<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/5.5" -->
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
     xmlns:spotify="http://www.spotify.com/ns/rss"
     xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">

<channel>
    <title>The Separation of Powers</title>
    <atom:link href="https://feed.podbean.com/separationofpowers/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com</link>
    <description>Director of the Separation of Powers Institute Professor Chad Squitieri conducts interviews with legal scholars that examine the federal constitutional structure, with an emphasis on a historical understanding of the role of divided power in the preservation of “justice,” the “general welfare,” and “the blessings of liberty.”

To learn more check out www.spi.law.edu</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <generator>https://podbean.com/?v=5.5</generator>
    <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <category>Government</category>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
          <itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
<itunes:category text="Government" />
    <itunes:owner>
        <itunes:name>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:name>
            </itunes:owner>
    	<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:new-feed-url>https://feed.podbean.com/separationofpowers/feed.xml</itunes:new-feed-url>
    <itunes:image href="https://pbcdn1.podbean.com/imglogo/image-logo/20382418/SPI_LOGO_2000x2000px.jpg" />
    
    <item>
        <title>Skidmore After Loper Bright</title>
        <itunes:title>Skidmore After Loper Bright</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/skidmore-after-loper-bright/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/skidmore-after-loper-bright/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/d1492aaa-b75d-3548-bc08-c18f4517e582</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses Skidmore v. Swift &amp; Co., including its status after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, with Professor Kristin Hickman.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses <em>Skidmore v. Swift &amp; Co.</em>, including its status after <em>Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</em>, with Professor Kristin Hickman.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tafxvqryxkxpuqw7/Season_2_Episode_17qgsz.mp3" length="138357380" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses Skidmore v. Swift &amp; Co., including its status after Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, with Professor Kristin Hickman.
 
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu.
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>4322</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>2</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The President's Role in the Lawmaking Process</title>
        <itunes:title>The President's Role in the Lawmaking Process</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-presidents-role-in-the-lawmaking-process/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-presidents-role-in-the-lawmaking-process/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 09:02:03 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/68fd3edc-f879-3bec-b32c-ced91af511fe</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Professor Squitieri discusses his forthcoming article, "Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer," on the Gray Matters Podcast.  A link to the article can be found at: <a href='https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6540038'>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6540038</a></li>
<li>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a></li>
<li>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Professor Squitieri discusses his forthcoming article, "Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer," on the Gray Matters Podcast.  A link to the article can be found at: <a href='https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6540038'>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6540038</a></li>
<li>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a></li>
<li>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/q2th6avp58t5hnzp/EPISODE_13_FINAL7a70c.mp3" length="112378001" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[
Professor Squitieri discusses his forthcoming article, "Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer," on the Gray Matters Podcast.  A link to the article can be found at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6540038
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3510</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Imposing Methods of Interpretation</title>
        <itunes:title>Imposing Methods of Interpretation</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/imposing-methods-of-interpretation/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/imposing-methods-of-interpretation/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:05:47 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/0844b4db-c554-3921-992e-2df2d61840d5</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Tara Leigh Grove's new paper, which considers the Supreme Court's power to impose methods of interpretation.</p>
<p> </p>

Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>




<p class="e-10180-text encore-text-body-medium encore-internal-color-text-subdued SvUN7GwF6XYIW1FW">Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>

]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Tara Leigh Grove's new paper, which considers the Supreme Court's power to impose methods of interpretation.</p>
<p> </p>

Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>


<br>

<p class="e-10180-text encore-text-body-medium encore-internal-color-text-subdued SvUN7GwF6XYIW1FW">Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/tkq9qrfexyjawpvq/EPISODE_TWELVE6bct1.mp3" length="109050712" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Tara Leigh Grove's new paper, which considers the Supreme Court's power to impose methods of interpretation.
 

Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/



Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.

]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3406</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Habeas Corpus - California Edition</title>
        <itunes:title>Habeas Corpus - California Edition</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/habeas-corpus-california-edition/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/habeas-corpus-california-edition/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:28:03 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/f4d08132-f303-3cde-9bfc-44ddcb6f724c</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses the writ of habeas corpus with Professor William Kamin and Professor J. Joel Alicea while the three were traveling in California.
 
 

<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses the writ of habeas corpus with Professor William Kamin and Professor J. Joel Alicea while the three were traveling in California.
 
 

<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/4mjnnt6qh52vmpsn/SPI_Season_1_Episode_11_FINAL9ahgv.mp3" length="100676577" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses the writ of habeas corpus with Professor William Kamin and Professor J. Joel Alicea while the three were traveling in California.
 
 

Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3144</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Facial Challenges</title>
        <itunes:title>Facial Challenges</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/facial-challenges/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/facial-challenges/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 08:09:34 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/958a33ac-a9b7-30f4-8bb4-bd0a48c0fcb8</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Natalie Swenson's new article, "Facial Remedies and Facial Reasons."
 

<ul>
<li>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a></li>
<li>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode</li>
<li>Watch the conversation with Prof. Kevin Walsh and Justice Barrett (discussed in this episode around the 38 minute mark) here: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJUHuu2aoP4'>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJUHuu2aoP4</a></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Natalie Swenson's new article, "Facial Remedies and Facial Reasons."
 

<ul>
<li>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu</a></li>
<li>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode</li>
<li>Watch the conversation with Prof. Kevin Walsh and Justice Barrett (discussed in this episode around the 38 minute mark) here: <a href='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJUHuu2aoP4'>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJUHuu2aoP4</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/69uiibxdt7abfy4m/EPISODE_TEN_final72aby.mp3" length="109552072" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses Professor Natalie Swenson's new article, "Facial Remedies and Facial Reasons."
 


Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode
Watch the conversation with Prof. Kevin Walsh and Justice Barrett (discussed in this episode around the 38 minute mark) here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJUHuu2aoP4

]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3422</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Emergency Docket</title>
        <itunes:title>The Emergency Docket</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-emergency-docket/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-emergency-docket/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:28:56 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/12d216be-64f6-3019-abd1-f2effb32a130</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[Prof. Squitieri discusses a new paper on the emergency docket authored by lawyer Tyler Dobbs (Tyler joins this episode in his personal capacity, and not on behalf of his employer or clients).

<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[Prof. Squitieri discusses a new paper on the emergency docket authored by lawyer Tyler Dobbs (Tyler joins this episode in his personal capacity, and not on behalf of his employer or clients).

<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/qjtbf498mdhqjykz/SPI_Season_1_Episode_9742gb.mp3" length="108271447" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Prof. Squitieri discusses a new paper on the emergency docket authored by lawyer Tyler Dobbs (Tyler joins this episode in his personal capacity, and not on behalf of his employer or clients).

 
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3382</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Legislative Explanations</title>
        <itunes:title>Legislative Explanations</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/legislative-explanations/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/legislative-explanations/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 10:36:42 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/b1844a9c-0b5e-32f0-9be0-b5ea071e13fc</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses a distinction between Congress and administrative agencies with Elias Neibart, who has a draft paper on the topic.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri discusses a distinction between Congress and administrative agencies with Elias Neibart, who has a draft paper on the topic.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/v4t28xrkjvtswekb/SPI_Season_1_Episode_863j1q.mp3" length="96462012" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri discusses a distinction between Congress and administrative agencies with Elias Neibart, who has a draft paper on the topic.
 
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3013</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Law-Fact Distinction</title>
        <itunes:title>The Law-Fact Distinction</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-law-fact-distinction/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-law-fact-distinction/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:07:26 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/2bef09a8-79b6-3c53-880a-49b0198fac97</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[
<p>Professor Squitieri discusses formalist and functionalist understanding of the law-fact distinction with Notre Dame Law Professor Haley N. Proctor</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>

 ]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Professor Squitieri discusses formalist and functionalist understanding of the law-fact distinction with Notre Dame Law Professor Haley N. Proctor</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>

 ]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/hc6b59kbwyk4rv6a/SPI_Season_1_Episode_77lqjw.mp3" length="87327371" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary>Professor Squitieri discusses formalist and functionalist understanding of the law-fact distinction with Notre Dame Law Professor Haley N. Proctor

Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/

Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>2726</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The President's Tariff Authority</title>
        <itunes:title>The President's Tariff Authority</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-presidents-tariff-authority/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-presidents-tariff-authority/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:43:49 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/7a12c22f-d65d-391c-9b87-e1cc57eabb2a</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri debates the merits of upcoming tariff litigation with John J. Vecchione of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, at an event hosted by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>A note from the Georgetown Law Federalist Society: The Georgetown Law Federalist Society's Daniel Webster Debate Series covers a broad array of legal topics throughout the year to encourage nuanced civil discourse and the pursuit of truth. Named after Daniel Webster, "The Great Expounder and Defender of the Constitution," these debates bring distinguished judges, scholars, and practitioners to Georgetown Law every other Wednesday night. Each debate is live streamed by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society on its <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@GeorgetownLawFederalistSociety'>YouTube page</a>. The chapter is also active on <a href='https://www.instagram.com/gtownfedsoc/'>Instagram</a>. Inquiries about the debate series or the chapter can be directed to <a href='mailto:GULCFedSoc@gmail.com'>GULCFedSoc@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri debates the merits of upcoming tariff litigation with John J. Vecchione of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, at an event hosted by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>A note from the Georgetown Law Federalist Society: The Georgetown Law Federalist Society's Daniel Webster Debate Series covers a broad array of legal topics throughout the year to encourage nuanced civil discourse and the pursuit of truth. Named after Daniel Webster, "The Great Expounder and Defender of the Constitution," these debates bring distinguished judges, scholars, and practitioners to Georgetown Law every other Wednesday night. Each debate is live streamed by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society on its <a href='https://www.youtube.com/@GeorgetownLawFederalistSociety'>YouTube page</a>. The chapter is also active on <a href='https://www.instagram.com/gtownfedsoc/'>Instagram</a>. Inquiries about the debate series or the chapter can be directed to <a href='mailto:GULCFedSoc@gmail.com'>GULCFedSoc@gmail.com</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/958ai44mzy2ek3iq/EPISODE_SIX_FINALbjian.mp3" length="123982369" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri debates the merits of upcoming tariff litigation with John J. Vecchione of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, at an event hosted by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society.
 
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/
 
A note from the Georgetown Law Federalist Society: The Georgetown Law Federalist Society's Daniel Webster Debate Series covers a broad array of legal topics throughout the year to encourage nuanced civil discourse and the pursuit of truth. Named after Daniel Webster, "The Great Expounder and Defender of the Constitution," these debates bring distinguished judges, scholars, and practitioners to Georgetown Law every other Wednesday night. Each debate is live streamed by the Georgetown Law Federalist Society on its YouTube page. The chapter is also active on Instagram. Inquiries about the debate series or the chapter can be directed to GULCFedSoc@gmail.com
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3873</itunes:duration>
                <itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Congress and the Administrative State</title>
        <itunes:title>Congress and the Administrative State</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/congress-and-the-administrative-state/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/congress-and-the-administrative-state/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 10:32:38 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/155ccff0-40c0-3c53-8304-5086d78f18f3</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri speaks with Beau J. Baumann, a PhD candidate at Yale Law School, about a new paper and Congress's relationship to administrative agencies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Guest: </p>
<p>Beau J. Baumann, Ph.D. Candidate, Yale Law School </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri speaks with Beau J. Baumann, a PhD candidate at Yale Law School, about a new paper and Congress's relationship to administrative agencies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Guest: </p>
<p>Beau J. Baumann, Ph.D. Candidate, Yale Law School </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI: <a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/7rza9iga9mrtxmcv/SPI_Season_1_Episode_59zwkm.mp3" length="87534424" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[Professor Squitieri speaks with Beau J. Baumann, a PhD candidate at Yale Law School, about a new paper and Congress's relationship to administrative agencies.
 
Guest: 
Beau J. Baumann, Ph.D. Candidate, Yale Law School 
 
Learn more about SPI: https://spi.law.edu/
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>163920</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Administrative Remedies</title>
        <itunes:title>Administrative Remedies</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/administrative-remedies/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/administrative-remedies/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 07:20:25 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/14b86d88-889f-30f4-a49b-70b565ff9fc9</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Professor Squitieri talks with Eli Nachmany of Covington &amp; Burling LLP.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Guest: 
Eli Nachmany, Covington &amp; Burling LLP</p>
<p> </p>
Learn more about SPI:
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>
 
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Professor Squitieri talks with Eli Nachmany of Covington &amp; Burling LLP.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Guest: <br>
Eli Nachmany, Covington &amp; Burling LLP</p>
<p> </p>
Learn more about SPI:
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>
 
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/bm2yzfgyjy3terv7/SPI_Season_1_Episode_4bfak3.mp3" length="120110270" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this episode, Professor Squitieri talks with Eli Nachmany of Covington &amp; Burling LLP.
 
Guest: Eli Nachmany, Covington &amp; Burling LLP
 
Learn more about SPI:
https://spi.law.edu/
 
 
Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>3752</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>The Role of States in Administrative Law</title>
        <itunes:title>The Role of States in Administrative Law</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-role-of-states-in-administrative-law/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/the-role-of-states-in-administrative-law/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 08:19:41 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/1eead7d8-9610-325f-9675-3d72a0b625b6</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>This episode features the audio of SPI's first event of 2025, "The Role of States in Administrative Law." </p>
 
Guests:

<p>Aaron Nielson (Solicitor General, Texas)
Josh Divine (Solicitor General, Missouri)
Ben Aquiñaga (Solicitor General, Louisiana)
moderated by SPI Director Prof. Chad Squitieri

</p>
<p>Learn more about SPI:
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>


Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode features the audio of SPI's first event of 2025, "The Role of States in Administrative Law." </p>
 
Guests:

<p>Aaron Nielson (Solicitor General, Texas)<br>
Josh Divine (Solicitor General, Missouri)<br>
Ben Aquiñaga (Solicitor General, Louisiana)<br>
moderated by SPI Director Prof. Chad Squitieri<br>
<br>
</p>
<p>Learn more about SPI:<br>
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<em>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/yfjfm6z7jq23zh2i/EPISODE_THREE_FINAL9rfpo.mp3" length="106168505" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[This episode features the audio of SPI's first event of 2025, "The Role of States in Administrative Law." 
 
Guests:

Aaron Nielson (Solicitor General, Texas)Josh Divine (Solicitor General, Missouri)Ben Aquiñaga (Solicitor General, Louisiana)moderated by SPI Director Prof. Chad Squitieri
Learn more about SPI:https://spi.law.edu/Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.
]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>198797</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Humphrey’s Executor in the Lower Courts</title>
        <itunes:title>Humphrey’s Executor in the Lower Courts</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/humphrey-s-executor-in-the-lower-courts/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/humphrey-s-executor-in-the-lower-courts/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:39:12 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">separationofpowers.podbean.com/ecdfc5cc-4a41-3bfe-b6bb-3e120f1e441b</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri speaks with Evan Ezray and Jason Hilborn, two law partners at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, about their experience and the status of Humphrey’s Executor in the lower federal courts. </p>
 
Guests:

<p>Evan Ezray, Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Jason Hilborn, Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Link to brief discussed:
<a href='https://www.law.edu/_media/2025/SquitieriAmicusBriefFTCvWalmartasfiled.pdf'>https://www.law.edu/_media/2025/SquitieriAmicusBriefFTCvWalmartasfiled.pdf</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI:
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a>


Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</p>

 ]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Squitieri speaks with Evan Ezray and Jason Hilborn, two law partners at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, about their experience and the status of Humphrey’s Executor in the lower federal courts. </p>
 
Guests:

<p>Evan Ezray, Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP<br>
Jason Hilborn, Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Link to brief discussed:<br>
<a href='https://www.law.edu/_media/2025/SquitieriAmicusBriefFTCvWalmartasfiled.pdf'>https://www.law.edu/_media/2025/SquitieriAmicusBriefFTCvWalmartasfiled.pdf</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Learn more about SPI:<br>
<a href='https://spi.law.edu/'>https://spi.law.edu/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<em>Credit to C-SPAN and C-SPAN 3 for the audio clips used in the introduction of this podcast episode.</em></p>

 ]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/3qnghzsnkkv2sdgu/EPISODE_TWO_FINAL_478j949.mp3" length="53121144" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary>Professor Squitieri speaks with Evan Ezray and Jason Hillborn, two law partners at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, about their experience and the status of Humphrey’s Executor in the lower federal courts.</itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>Separation of Powers Institute</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>99376</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
    <item>
        <title>Reviewing Administrative Inaction</title>
        <itunes:title>Reviewing Administrative Inaction</itunes:title>
        <link>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/reviewing-administrative-inaction/</link>
                    <comments>https://separationofpowers.podbean.com/e/reviewing-administrative-inaction/#comments</comments>        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:52:43 -0500</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">amykap.podbean.com/e47c7dd8-a003-3726-b3b9-280a549ca7e5</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>In this inaugural episode of the Separation of Powers podcast, Professor Chad Squitieri interviews Professor Natalie Schmidt about her article "Chaney Step Zero: Judicial Review of FEC Deadlock Dismissals."</p>
]]></description>
                                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this inaugural episode of the Separation of Powers podcast, Professor Chad Squitieri interviews Professor Natalie Schmidt about her article "Chaney Step Zero: Judicial Review of FEC Deadlock Dismissals."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    
        <enclosure url="https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/hpy9cd422dq57qqn/FINAL_317_Episode_1_licensed_updated_introb09gq.mp3" length="103568118" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        <itunes:summary><![CDATA[In this inaugural episode of the Separation of Powers podcast, Professor Chad Squitieri interviews Professor Natalie Schmidt about her article "Chaney Step Zero: Judicial Review of FEC Deadlock Dismissals."]]></itunes:summary>
        <itunes:author>SPI</itunes:author>
        <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
        <itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
        <itunes:duration>193942</itunes:duration>
        <itunes:season>1</itunes:season>
        <itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
        <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
            </item>
</channel>
</rss>
