Summary

(Full disclosure: I have never seen myself as a Tory, neither High, Low, Red, Blue, or traditional.)

Political labels, especially old ones, mean nothing without definition. Even with working definitions, labels often bleed into each other at the edges, especially upon application to policy and law.

Since Toryism continues to get blamed for influencing how Canadian Conservatives think, trying to uncover and define Toryism seems a worthy exercise.

Ron Dart challenged me. He has a deep understanding of classics, which I admire. I will have to visit with him again to understand his deference to the state, as I see it.

Professor Dart is a delightful man: erudite, kind, thoughtful, and magnanimous. I hope you enjoy this as much as I did!

AI Summary

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley engages in a thought-provoking discussion with Professor Ron Dart, an expert on Toryism and the author of over 40 books, including 'The North American High Tory Tradition.' Together, they explore the nuances of Toryism and Red Toryism in Canada and the common misconceptions surrounding them. The conversation also delves into broader themes such as the role of the state, individualism, and the importance of historical memory and contemplation in contemporary society. Professor Dart provides insightful commentary on figures like George Grant, Stephen Leacock, Edmund Burke, and more, challenging prevalent assumptions and offering a deep analysis of political and philosophical traditions.

00:00 Introduction: Is Toryism Dead in Canada?

00:18 Exploring Toryism and Red Toryism

00:39 Meet Professor Ron Dart

00:51 The North American High Tory Tradition

01:36 Challenging Perceptions of State and Society

02:35 The Role of Innovation in History

05:00 Defining Toryism

08:32 The Fragmentation of Toryism

10:36 Red Toryism and Its Historical Context

16:45 Healthcare and the Role of the State

26:12 Toryism and Anglicanism

39:43 The Reformation and Individualism

48:23 Exploring Human Nature and Identity Politics

48:51 The Culture War and Liberalism's Tensions

51:51 Aristotle's Wisdom and the Role of Friendship

55:09 Hegel, Charles Taylor, and Liberalism

56:42 Critiquing Modern Liberalism and Conservatism

01:08:47 The Importance of Memory and Contemplation

Can the 1980's fusionism hold?

Will economic determinism help Conservatives to win elections today?

Links to articles

Decoding Canada's Conservative Coalition

Sam's Substack: The Country of Our Defeat

John Gray: Why I Am Not a Post-liberal

AI Summary

In this episode of Concepts with Shawn Whatley, Shawn dives into the evolving nature of Canadian conservatism. Joined by Sam Routley, a PhD student from the University of Western Ontario, the discussion begins with a basic inquiry: Are Canadian conservative ideas stuck in the past, or is there a renaissance in understanding what conservatism means today? They delve into Routley's research on the 'Decoding Canada's Conservative Coalition' piece, exploring the historical adherence to fusionism between free-market libertarianism and social traditionalism in Canada versus changes observed in other countries. Shawn further probes into whether economic policies alone can address contemporary societal issues or if a broader conversation about cultural and social values is necessary. Throughout the episode, they explore the nuances of economic determinism, the role of culture in conservative politics, and the future direction of conservatism in Canada. Don't miss their thoughtful and engaging exploration of these pressing topics in modern conservatism.

00:00 Introduction: Canadian Conservative Voters

00:47 Welcome to Concepts with Shawn Whatley

01:02 Interview with Sam Routley: Decoding Canada's Conservative Coalition

01:37 Fusionism in Canadian Conservatism

02:03 Canada's Conservative Coalition: Research Findings

02:58 Discussion on Economic Determinism and Cultural Issues

03:42 Sam Routley's Article and Substack

07:54 Fusionism Explained: US vs. Canada

25:37 Economic and Cultural Forces in Politics

33:33 The Role of Culture in Leadership and Innovation

35:32 The Cultural Focus of Conservatism

36:11 Economic vs Cultural Perspectives

37:11 The Role of the State in Culture

38:37 Contemporary Cultural Issues

42:06 Intellectual Conservatism and Canada's Future

47:31 The Importance of Foundational Values

54:18 The Debate on Liberalism and Conservatism

01:03:33 Concluding Thoughts on Cultural and Political Change

Alex says, "We don't care. I'm not incentivized to look the other way. I don't need an invite to a table of six at Terroni in the back room to talk about continuing the status quo."

In a world when young voters can't afford a house in Canada, you'd think they'd obsess about economics. They don't. They care as much about culture as being able to afford a home.

Alexander Brown works at the front of this young conservative uprising.

Enjoy!

Links:

Without Diminishment

National Citizens' Coalition

Against Andrew Coyne-ism

JunoNews

AI Summary 

In this episode, host Shawn Whatley is joined by Alexander Brown, a prolific writer, journalist, managing editor, and co-founder of Without Diminishment. Alexander also serves as the director of the National Citizens Coalition and hosts a show on Juno News. The conversation delves deep into the frustrations of young voters in Canada, particularly focusing on cultural and economic challenges. They discuss the conservative party's hesitancy to engage in cultural debates and the significance of platforms like Without Diminishment that aim to bridge this gap. Highlighting the growing discontent among young Canadians over issues like home ownership and social cohesion, Alexander and Shawn explore the potential for a rejuvenated conservative movement that does not shy away from cultural conversations. The episode also touches upon the platform's innovative and sometimes controversial content, the importance of addressing young people's concerns, and the broader implications of ignoring cultural issues in Canada's political discourse.

00:00 Introduction: Frustrations of Young Canadian Voters

00:07 The Struggles of the Middle Class

00:26 The Importance of Common Sense and Normalcy

01:34 Introduction to the Guest: Alexander Brown

02:08 Cultural Discussions in Conservative Politics

03:23 The Role of Without Diminishment

04:01 Challenges and Criticisms

05:27 The Need for Cultural Conversations

13:44 The Role of Economics in Politics

26:15 Project Ontario and Conservative Thought

28:31 Net Migration and Healthcare Challenges

28:57 Conservative Campaign Reflections

30:09 Economic Policies and Critiques

32:03 Leadership and Conservative Values

39:17 Mike Harris's Legacy

42:44 National Citizens Coalition

53:10 Challenges for Young People

56:47 Final Thoughts and Reflections

The French Enlightenment philosopher Montesquieu argued that international trade promotes peace. He called it doux commerce, gentle commerce. 

In what sense is this a conservative idea?

Fascinating and somewhat subversive discussion with Alexander Rosenthal-Pubul! 

AI Summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley interviews Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Pubul about his co-authored book 'The Wisdom of Our Ancestors: Conservative Humanism and the Western Tradition.' They discuss the evolution and definition of conservatism, its distinction from classical liberalism, and its intersection with nationalism and universalism. Dr. Rosenthal-Pubul offers insights on ancient versus modern liberty, the cultural impact of the Enlightenment, and the importance of maintaining humanism in education and society. This thought-provoking discussion delves into pressing issues in the conservative intellectual movement and the challenges of upholding a coherent conservative philosophy in contemporary times.

00:00 Introduction to Conservatism and Classical Liberalism

00:07 Enlightenment Ideas and Commerce

01:16 Introduction of Dr. Alexander Rosenthal-Pubul

01:38 Discussion on 'The Wisdom of Our Ancestors'

02:07 Nationalism vs. Universalism

02:21 Commerce and Conservatism

07:40 Classical Liberalism and Conservatism

09:49 Defining Conservatism

12:32 Education and Tradition

16:26 Universalism vs. Particularism

21:46 Nationalism and Post-Liberalism

28:43 Liberty and Coercion

32:17 Harmonizing Virtue and Liberty

33:28 The Paradox of Freedom and Rationality

34:29 The Enlightenment's Optimism and Its Limits

35:16 The Role of Culture in Human Behaviour

36:06 Balancing Enlightenment and Conservatism

40:11 The Evolution of Humanism

42:00 Classical, Christian, and Modern Humanism

46:01 The Instrumental View of Knowledge

50:42 Conservatism's Cultural Crisis

53:48 Final Thoughts on Conservatism and the West

Since the 1980s, conservatives have looked to economics for guidance: economic growth, tax cuts, and decreased government spending capture the heart of political thought in North American Conservative political parties.

This sparks two questions. 1) How well did this approach perform? and 2) Will this approach address current social concerns, such as infertility, mass immigration, ethnic unrest, drug supply, public safety, or 'medical assistance in dying'/euthanasia?

Economics is a powerful tool. But it remains silent on the most salient issues today. Dr. Tim Sargent PhD economics explains why.

AI Summary:

Join Shawn Whatley as he sits down with Tim Sargent, a PhD economist with 28 years of experience in the Canadian federal public service. Together, they explore what it means to be a Canadian and discuss whether economics alone can address today's pressing issues such as fertility rates, immigration, defense, security, and more. Tim shares his unique insights on the interplay between classical liberalism and conservatism and underscores the importance of loyalty, duty, and communal values. Don't miss this deep dive into the challenges and opportunities facing Canada today.

00:00 Introduction: Can Economics Save Canada?

01:12 Guest Introduction: Meet Tim Sargent

03:57 Defining Canadian Identity

05:43 The Role of Geography and History

10:11 Regional Differences in Canada

17:46 Economics as a Servant, Not a Master

21:38 The Limits of Economics

27:55 The Need for Broader Solutions

31:26 Shifting Immigration Debates in Canada

32:19 Economic and Social Strains of Immigration

32:39 Conservative and Left-Wing Perspectives on Immigration

34:29 Reevaluating Feminism and Women's Happiness

35:36 The Role of Economics in Policy Making

36:48 Conservatism vs. Classical Liberalism

37:24 The Appeal of Classical Liberalism

39:29 Conservatism's Empirical Approach

41:07 Challenges for Modern Conservatism

50:37 Economic Policies and Conservatism

01:01:47 The Fertility Crisis and Cultural Issues

What does human-centred care mean in a world of AI? Are doctors becoming obsolete, when it comes to decision making? When should we hand over our clinical judgement to AI?

I asked Ross Upshur for his thoughts on logical positivism. Are most doctors positivists?  

"Despite it being... as a philosophical and epistemological doctrine... been rather thoroughly discarded... a long time ago. It's the self understanding of our profession," Ross said.

Of course, ideas about what counts as knowledge are inseparable from our political assumptions. So although we do not mention politics in this episode, these ideas are core to how we approach medical 'systems', 'planning', and politics in general.

Articles:

"Three problems with big data and AI in medicine" (Chin-Yee & Upshur, 2019)

"Looking for rules in a world of exceptions: reflections on evidence-based practice" (Upshur, 2005)

Book:

How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine by Kathryn Montgomery (2012) 

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts with Shawn Whatley, we are joined by Dr. Ross Upshur, head of the Division of Clinical Public Health at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto. With over 30 years of experience in the intersection of theory and practice in medicine, Dr. Upshur provides a comprehensive discussion on the role of AI in medicine, the limitations of evidence-based practices, and the critical importance of human judgment and patient history. We explore the impacts of AI and big data on clinical care, the pitfalls of technological dependence, and the ethical ramifications of potential AI-driven healthcare. This thought-provoking conversation dives deep into the philosophical and practical aspects of modern medical practices, providing listeners with valuable insights into the future of healthcare and what it means to retain human-centered care in an increasingly automated world.

00:00 Introduction: Can AI Replace Doctors?

00:02 The Limits of Evidence in Clinical Practice

00:41 AI and Evidence-Based Medicine

01:03 Wearables and Real-Time Data: A Misguided Direction?

01:35 The Public's Frustration and Acceptance of AI

01:44 Human-Centered AI vs. Bot Care

02:19 Welcome and Guest Introduction

02:56 The Evolution of Evidence-Based Medicine

03:53 The Gap Between Theory and Practice

05:26 Patient Stories: The Heart of Clinical Medicine

10:21 AI's Role in Future Healthcare

11:00 The Challenges of Big Data and AI

14:18 Epistemological Concerns with AI

18:38 The Human Experience vs. Quantifiable Data

25:42 Clinical Tools and Judgment

32:38 The Role of Clinical Judgment in Patient Care

33:48 Challenges with Evidence-Based Medicine

34:10 Interprofessional Model of Care

35:29 The Inferential Gap in Medical Practice

38:08 Philosophical Perspectives on Medical Practice

40:02 The Future of Clinical Judgment in the Age of AI

43:27 The Importance of Practical Wisdom in Medicine

48:09 Concerns About AI and Automation in Medicine

53:31 Final Thoughts and Reflections

Grant Havers has been reading McLuhan for 30 years, and it shows in his new book "The Medium is Still the Message: Marshall McLuhan for Our Time."

It's rare to find a book so applicable to our time, especially one written by a philosophy prof! This book is excellent. I expect it will become THE book to reference when you write about McLuhan.

AI Summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley and guest Professor Grant Havers, chair of the Department of Philosophy at Trinity Western University, explore the enduring relevance of Marshall McLuhan's ideas. They discuss how McLuhan's theories help make sense of current technological phenomena such as artificial intelligence, social media, and autonomous weapon systems. Havers explains how McLuhan argued that the rise of the electric and digital ages marked the end of the print age, leading to significant cultural and political shifts. They also delve into the concept of how new media creates environments that shape human behavior and societal structures. Furthermore, the conversation touches on McLuhan's conservative perspectives, the implications for contemporary politics, and the challenges of living in a post-literate society. 00:00 Introduction to Marshall McLuhan's Relevance Today 00:19 The Death of Liberalism and the Rise of Digital Age 01:34 Welcome and Introduction of Professor Grant Havers 05:08 Marshall McLuhan's Biography and Early Life 12:44 Understanding 'The Medium is the Message' 18:39 The Impact of New Media on Society 24:15 Formal Causality and Autonomous Weapon Systems 28:48 Literate vs. Post-Literate Society 37:54 Critique of Post-Liberalism 40:58 Reflections on Historical Perception 42:16 The Evolution of Capitalism 47:54 The Paradox of Reality and Media 54:04 Literacy, Simultaneity, and Progress 01:00:19 Discarnate Identity and Gnosticism 01:17:04 McLuhan's Conservative Perspective

For more on this, check out Dr. Nicholson's guest post on Peter Boghossian: The Boomerang 

Our discussion tackles Trump, scientism, climate change, 'masculinity crisis' (Calum says it's an immaturity crisis), and much more. Links below and AI summary follows at the bottom:

Co-edited book: Climate Migration: Critical Perspectives for Law, Policy, and Research 

Check out Calum's Substack: Notes from the Isthmus 

You can find more of his work at the Danube Institute: 

Calum's Linktree 

AI Summary

Join Shawn Whatley as he interviews Dr. Calum Nicholson, a lecturer at the Cambridge PACE program and director of research at the Danube Institute, about the significant cultural shifts from the boomer generation to today. They delve into the differences in material security perspectives across generations, the role of science in society, the impact of neoliberalism, and discuss Dr. Nicholson's thoughts on climate change and the social sciences. Additionally, Dr. Nicholson provides insights into Hungary's unique cultural and political landscape, offering a comparative perspective on the Anglosphere and Central Europe. This engaging conversation is an eye-opener on various societal and philosophical questions. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share your thoughts in the comments below!

00:00 Introduction: The Boomer Generation and Cultural Shifts

00:42 The Crisis of Masculinity and Immaturity

01:04 Science and Society: The Role of Scientism

01:47 Interview Introduction: Dr. Calum Nicholson

02:21 The Boomerang: Impact of the Boomer Generation

04:44 Diagnosing Cultural Changes: Symptoms vs. Pathology

08:42 The Influence of Popular Culture: From Comic Books to Presidents

19:09 Generational Differences: Deep Waters vs. Shallow Waters

26:24 Neoliberalism and Its Cultural Impact

38:33 Climate Change and Social Science

45:28 Challenging Social Science Presuppositions

46:41 Science and Society: A Philosophical Inquiry

48:27 The Concept of Climate Change

53:22 The Role of Science in Society

57:34 COVID-19: A Case Study in Science and Policy

01:11:48 The Uncanny Valley of Political Empathy

01:14:39 Understanding Hungary's Unique Perspective

01:20:58 Concluding Thoughts and Future Work

We get a poor return on investment when it comes to education in Canada. Our math and reading scores are several years behind (even before Covid). Students are distracted by over 100 messages on their cellphones each day. And teachers cannot control their own classrooms.

We can do better, and Paige MacPherson shows how to do it.

AI summary:

In this episode of 'Concepts,' host Shawn Whatley discusses the significant impacts of smartphones and digital devices on student performance in schools with Paige MacPherson, the Associate Director of Education Policy at the Fraser Institute. They delve into the evidence showing declines in math and reading scores, changes in classroom environments due to digital distractions, and the need for policies banning smartphones in schools. The conversation also spans broader issues such as education quality, the importance of school choice, and insights into the Conservative movement in Canada. Paige shares her expertise on education policy and provides solutions for improving the quality of public education while stressing the differing educational needs of boys and girls. This compelling discussion is a must-watch for parents, educators, and policymakers aiming to understand and navigate the complexities of modern education.

00:00 The Impact of Smartphones on Classroom Performance

00:57 The Case for a Provincial Ban on Smartphones

01:15 Declining PISA Scores and Educational Outcomes

02:33 Introduction to the Episode and Guest

04:47 Smartphones: Benefits and Drawbacks for Students

07:33 Challenges of Implementing Smartphone Bans

11:12 Parental Perspectives on Smartphone Use

17:52 The Role of Technology in Modern Education

19:48 Conservatism Across Canadian Provinces

24:08 School Choice and Public School System

33:14 Reflecting on French Immersion and School Choices

34:04 The Case for Charter Schools and Specialized Education

35:18 The Myth of Wealthy Families in Independent Schools

36:19 The Tension Between Choice and Quality in Education

39:33 Challenges in Teacher Recruitment and Classroom Discipline

43:10 The Importance of Parental Choice and Accountability

45:37 The Decline of Standardized Testing and Curriculum Quality

52:54 The Need for Content-Rich and Rigorous Education

01:01:18 Addressing the Needs of Boys in the Education System

01:06:19 Concluding Thoughts and Final Remarks

Étienne-Alexandre speaks clearly for a new generation of non-left thinkers. He asks what might be the role of conservatism in the near future. He says we need to look beyond economic issues and start rebuilding culture.

Our episode ended a bit abruptly, but we only missed a formal goodbye.

Check out É-A's new book: https://amzn.to/46T1Udt

AI summary:

In this episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley sits down with Étienne-Alexandre Beauregard, an author, political staffer, and speech writer, to explore the resurgence of conservatism among Generation Z. Diving into themes from Beauregard's latest book, 'Anti Civilization: Why Our Societies Collapse From Within,' the discussion covers the importance of societal structures, cultural norms, and the quest for meaning in an age of unprecedented freedom. They examine the critical role of order and tradition, the impact of higher education on societal values, and the widening gaps between generations and social classes. Gain insights into why younger generations are gravitating towards conservative ideals and the essential elements needed to foster a cohesive and flourishing society.

00:00 Introduction: The Importance of Social Structures

01:28 Guest Introduction: Étienne-Alexander Beauregard

01:55 The Rise of Gen Z Conservatism

03:27 Discussion on Étienne's Book: Anti Civilization

16:12 Generational and Elite Gaps in Politics

24:11 The Quest for Meaning Among Gen Z

30:53 The Impact of Harm Reduction Policies

32:12 Defund the Police: A Critical Analysis

33:57 The Costs of Deconstruction

34:20 Multiculturalism and Woke Movements

40:03 Common Good Conservatism

48:29 Economics and Cultural Identity

54:05 Future Concerns and Reflections

Professors shape opinion; they shape culture. Do we want the kind of culture they promote?

Turning to his book, Tristin argues that Canada's world-famous policy failures are self-inflicted. He believes we could recover, if we would simply "stop punching ourselves in the n*ts."

Links

How Canadian universities became cheering sections for political violence.

Don't be Canada: How one country did everything wrong all at once.

X @TristinHopper

AI Summary:

Join Shawn Whatley and guest Tristin Hopper, author and columnist for the National Post, as they delve into the unsettling rise of political extremism in Canadian universities and the broader socio-political landscape of Canada. This episode explores Hopper's new book, 'Don't Be Canada: How One Country Did Everything Wrong All At Once,' highlighting the country's policy failures, unchecked extremism, and the hopeful path to restoration. Hopper shares insights on Canada's unique challenges, political violence celebrated by academics, and the decline of Canadian society through poorly managed policies. Don't miss this thought-provoking conversation on the current state and future of Canada.

00:00 Introduction: Canadian Universities and Political Violence

01:32 Guest Introduction: Tristan Hopper

03:10 Discussing the Article on Political Violence in Universities

06:02 The Radical Left in Academia

11:16 Self-Censorship Among Conservative Students

15:15 Introducing Tristan's New Book

19:50 Canada's Policy Failures and Unintended Consequences

23:14 Canada's Unique Challenges

23:31 Why These Topics?

24:58 Canada as a Cautionary Tale

26:05 High Trust Society and Complacency

28:42 The Role of Immigration

30:33 The Trudeau Factor

32:49 Crime and the Justice System

38:38 Activist Judges and Legal Reforms

42:57 Conservatism in Canada

47:25 Final Thoughts and Call to Action

Josh has a unique ability to bridge the gap between politics and life, philosophy and culture. His developed his skill comes from a deep discomfort with what he saw around him in the Republican Party. 

If you want to understand conservatism, American politics, the US constitution, and Burkean conservatism, have a listen. 

Josh's podcast: Saving Elephants https://www.savingelephantsblog.com/

AI summary:

 In this insightful episode, we dive deep into conservatism with special guest Josh Lewis, host of the podcast 'Saving Elephants.' Josh offers his in-depth perspective on the current state of American politics, traditional conservative thought, populism, and the challenges facing the Republican Party. The conversation also explores the economic outlook and moral responsibility of living within our means. Tune in to uncover the nuances between different conservative ideologies and their implications on both policy and practice.

00:00 Introduction to Conservative Thought

01:43 Meet Josh Lewis: Host of Saving Elephants

03:09 The Millennial Conservative Perspective

08:24 Trump and the Evangelical Influence

12:04 The Intellectual Tradition of Conservatism

22:25 Russell Kirk's Legacy and Critique

29:40 Modern Republican Party and Conservatism

35:50 The Struggle Between Power and Principles

36:23 Exploring Leo Strauss and Neoconservatism

36:56 Burke vs. Strauss: Universal Truths and Particularities

45:36 The Role of Elites in Society

52:46 The Constitution: A Conservative Perspective

01:04:30 Economic Concerns and Moral Responsibility

01:09:27 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Let me know what you think.

Shawn

AI Summary:

Responding to Tragedy: Honouring Charlie Kirk & Challenging Silence

In this deeply reflective episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley breaks from his usual avoidance of current events to address a tumultuous week marked by significant global incidents and the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Whatley details the week's harrowing events, including drone incursions by Russia, bombings in Yemen, political upheaval in France and Nepal, and a tragic stabbing in North Carolina. Central to the episode is a tribute to Charlie Kirk, highlighting his impact as an evangelical Christian and conservative voice. Whatley shares personal reflections on the courage to speak one's truth in the face of societal pressure and the importance of standing up against ideological bullying. The episode serves as a call to action for listeners to embrace honesty and courage in their daily lives.

00:00 Introduction and Current Events Overview

00:19 The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

02:07 Charlie Kirk's Legacy and Impact

05:47 Personal Reflections and Call to Action

18:31 Conservatism vs. Liberalism

22:23 Final Thoughts and Conclusion

Dr. George Nash has spent 50 years explaining all the strands that weave together into the collection of ideas we call conservatism.

The AI summary is surprisingly good, so I will simply point out the book links below:

The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America since 1945

Russel Kirk's Concise Guide to Conservatism

AI Summary:

Join us as we delve into the multifaceted world of conservatism with esteemed historian and author Dr. George Nash. Known for his seminal work 'The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945,' Dr. Nash discusses the various currents within conservatism, the importance of maintaining a broad sensibility, and the evolution of the movement over decades. From Reagan’s ecumenical leadership to the rise of Neoconservatism, and the challenges posed by modern populism and the internet age, this episode offers a comprehensive overview of conservative thought. Dr. Nash's reflections on persuasion versus division and the future of conservatism in America provide valuable insights for both scholars and enthusiasts.

00:00 Introduction to Conservative Wisdom

01:13 Welcome and Guest Introduction

02:38 The Conservative Intellectual Movement

03:34 Historical Context and Key Figures

10:20 The Rise of Neoconservatism

15:00 The Evolution of Conservative Thought

27:33 The Impact of the Internet and Social Media

30:43 Populism and Modern Conservatism

38:40 Trumpism and the End of Reagan Conservatism

44:42 The Tea Party Movement and Grassroots Rebellion

47:14 The Language of Liberty vs. The Language of War

53:48 Philosophical Underpinnings of Conservatism and Liberalism

01:04:48 The Future of Conservatism in America

Dr. Yuval Levin explains that we don't need to disagree less; we need to learn to disagree better. Unity does not mean unanimity. We should be hopeful, not simply optimistic.

Yuval has spent several decades trying to persuade conservatives to think beyond our favourite topics of limited government, liberty, and patriotism. He argues that we also need healthy institutions. He shares a nuanced view of progress and the need for elites that are worthy of admiration.

If you are on the non left, you need to know about Yuval and his writing.

Books mentioned:

American Covenant

A Time to Build

The Fractured Republic

And the MUST READ: The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left.

AI Summary

Dr. Yuval Levin, Director of Social, Cultural, and Constitutional Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, shares his insights on the American Constitution and the essence of living together in a free society. Dr. Levin discusses the importance of unity without unanimity, the role of citizens, and the need for gratitude towards institutions. He challenges the conservative movement to consider the value of institutions and structures, and to move beyond reflex assumptions of anti-government sentiment. Join us for a deep dive into American civic virtues, the role of Congress, and how we can foster a deeper affection for our country. Don't miss this thought-provoking conversation!

00:00 Introduction: The Nature of Disagreement

00:42 The Role of Citizenship in American Democracy

01:05 Political Parties and the Need for a Better Future

01:45 Guest Introduction: Dr. Yuval Levin

02:47 The Importance of Institutions and Gratitude

04:21 Starting the Conversation: Optimism vs. Hope

07:37 The Problem of Passivity in Modern Society

10:47 Unity Through Disagreement

19:01 The Balance of Majority Rule and Minority Rights

20:53 Universalism vs. Particularism in American Identity

26:28 Anthropology and Republicanism in American Politics

32:46 The Role of Institutions in Shaping Society

34:10 The Necessity of Virtue in Governance

36:43 Conservatism and the Importance of Institutions

43:28 Balancing Progress and Tradition

50:13 The Role of Congress and Representation

54:28 Patriotism and Civic Affection

01:02:07 The Danger of Ingratitude

This group baffles academics and exasperates leftists. Both left and right seeks to dismiss and minimize their impact. But they represent a large (and growing) demographic with a loose collection of ideas that cannot be ignored.

Nico Lagan offers a case in point. He is a popular and successful influencer on social media. He introduces himself as a conservative and a Christian. Behind the muscles and tattoos, you find an extremely active mind that refuses to suffer fools. He disciplines himself and expects the same of his politicians.

Here are links for topics we mention:

Political Orphans podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-political-orphans/id1792078161

Political Orphans YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJYLqRpfVUypqX6XiP76t0g 

Exercise as a promising agent against cancer, 2023 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10648074/

The reproducibility crisis in the age of digital medicine (Nature, 2019) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-019-0079-z

Thanks for checking it out!

AI Summary:

In this episode of the Concepts podcast, the host sits down with Nico Lagan, the host of the Political Orphans podcast. Nico shares his perspectives on the current political landscape, feeling disconnected from mainstream parties, and his personal journey that led him to become a political commentator. They delve into a wide range of topics including masculinity, the role of exercise, faith, and the challenges of modern politics. Nico also discusses the importance of speaking the truth, leading by example, and his motivations deeply rooted in his role as a father and follower of Jesus Christ. This conversation explores the need for authenticity, courage, and critical thinking in today's society.

00:00 Introduction: Political Orphans

00:27 Judgment and Stereotypes

01:22 Introducing Nico Lagan

02:19 Political Commentary and Audience Engagement

04:09 Challenges in Canadian Politics

06:22 Conservative Party Critique

12:40 Public Service and Political Detachment

13:42 Personal Struggles and Political Views

17:54 Media Influence and Political Adaptation

22:46 Authenticity and Public Perception

30:37 Faith and Truth in Politics

34:40 Defending Cultural and Religious Identity

36:57 The Role of Masculinity in Society

37:23 Personal Journey and Overcoming Adversity

38:31 The Importance of Male Role Models

47:10 Physical Fitness and Masculinity

54:19 Mind-Body Connection and Holistic Health

01:04:04 Political Reflections and Future Aspirations

01:06:41 Community Involvement and Local Leadership

01:07:50 Final Thoughts and Farewell

Andy Crooks spelled out what's at stake for Canada, and he explained what we must do to save it. Stark, fun, inspirational, and tragic.

I can't think of a better embodiment of the heart an soul of conservatism. You cannot seriously listen to Andy and walk away unchanged.

AI summary:

In this episode, Andy Crooks, a lawyer, author, and right-wing community organizer, shares his perspectives on conservative values, the importance of moral courage, and the threat of totalitarianism posed by modern technology. Reflecting on his experiences and deep-rooted beliefs, Andy discusses the cultural distinctiveness of Alberta, the concept of creative cleaning in capitalism, and the importance of standing up against societal lies. Tune in to explore how we can nurture future conservative leaders and maintain hope amidst growing challenges.

00:00 Introduction and Opening Thoughts

00:52 The Canadian Winter and Its Influence

01:41 A Darker Age: Technology and Totalitarianism

02:30 Introducing Andy Crooks

03:33 Andy Crooks' Background and Values

05:27 Community Involvement and Activism

12:49 Political Journey and Achievements

16:27 The Importance of Freedom and Responsibility

19:30 Creating an Atmosphere of Liberty

28:34 Conservatism and Capitalism

40:57 Historical Patterns of Totalitarianism

41:43 Moral Values vs. Economic Focus

42:09 Creative Cleaning and Political Challenges

42:33 Urban-Rural Divide in Politics

45:41 Canadian Governance and National Unity

49:57 The Canadian Winter Analogy

54:33 The Beaver as a National Symbol

58:10 Western Canadian Culture and Identity

01:02:51 Concerns for Canada's Future

Do check out his Substack https://substack.com/@navarrogenie 

Looking forward to hearing what you think!

Thanks again!

AI summary:

Special guest Dr. Marco Navarro-Genie, VP of Research at Frontier Center for Public Policy and founding president of the Haultain Research Institute, delves deep into Canadian political thought and identity. The conversation spans topics including Red Toryism, Michael Oakeshott, Mark Carney's political influence, and the evolving notions of conservatism. Dr. Navarro-Genie also critiques the idea of rationalism in politics and touches on the impact of technology and progressivism on modern society. Throughout, the episode offers insights into the complexities of Canadian national identity and the challenges facing conservatism today.

00:00 Introduction and Opening Thoughts

00:17 The Conservative Disposition

01:45 Guest Introduction: Dr. Marco Navarro Genie

02:21 Discussion on Red Toryism

02:55 Fragment Theory and Canadian Identity

17:24 Critique of Mark Carney

20:01 Defending Michael Oakeshott

25:40 Rationalism in Politics

34:32 Exploring Rationalism and Metaphysical Abstractions

35:34 The Importance of Experience in Politics

40:40 The Role of Government According to Oakeshott

42:18 Debating Oakeshott's Neutrality and Proceduralism

49:33 Understanding Leo Strauss and His Influence

01:00:58 The Future of Conservatism and Society

01:06:37 Concluding Thoughts and Reflections

This was not a light discussion, but I think you will find it well worth your time.

Articles mentioned:

Wandering Thoughts

Artificial, human and angelic intelligence

Sean is Associate Editor of Country Squire Magazine

AI summary:

Exploring Consciousness and AI: A Deep Dive with Sean Walsh In this thought-provoking episode of Concepts, host Shawn Whatley engages in a rich conversation with Sean Walsh, Associate Editor of Country Squire Magazine.

With a background in philosophy of artificial intelligence, Sean Walsh shares his intriguing journey from a university teacher and police officer to a profound thinker and writer.

The discussion delves into the philosophy of walking, the deep mysteries of consciousness, and the intricate overlaps between AI and political philosophy. Walsh's brutal honesty and deep insights provide a fresh perspective on the limitations of AI, the metaphysics of self-consciousness, and the significance of embodiment.

This episode also explores the role of conservatism and liberalism in understanding these complex topics. A must-watch for anyone interested in philosophy, AI, and the fundamental questions of human existence.

00:00 The Miracle of Human Consciousness

00:24 Introduction to the Podcast and Guest

01:38 Sean Walsh's Background and Role at Country Squire Magazine

07:18 Exploring the Philosophy of Walking

23:24 The Intersection of AI and Philosophy

26:56 The Incoherence of Limited Materialism

27:57 The Ethics of AI and Transhumanism

28:53 Angels as a Metaphor for Self-Consciousness

29:17 The Impossibility of Creating Conscious Machines

29:48 The Limits of AI and Human Intelligence

36:55 The Chinese Room Argument and AI Limitations

39:13 Conservatism vs. Liberalism in AI and Consciousness

48:21 The Role of Law and National Identity

50:20 The Search for Meaning in a Technological World

52:56 Concluding Thoughts and Future Discussions

Books and articles mentioned:

Conservatism Past and Present: A philosophical introduction, by Tristan Rogers https://amzn.to/4lYHPbC

England: An Elegy, by Roger Scruton https://amzn.to/4lMKkOe

Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present, by Jerry Muller https://amzn.to/40B4D8V

After Hume's Justice, by Rosalind Hursthouse https://www.jstor.org/stable/4545138

The Women Are Up to Something: How Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot, Mary Midgley, and Iris Murdoch Revolutionized Ethics, by Benjamin Lipscomb https://amzn.to/3GVNbp4

AI summary:

Exploring Conservative Philosophy with Dr. Tristan Rogers:

An In-Depth Discussion Join us for an engaging conversation with Dr. Tristan Rogers as we delve into his book, 'Conservatism Past and Present: A Philosophical Introduction'. In this episode, we discuss the essence of philosophical conservatism, its compatibility with philosophy, and the challenges of explaining conservatism's various dimensions. Dr. Rogers shares insights on the common good, the importance of societal structures for virtue, and the differences between conservative and liberal ideas. We also touch on modern conservatism, the impact of Trump on the movement, and how to foster a shared sense of direction in society. This thought-provoking discussion is both rigorous and accessible, offering something for everyone interested in conservative thought.

00:00 Introduction to Philosophical Conservatism

01:13 Conversation with Dr. Tristan Rogers

01:54 Exploring Conservatism: Philosophy vs. Politics

03:20 Conservatism in Modern Society

04:26 Dr. Rogers' Academic Journey

07:41 Philosophical Conservatism and Human Nature

12:35 The Role of Tradition and Reason

20:46 Conservatism vs. Liberalism: A Deep Dive

26:44 The Importance of Shared Values and Norms

37:53 The Decline of Social Norms

38:53 Cultural Differences: Mediterranean vs. British

40:13 National Character and Conservatism

47:01 Modern Conservatism and Fusionism

52:22 The Future of Conservatism

52:44 Conservatism in the Modern World

01:01:39 Final Thoughts and Reflections

People find this hard to believe, and system planners find it horrifying.

Canadian medicare was once the envy of the world. Today, countries try to avoid creating 'Canada-like' results.

Dr. Day reviews his book and the Cambie Surgery court case.

Dr. Day's book: https://amzn.to/40XuIPC

AI summary:

In this insightful episode, join host Shawn as he interviews Dr. Brian Day, a distinguished orthopedic surgeon and the author of 'My Fight for Canadian Healthcare: A 30-Year Battle to Put Patients First.' Dr. Day shares his personal journey, starting in the 1970s, through the golden era of Canadian medical practice to the present day challenges within the healthcare system. The discussion delves into the bureaucratic obstacles, government policies, and legal battles that impede patient care, focusing on the controversial case surrounding Cambie Surgery Centre. Dr. Day also highlights the hypocrisy in Canada's healthcare system, where private health insurance remains illegal while many, including government officials, seek private care. Join us to explore Dr. Day's relentless advocacy, the systemic flaws he aims to correct, and his unwavering hope for the future of Canadian healthcare.

00:00 The Economic and Human Cost of Wait Lists

01:47 Introducing Dr. Brian Day and His Journey

02:03 The Golden Era of Medical Practice

03:37 Challenges and Innovations in Healthcare

04:40 Anecdotes and Personal Stories

05:36 The Reality of Medical Care in the 1970s

09:20 Myths and Realities of Tommy Douglas

23:37 Hypocrisy in the Healthcare System

31:06 The Role of Commissions and Task Forces

32:23 Inside Cambie Surgery Clinic

33:31 Positive Culture at Cambie

34:06 Independent Surveys and Staff Satisfaction

35:13 Challenges in Public Hospitals

37:54 Flexibility and Workforce Retention

38:43 Government Policies and Legal Battles

46:10 Court Case Details and Frustrations

50:27 Reflections on the Legal System

57:54 Global Healthcare Comparisons

01:03:28 Maintaining Hope and Perspective

01:06:43 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

The fusion of public and private represents a new era of actually existing postliberalism.

https://firstthings.com/actually-existing-postliberalism/

https://pinkoski.substack.com/

AI summary:

Institutional Shifts and Global Politics

In this episode, Dr. Nathan Pinkoski, a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, discusses his work on postliberalism and the significant institutional changes over the past 40 years. Dr. Pinkoski explores the transition from a liberal framework to a postliberal world, highlighting the fusion of state and society. He examines the role of key events like 9/11, the 2008 financial crisis, and the 2022 Russian sanctions, revealing how these shaped modern governance. Dr. Pinkoski also touches upon his forthcoming book and his views on influential thinkers like Alasdair MacIntyre. The episode culminates in a discussion about the evolving political landscape and the impact of charismatic leaders like Barack Obama and Justin Trudeau.

00:00 Introduction to Postliberalism

00:08 Institutional Changes Over the Past 40 Years

01:22 The Fusion of State and Society

01:44 Interview with Dr. Nathan Pinkoski

03:40 Alasdair MacIntyre and Liberalism

10:17 The Quiet Revolution of the 1990s

31:15 The Role of NGOs in Extending State Power

33:43 Organized Irresponsibility and NGO Influence

34:43 The Evolution of State and NGO Relationships

36:30 Digital Services Act and Internet Censorship

38:48 Financial Influence and Geopolitical Power

42:14 Post-2001 Geopolitical Shifts

46:19 The Fusion of State and Society

51:46 The Role of Charismatic Leaders in Politics

57:47 Scapegoating in Political History

01:00:36 Closing Thoughts and Future Work

We tackle loneliness and social isolation, individualism, and (briefly) social response to suffering.

Not a light episode, but a crucial topic to discuss.

Thanks for checking it out!

AI Summary:

We delve into the rapid growth and normalization of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) in Canada, now one of the leading causes of death in the country. Dr. Rebecca Vachon, Health Program Director at Cardus Institute in Ottawa, shares her expertise on the subject, highlighting key findings from reports on euthanasia and the broader implications for Canadian healthcare. The conversation addresses ethical, legal, and social aspects of MAiD, comparing Canada's approach with other countries and exploring the complexities of autonomy and consent. We also touch on related issues such as palliative care, social isolation, and how faith communities play a role in alleviating loneliness. This episode offers a comprehensive look at the controversial and evolving landscape of assisted dying in Canada.

00:00 Introduction: The Rapid Expansion of MAiD in Canada

01:01 Interview with Dr. Rebecca Vachon

02:34 Summary of the Report: From Exceptional to Routine

04:39 Factors Contributing to the Growth of MAiD

07:24 Comparing International Approaches to Assisted Dying

10:06 Autonomy and Consent in MAiD

10:59 Cultural and Procedural Normalization of MAiD

14:12 Public Opinion and Concerns about MAiD

26:30 Palliative Care and Its Challenges

39:19 Social Isolation and Loneliness

49:37 Conclusion: Society's Response to Suffering

Canada is young: many Canadians alive now are more than 1/2 as old as Canada itself. Given its youth, what exactly is Canada? What aspects do we hope to pass on to our children and grandchildren?

Whatever Canada is it must be "planted deep in the affections of the people...it must be in the hearts of the people." I read the full quote from John S. Sanborn in the recording.

Thanks so much for checking this out! Please subscribe and 'like'. It really helps.

AI Summary:

Reflecting on Canada Day: What Does It Mean to Be Canadian?

Join us in celebrating Canada Day by delving into the meaning of being Canadian. The speaker reminisces about traditional celebrations and explores deeper questions about national identity, inspired by John S. Sanborn's thoughts from Canada's Founding Debates in 1865. This introspective video challenges viewers to consider what values and principles will sustain Canada in the future. Happy Canada Day, or Dominion Day as it was once called!

00:00 Introduction and Canada Day Greetings

00:09 Reflecting on Canada Day Traditions

00:34 Exploring Canada's Founding Debates

01:25 John Sanborn's Vision of Canada

04:13 Personal Reflections on Canadian Identity

05:33 Concluding Thoughts and Canada Day Wishes

He ran circles around me having clearly argued almost all my points many times before. He called out my hypocrisy at being intolerant of paying protesters while being ok with all the other money that flows around inside politics.

Adam forced me to face reality. I am still opposed to paying protesters, but I do not have a proper solution for it yet (and all the other conflicts of interest we discussed).

A spicy discussion!

AI summary:

In this episode, Shawn dives deep into the world of paid protests with Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand, the largest protest company in the U.S. Adam discusses the ethical, practical, and social implications of paying individuals to participate in protests. He defends the practice by highlighting the opportunity costs for potential protestors and draws parallels to various economic incentives present in other sectors. Shawn and Adam engage in a friendly debate, examining moral boundaries, the commoditization of activism, and the broader influence of money in politics. The discussion also covers differences between violent and peaceful protests and features many real-world examples from both sides of the political spectrum. Join them for a thought-provoking conversation that challenges some commonly held beliefs about advocacy and influence in a capitalist society.

00:00 Introduction to the Largest Protest Company

01:02 The Ethics of Paid Protests

01:45 Debating the Morality of Paid Protests

04:51 Adam Swart's Perspective on Paid Protests

07:17 The Reality of Paid Protests

16:07 Global Perspective on Paid Protests

17:15 Commoditization of Protests and Other Concepts

27:46 The Flexibility of Protest Participation

28:16 Grassroots Protests: A Deeper Look

30:12 The Politics of Incentives

31:58 The Ethics of Paid Advocacy

37:43 Protests and Public Perception

41:07 Legal and Ethical Boundaries in Protests

43:04 Balancing Morality and Business in Advocacy

45:56 Left vs. Right: Who Hires Paid Protestors?

48:49 Final Thoughts and Reflections

Dr. Alford explains why we need both more history and more enthusiasm to put government in its place. He ends with a message of hope for rescuing Canada.

Seven Absolute Rights: Recovering the Historical Foundations of Canada's Rule of Law

AI summary:

We delve into the depths of constitutional history and law with Dr. Ryan Alford, a professor at Lakehead University's Bora Laskin Faculty of Law. Dr. Alford shares insights from his book 'Seven Absolute Rights' and discusses the importance of understanding historical traditions in constitutional law. The conversation covers Canada's rule of law, the invocation of the Emergencies Act, and the significance of nonderogable rights. This episode also highlights the differences between practical wisdom and cleverness in legal contexts, the impact of historical understanding on contemporary issues, and the role of disputation in uncovering truth.

00:00 Introduction: The Importance of History

00:46 Exciting Episode with Ryan Alfred

01:09 Discussion on Constitutional Issues in Canada

02:59 Interview with Dr. Ryan Alford

03:19 Exploring 'Seven Absolute Rights'

04:03 COVID-19 and Constitutional Norms

06:33 Nonderogable Rights and Historical Context

10:29 The Rule of Law and Its Challenges

19:10 Common Law and Legal Philosophy

31:09 Government Power and Legal Restraints

35:22 Lincoln's Argument and Constitutional Implications

36:02 Practical Wisdom vs. Cleverness in Governance

37:31 Sophistry and Philosophy in Legal Tradition

39:44 The Role of History in Modern Legal Theory

43:28 Hegelian Influence on Contemporary Thought

48:36 The Timeless Relevance of Greek Tragedy

56:18 Rationalism and the Quest for Knowledge

58:38 Hope for Canada's Constitutional Future

Dr. Pitt offers an attractive view beyond the status-quo liberalism in which all political parties operate, for the most part.

Plenty of laughs, profound points, and notable quotes. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

Books mentioned:

Intellectual Conservatism: From Burke to Scruton https://amzn.to/45TH52o 

Post-Liberal Turn and the Future of Conservatism https://tudasportal.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.12944/100656/webpdf_PITT__BLOND_Post_Liberal_Turn_and_the_Future_of_Conservatism.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 

AI Summary:

The Essence of Conservatism: A Deep Dive with Dr. Daniel Pitt Join us for an insightful discussion with Dr. Daniel Pitt, research fellow at the University of Buckingham, as we explore the core principles and philosophical underpinnings of conservatism. Dr. Pitt, co-editor of the upcoming book 'Intellectual Conservatism,' shares his thoughts on the importance of family, the organic nature of society, and the role of trial and error in political philosophy. Tune in for a thought-provoking conversation on the complexities and contradictions inherent in conservative thought, and the importance of looking to history and tradition for guidance. Don't forget to subscribe for more enriching content!

00:00 Introduction to Conservative Thought

00:58 Meet Dr. Daniel Pitt

02:01 The Essence of Conservatism

03:02 Starting the Conversation

04:16 The Mustache Story

05:38 Diving into the Chapter

07:24 Proto-Conservatives and Historical Context

12:51 Analyzing Conservative Schools of Thought

18:40 Ideology vs. Disposition vs. Way of Life

23:39 The Influence of Michael Oakeshott

30:59 The Conservative Statesman's Role

32:18 Principles of Conservative Reform

33:55 Philosophical Conservatism

34:52 The Importance of Reflection in Conservatism

37:07 Epistemology and Conservatism

47:44 Constitutional Rhetoric and Pathos

52:39 The Organic Nature of Society

58:14 The Role of Family in Conservatism

59:49 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

European conservatism doesn't suffer from the North American tendency to confuse conservatism with classical liberalism. Professor Hörcher has spent decades unpacking a philosophy of conservatism.

New Book fall 2025: Intellectual Conservatism: From Burke to Scruton https://amzn.to/4mJ6D8r

AI Summary:

In this episode, we engage in a deep and insightful conversation with Dr. Ferenc Hörcher, head of the Research Institute for Politics and Government at LudoVica University of Public Service in Hungary. Dr. Hörcher provides an exploration into European conservatism, contrasting it with North American interpretations, and delves into the philosophical underpinnings of conservatism with a focus on intellectual conservatism. We discuss the virtues of prudence and moderation, the significance of family and smaller communities, and the continuous influence of Roger Scruton's work on modern conservative thought. Dr. Hörcher also touches upon the delicate balance between universal and particular values, offering a nuanced perspective on the role and importance of intellectual debates in shaping conservative thought. Don't miss this compelling dialogue that blends historical context with contemporary political philosophy.

00:00 Introduction and Personal Reflections

01:34 European Conservatism vs. Classical Liberalism

03:47 Guest Introduction: Dr. Ferenc Hörcher

05:49 Hungary's Political Landscape

09:04 Conservatism and Liberty

12:15 Intellectual Conservatism: From Burke to Scruton

13:48 The Role of Intellectuals in Conservatism

19:16 Philosophy vs. Ideology in Conservatism

26:15 Knowledge Constraints and Practical Wisdom

29:17 The Role of Community Wisdom

32:07 Philosophical Hermeneutics and Gadamer's Concept of Tact

38:50 The Tension Between Universalism and Particularism

40:23 Christian Aristotelian Perspective on Community

47:10 Conservative Republicanism and Local Engagement

52:32 Final Thoughts and Reflections

I asked Peter all the most provocative political questions I could imagine. What might the Pope think about resource development, immigration, pluralism, and social equality. Peter offered answers I haven't found elsewhere.

I hope you enjoy the conversation!

AI Summary:

In-Depth Discussion on Pope Leo XIV and Catholic Social Thought In this episode, host Shawn engages in a comprehensive discussion with public policy expert Peter Copeland about the newly elected Pope Leo XIV. They delve into the Pope's surprising election, his historical namesake Pope Leo XIII, and the significance of Catholic social teaching. The conversation explores complex topics such as the Pope's potential policies on unions, poverty, unity, and social equity, along with theological debates between Augustine and Aquinas. The episode also touches on practical issues like resource development, environmental change, immigration policies, and global moral issues. Peter provides a balanced perspective that highlights the core principles of Catholic social thought, offering hope for the future leadership of Pope Leo XIV.

00:00 Introduction and Renewed Interest in Pope Leo's Election

00:55 Guest Introduction: Peter Copeland

01:07 Diving into Pope Leo the 14th

04:14 Catholic Social Teaching and Modern Implications

10:58 Balancing Authority and Freedom: Augustine vs. Aquinas

17:19 Resource Development and Environmental Concerns

21:52 Global Conflicts and Moral Issues

28:37 Immigration, Pluralism, and National Identity

45:41 Postliberalism and Catholic Integralism

49:57 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

David says we need universals to resist postmoderns. I say we should fear universals lest the postmoderns inflict us with their 'values'.

In this episode we resolve the debate (sort of). Thanks for watching!

Please (please!) subscribe. :-)

AI summary:

Navigating Truth and Tradition: A Deep Dive with Dr. David Livingstone on Canadian Political Thought

In this episode, we delve into deep political and philosophical discussions with Dr. David Livingstone, a professor of liberal and political studies at Vancouver Island University. We explore the complex interplay between universal truths and particular historical experiences, focusing on the ideas of Capital T Truth and the practical politics of Canada's founding. Our conversation centers around Dr. Livingstone's chapter on Thomas D'Arcy McGee, one of Canada’s founding figures, and his civic nationalism, as discussed in the book 'Canadian Conservative Political Thought.' Join us for a profound exploration of the roots of Canadian identity, the challenges posed by postmodernism, and the enduring relevance of historical conventions in shaping a nation's values and governance.

00:00 Introduction to the Debate on Truth

00:43 Exploring Universal Values and Relativism

01:18 David Livingston's Perspective on Capital T Truth

02:54 Thomas D'Arcy McGee's Civic Nationalism

07:34 McGee's Views on Canadian Identity and Democracy

10:58 The Tension Between Universal and Particular Truths

15:41 McGee's Thoughts on Aristocracy and Education

20:03 Balancing Liberty and Stability in Canada

23:23 The Role of Philosophy and Education in Nation-Building

26:31 Reconciling Historical Empiricism and Universal Truths

38:29 The Evolution of Vocabularies and Human Nature

39:15 The Importance of Constitutional Order

41:28 The Role of Liberal Studies in Understanding Life's Purpose

42:34 Challenges Facing Liberal Studies Programs

43:21 The Decline of Constitutional Awareness

47:23 The Importance of Historical Context in Law

59:24 The Role of Universities in Shaping Society

01:03:09 Concluding Thoughts and Call to Action

Pro-Hamas protests block streets in Toronto. They have even forced ambulances to turn around. This has really bothered me. Aside from basic procedural solutions -- keeping a lane open for emergency vehicles or having police enforce the law -- can we solve the deeper, existential issue this raises for Canada? 

I think we have an opportunity to reclaim sanity from the fevered anger and protest that has invaded from outside our borders.

AI summary below:

The Role of Friendship in Politics: A Deep Dive with Professor John von Heyking

In this episode, host Shawn and Professor John von Heyking, Chair of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Lethbridge, discuss the complex intersection of friendship and political philosophy. They explore Aristotle's views on virtues, political friendship, and civic responsibility, applying these concepts to modern-day Canada. The conversation covers recent social and political events, including pro-Palestine protests in Toronto, the impact of high immigration levels, and the idea of leisure in political life. This thought-provoking discussion aims to provide insights into how we can improve Canada and understand politics better.

00:00 Introduction to Virtue and Friendship

00:14 Political Community and Leisure

01:07 Current Events and Moral Reflections

01:45 Introducing Professor John Von Heyking

02:18 The Role of Friendship in Political Virtue

03:13 Aristotle's Virtues and Friendship

08:41 Defining Political Friendship

13:45 Aristotle's Knowledge Types and Practical Wisdom

22:15 Friendship as a Universal and Particular Concept

25:22 Common Law vs. Top-Down Legislation

27:55 The Common Law Model and Canadian Identity

28:30 Friendship and the Notion of the Foreigner

29:33 Aristotle's View on Citizenship and Equality

31:23 Conservative Views on Immigration

32:37 Protests and the Concept of Friendship

37:01 Political Prudence and Balancing Goods

38:45 Kindness and COVID-19

40:37 Transactional Nature of Modern Politics

43:13 Friendship and the Individual vs. Person Debate

47:15 Aristotle on Leisure and Political Activity

51:15 Final Thoughts on Political Friendship

Universalism is an essential concept to help us understand modern politics. It's a core pillar of liberalism, but many 'conservatives' are universalists also.

AI Summary

Understanding Universalism: A Deep Dive into Modern Political Philosophy In this episode, we explore the concept of universalism and its impact on contemporary politics. Using quotes from political philosopher Michael Freeden and examples from figures such as Prime Ministers Justin Trudeau and Mark Carney, we delve into how universal values are perceived and implemented in national and international contexts. The script also contrasts universalism with particularism, drawing on historical and current examples, including President Donald Trump's foreign policy. The discussion underscores the importance of situating values within historical and cultural contexts to better understand their application and efficacy in governance.

00:00 Introduction to Universalism

01:46 Defining Universalism

02:27 Examples of Universalism in Politics

06:24 Universalism vs. Particularism

09:45 Universalism in Practice

12:07 Personal Reflections on Universalism

18:44 Conclusion: The Importance of Understanding Universalism

In this short segment, I offer a place to start talking about liberalism: a theory with 4 pillars. The first pillar we discuss is individualism. We will discuss conservatism in other episodes. 

Part 1 of a 4-part series on liberalism

AI summary below:

Unpacking Liberalism: Understanding its Core Concepts and Individualism

In this episode, we embark on a detailed exploration of liberalism, tracing its origins back to the early 19th century and dissecting its various forms—old fashioned, philosophical, and modern. The focus is on understanding political terminology, the evolution of key political ideologies, and the foundational pillars of liberalism: individualism, egalitarianism, universalism, and meliorism. We delve into the nuances of individualism, discussing its implications in real-life scenarios and its historical roots in the ideas of John Stuart Mill. Join us as we clarify the complexities of political theory and its relevance in today's society.

00:00 Introduction to Liberalism

00:50 Understanding Political Terminology

01:09 Defining Liberalism

02:00 The Evolution of Political Isms

06:28 Core Concepts of Liberalism

07:13 Focus on Individualism

12:57 Challenges of Individualism in Practice

15:30 Conclusion and Upcoming Topics

Thanks for listening!

AI Summary

Shawn interviews Geoff Russ, a Vancouver-based writer, about the evolving concept of Canadian nationalism and identity. They discuss the need for newcomers to understand their obligations, the distinction between Canadian and American ideals, and the impact of progressive internationalism. Geoff Russ shares his views on post-nationalism, the importance of Canada's rugged history, and the challenges of maintaining a high-trust society. The conversation also touches on the failures of neoconservatism, the need for a positive vision of Canadian identity, and practical steps to revive a distinct Canadian culture. Don't miss this in-depth discussion on what it means to be Canadian in the modern era.

00:00 Introduction: Obligations and Civilization

00:21 Canadian Identity and Nationalism

00:50 Interview with Geoff Russ: Essays and Ideas

01:41 Post Nationalism and Modern Challenges

05:09 The Role of History and Freedom in Canada

10:18 Urban Issues: Vancouver's Downtown East Side

11:55 Government Responsibility and Individual Agency

16:17 Canada's National Identity Crisis

21:18 High Trust Society and Optimism for the Future

23:02 Rebuilding Canadian Nationalism

23:27 Citizenship and Cultural Unity

25:53 Historical Context and Identity

29:31 Neoconservatism and Modern Politics

34:53 Economic Policies and Free Market Debate

43:13 Canadian Identity and Resource Jobs

44:04 Concluding Thoughts and Future Questions

I got too excited with the discussion and stopped paying attention to the recording quality. It's less than I would have hoped, but the content Grant shares is excellent.

I offer a longer summary than usual. Thanks for checking it out!

AI summary:

In this episode, we discuss with Grant Havers, Chair of the Department of Philosophy at Trinity Western University, his book 'Leo Strauss and Anglo-American Democracy: A Conservative Critique.' We dive into several key topics, including the concept of universals within liberal political philosophy, the idea of the open society and its potential threats to democracy, and the principle of Fusionism blending tradition with free market thinking. The conversation also covers the intricate relationship between conservatism and capitalism, the role of Christianity in political philosophy, and future technological impacts like AI and transhumanism. Despite technical issues with the recording, this engaging discussion is valuable for those interested in political philosophy and Canadian conservatism. 00:00 Introduction to the Episode 00:54 Key Discussion Points 05:39 Introducing Grant Havers 05:59 Diving into Leo Strauss 11:44 Universals and Historical Context 20:34 Neoconservatism and the Managerial State 25:57 Strauss's Concerns on Open Society 31:30 Conservatism and Anti-Communism: A Complex Relationship 32:46 Misconceptions About Conservatism 34:55 Fusionism in Conservative Thought 37:02 The Tension Between Conservatism and Capitalism 42:55 Strauss's Views on Reason and Revelation 50:20 Hegelian Philosophy and Historical Necessity 57:33 Technological Change and Its Implications 01:00:13 Closing Thoughts and Future Discussions

I hope you enjoy the episode!

AI summary:

In this episode, Shawn dives into Canadian political thought with Dr. Jodi Bruhn. They explore topics such as the conservatism of Pierre Poilievre, political and social myths that shape Canada, the comparison between Canadian conservatism and American Republicanism, and the implications of government actions during the COVID-19 pandemic on civil liberties. Dr. Bruhn also touches on her work related to Indigenous affairs and the complex dynamics within Canadian politics today. This episode is a deep dive into varied and complex political ideas that are crucial for understanding Canada's current climate.

If you want to understand Canadian politics, you simply have to spend time digging into Alberta. Ted has a great sense of humour and seems to love chatting about the thorniest political issues. He jokes that he doesn't have to worry about what he says now that he's retired.

I hope you enjoy the episode as much as I did!

In just under 5 minutes, I explain why we need to focus on political ideas now, and why philosophical conservatism offers a (paradoxically) new and fresh way to think.

If you agree and think that this is a worthy quest, please click like and subscribe. It seems like a small thing, but it makes a huge difference. Reviews, comments, and feedback greatly improve the chance of a podcast's survival, no matter where you find it.

Also, please consider becoming a supporter through my Patreon (coming soon)

Thanks again. I look forward to hearing from you soon!

Shawn

We start out with four familiar comments or questions:

1. Is the Conservative Party uncaring, especially about people in need?
2. Will Pierre Poilievre end up spending as much as Mark Carney?
3. The CBC is Canadian. Isn't it a trusted source for unbiased information?
4. Carney is really nothing like Justin Trudeau.

Then we get into meatier fare:

1. Biggest missed opportunities in the election?
2. Should we listen to separatist fear mongering? 
3. What's required to rebuild Canada-USA relations?
4. If Carney wants to implement Trudeau 2.0, do we have the capacity to even try?

Please like, subscribe, and share a comment -- Thank you!!

In this episode, Shawn interviews Professor Jeremy Geddert about George Grant, renowned Canadian philosopher and author of 'Lament for a Nation'. They delve into Grant's critique of the Laurentian elite, his perspectives on Canadian nationalism, conservatism, and his critique of contemporary progressive politics. Geddert examines Grant's views on state and identity, comparing left and right Hegelian philosophies, as well as addressing the evolution of Canadian nationalism and its distinction from American identity. The discussion also touches on historical perspectives and the implications for Canada's future.

What will America want in return for an improved trade relationship? Will we have to change policies on supply management, internet regulation, and customs?

We end by discussing the shifting political dynamics among the so-called ‘tech bros' and their alignment with conservative politics, and what that might mean for Canada.

The stakes couldn’t be higher for this election. I hope you enjoy the episode.

United Farmers’ Associations, Social Credit, CCF, and Reform — they all shared a bottom-up, grassroots energy fuelled by frustration over disdain from elites and inattentive government.

Having spent his life giving speeches and talking about Canada, Preston can fire off enough details about Canada to make anyone feel inspired by what we have and humbled we do not know it better.

Preston combines passion and energy while remaining open to divergent ideas. He seems to just keep rolling forward, with alacrity! 

Video of the episode is on youtube.com/@ConceptsWithShawnWhatley

He has found a way to package complex ideas in a format that most high-school students could manage. Order through his website or Amazon.

AI summary and chapters:

Dr. Arney Lange, a former medical researcher and current internist in Ottawa, unpacks the complexities of conservatism in Canadian politics. With a background that includes teaching, military service, and authorship of four books on political theory, Dr. Lange explores the different facets of conservatism, ranging from liberation to conservation. He discusses the historical context, the role of private property in environmentalism, and how citizenship responsibilities play into the larger national narrative. Don't miss this deep dive into political thought, enriched by Dr. Lange's unique poetic perspective.

00:00 Introduction to Dr. Arney Lange

00:53 Defining Conservatism in Canadian Politics

02:27 The Seven Types of Conservatives

02:52 The Freedom Axis and Its Implications

03:34 The Conservation Axis and Its Types

05:33 Motivations Behind Dr. Lange's Work

14:08 The Ship of State Metaphor

19:30 Democracy and Political Legitimacy

30:32 Influence of American Constitutional Ideas

32:15 Debating John Locke's Philosophy

38:59 Identity Politics and Its Impact

45:55 Environmentalism and Conservatism

52:01 A Patriotic Canadian Poem

56:27 Conclusion and Farewell

Including unique insights and experiences, Dr. Eappen is probably the only gay, Conservative, monarchist, first-generation immigrant, endocrinologist in Canada, or perhaps anywhere in the world.

Enjoy

AI summary and chapters:

Exploring Conservatism in Canada with Dr. Roy Eappen In this episode, we sit down with Dr. Roy Eappen, an assistant professor of medicine at McGill University and a long-time conservative activist in Canada. Dr. Eappen discusses the state of conservatism, the importance of constitutional monarchy, and the challenges within the conservative movement. We delve into his work with the organization 'Do No Harm,' which seeks to combat the influence of 'woke' policies in medicine, particularly concerning transgender youth treatments. Additionally, Dr. Eappen shares his views on immigration, the role of religion in public life, and the current political landscape in Canada. Join us for an insightful conversation about maintaining and evolving conservative values in today's world.

00:00 Introduction to Constitutional Monarchies

01:02 Meet Dr. Roy Eappen 01:43 Conservatism in Canadian Politics

02:56 Challenges Within the Conservative Party

04:55 The Role of Ideas in Conservatism

06:11 Support for the Monarchy

07:27 Work with Do No Harm

09:26 Views on Transgender Youth Policies

11:58 Canada's Response to Medical Reviews

18:28 Personal Background and Immigration Story

19:29 Political Figures and Free Trade

23:21 The Liberal Fix: Can It Work?

23:28 Mr. Carney's Influence and Conflicts

24:04 Addressing Average Canadians' Concerns

24:28 Identity Politics and Climate Change

25:28 Skepticism on Climate Spending

27:03 The Role of Religion in Public Life

29:25 Cultural and Civic Identity in Canada

32:05 The Importance of Civics Education

33:04 Conservatism vs. Liberalism

34:05 The Value of Aesthetics and Architecture

37:00 Cancel Culture and Its Impact

37:45 Concluding Thoughts on Canada's Future

In each case, Daniel corrected misconceptions with evidence. He also offered hope for the future. MEI has launched a Liberty and Leadership program to help train the next generation of government leaders on the fundamentals of classical economics and social policy.

You can watch the episode on YouTube at Concepts with Shawn Whatley

AI summary:

In this episode, Shawn interviews Daniel Dufort, president of the MEI (formerly Montreal Economic Institute), to discuss pressing economic issues. They delve into the impact of tariffs, the inefficiency they create, and why free trade and economic liberalism are crucial for robust economies. Daniel shares insights on the need for removing interprovincial trade barriers, which hinder economic growth in Canada. The conversation also covers the housing crisis, emphasizing the importance of increasing supply to tackle affordability and regulatory hurdles that stifle construction. Additionally, Daniel introduces MEI's Liberty and Leadership program, aimed at fostering classical liberal values among youths aspiring to work in politics. The discussion rounds off with a look at the current state of Canada's healthcare system and the urgent need for reform.

00:00 Introduction to Tariffs

00:36 Guest Introduction: Daniel Dufort

00:59 Discussion on Tariffs and Economic Impact

05:54 Interprovincial Trade and Protectionism

09:58 Public Choice Theory and Rent Seeking

15:58 Housing Market Challenges and Solutions

27:57 Liberty and Leadership Program

34:16 Healthcare System Concerns

38:21 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Bob Plamondon, author and historian, takes a second look at Diefenbaker’s legacy. No question, Diefenbaker was a complex, conflicted, and often tragic man. Many have found too little to like about him and have chosen to revel in the Chief’s outrageous antics. Plamondon does not hide the antics but doesn’t dismiss worthy accomplishments either. (Watch full video on my YouTube channel)

AI summary:

In this video, Shawn interviews author, historian, and public policy expert Bob Plamondon about his latest book, 'Freedom Fighter: John Diefenbaker's Battle for Canadian Liberties and Independence.' The discussion explores Diefenbaker's complex legacy as a Canadian Prime Minister, his commitment to ordinary Canadians, and his controversial decisions. Plamondon sheds light on Diefenbaker's policies, his difficult relationship with colleagues, and his stance against American influence, offering a nuanced portrayal of a man often mischaracterized in history books.

00:00 Introduction to John Diefenbaker

01:13 Diefenbaker's Political Philosophy and Legacy

02:18 Interview with Bob Plamondon

06:39 Diefenbaker's Early Life and Legal Career

12:23 Diefenbaker's Governance and Leadership Style

17:05 Diefenbaker's Relationship with the Conservative Party

22:47 Diefenbaker's Vision for Canada

28:01 Diefenbaker's Achievements and Controversies

30:50 Diefenbaker's Legacy and Historical Evaluation

42:26 Political Hardball and Social Credit

43:24 Diefenbaker's Views on Federalism

44:12 Quebec's Status and National Programs

45:37 Diefenbaker and Pierre Trudeau

48:17 Diefenbaker's Legacy and the Avro Arrow

49:17 American Interference and the Bank of Canada

51:01 Diefenbaker's Principles and Governance

53:08 Final Thoughts and Reflections

The Liberals have convinced voters that this election is a referendum on President Trump, not Liberal leadership. The last ten years have been hard on Canadians. The Liberals are smart to maintain focus on a new threat.

Candice Malcolm mixes a blunt view of reality with a thread of hope in new media and the young people who consume it. (Click here to watch it on YouTube)

AI summary:

In this episode, Candice Malcolm, a journalist, broadcaster, bestselling author, and founder of True North News and Juno News, joins Shawn to discuss the current political climate in Canada. They delve into the impact of Justin Trudeau's governance, the potential rise of the Liberal party under Mark Carney, and the dramatic collapse of the NDP. Candace also shares insights on the role of the media, the emergence of independent content creators, and the broader implications for Canada’s future. This episode offers an in-depth exploration of the complexities shaping Canadian politics and society today.

00:00 Introduction: Trudeau's Impact on Canada

00:43 Candace Malcolm's Election Predictions

00:56 The Liberal Party's Narrative Control

01:15 Discussion on Canadian Identity

01:35 Introduction to Candace Malcolm

01:56 Week One of the Federal Election Campaign

02:10 The Shift in Canadian Politics

07:41 The Collapse of the NDP

08:06 Mark Carney's Rise and Influence

13:33 Comparing Carney and Trudeau

15:40 Canada's Lost Decade and Future Challenges

31:39 The Role of Bureaucracy in Canadian Politics

35:37 Justin Trudeau's Influence on Canadian Bureaucracy

37:01 Canada's Identity Beyond Anti-Americanism

37:39 Personal Reflections on Canadian and American Relations

39:01 The Evolution of Canadian Nationalism

40:34 Challenges in Upholding Canadian Rights and Freedoms

41:02 The Impact of Liberal Policies on Canadian Society

53:47 The Trucker Convoy: A Grassroots Movement

01:01:29 The Role of Independent Media in Canadian Politics

01:07:49 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

JJ McCullough is a young, hip, lighthearted YouTuber. His ‘cover’ grabs attention and forces you to look twice. Once hooked, JJ fascinates with clips, shots, and quips designed to keep you glued.

All dazzle and no depth, you say?

JJ’s video, Canada’s Constitution is Weird, popped up in my Google search on the Canadian constitution. Unlike America, Canada has an ‘unwritten’ constitution. The differences between written and unwritten constitutions are nuanced and lead to profound divergence when applied to lawmaking.

Nuance and profundity do not jump to mind while watching a guy with crazy hair, crazier knick-knacks, and a complete inability to sit still. If I hadn’t done a bunch of research myself, I would have dismissed JJ immediately. But he was asking the right questions, while making it look like an ad for a video game.

For a long time, I kept JJ secret. He mocks, provokes, and ridicules. He often says things I don’t support and would never say myself. But that’s the point: JJ makes you think. He throws cold water in your face with topics that would put you to sleep in other hands.

If we hope to save Canada from our current, uptight malaise, we need people like JJ. He creates and people listen. Watch and learn.

Start with these videos:

My political and philosophical beliefs explained (585k views, 13:45 minutes)

What’s good and bad about conservatism (631k views, 11:43 minutes)

AI show notes:

This episode features a riveting discussion with JJ McCullough, a professional YouTuber and journalist, delving into contemporary political philosophy and conservative principles. Topics explored include the definition of conservatism, the importance of gratitude as a political philosophy, and the challenges posed by populism and radicalization on both the left and right. JJ offers insights on current political figures such as Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre, and reflects on the complexities of a polarized political environment that demands a balance between maintaining traditional values and adapting to modern realities. Additionally, the conversation touches upon the influence of American culture on Canadian identity and the role of content creators in shaping public discourse.

00:00 Introduction: The Wicked and the Strong Government

00:34 Meet JJ McCullough: The Hip YouTuber with Profound Messages

00:57 Discussion on Gratitude and Political Philosophy

01:52 Welcome JJ McCullough: Background and Current Events

02:19 Mark Carney's Risky Snap Election

03:16 The Changing Landscape of Canadian Politics

08:32 Polling and Voter Behaviour

12:37 Trump's Influence on American Conservatism

21:02 Canadian Anti-Americanism and Cultural Identity

28:13 Defining Conservatism in Canadian Politics

37:57 Reflecting on the Status Quo

39:18 Gratitude and Defense of Values

40:34 Paradoxes of Liberal Democracy

41:50 Challenges of Conservative Governance

47:39 Mentorship and Role Modelling

50:36 The Appeal of Canadian Content 5

5:02 Thoughts on Pierre Poilievre

01:00:29 Postliberalism and Cultural Hierarchies

01:13:52 Concluding Thoughts and Future Plans

Books mentioned: The Victim Cult, 1867 Project

Dr. Milke’s think tank: The Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy

In this episode, Dr. Mark Milke discusses the importance of examining cause and effect in shaping civilization, the pitfalls of utopian thinking, and the diverse perspectives offered in his book 'The 1867 Project'. Dr. Milke, a seasoned author and researcher, also delves into the dangers of chronic victimhood as outlined in his book 'The Victim Cult'. Other topics covered include classical liberalism, conservatism, libertarianism, immigration, and the evolution of public policy in Canada. This thought-provoking discussion is a must-watch for anyone interested in political philosophy, societal reform, and contemporary issues.

00:00 Introduction: The Importance of Cause and Effect

00:22 Meet Dr. Mark Milke: Author and Think Tank Expert

00:49 The 1867 Project: Understanding Utopianism

01:08 Historical Perspectives on Imperfection

01:45 The Problem with Utopian Thinking

03:17 Debunking Myths: Ranking Ideas and Values

03:58 The Superiority of Certain Ideas

05:34 Challenges in Modern Civilization

07:34 The Importance of Honest Conversations

08:51 Indigenous Canadians: Addressing Disparities

11:56 Justin Trudeau's Post-Nationalist Comments

18:11 The Role of Classical Liberalism

27:01 Understanding Economic Outcomes Beyond Racism

28:11 Libertarianism vs. Classical Liberalism

29:38 The Power of Deep Beliefs and Reform

31:32 The Role of Ideas in Foreign Affairs

32:06 The Importance of Reality in Political Ideologies

42:25 The Victim Cult: Origins and Implications

46:08 The Necessity of Responsibility in a Rights-Based Society

49:20 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

00:00 Introduction: Rights and Politicians

00:25 Meet Brianna Morris

00:53 Defining Conservatism in Canada

02:15 Conservatism and Capitalism

04:10 Master's Thesis: Charter of Rights and Freedoms

04:41 COVID-19 and Charter Rights

07:19 Judicial vs. Parliamentary Supremacy

09:45 Practical Politics vs. Academic Discussions

10:53 Alberta Bill of Rights Movement

19:33 Canadian Identity and National Unity

23:39 Focusing on the Positive

24:14 American and Canadian Values

24:33 Conservative Campaign Strategies

25:10 The Role of Religion and Myth

28:18 Social Conservatism and Its Challenges

31:37 Libertarianism vs. Social Conservatism

35:03 The Future of Canadian Politics

43:42 Balancing Tradition and Progress

47:33 Conclusion and Final Thoughts