The pharmaceutical landscape for sleep medicine is undergoing unprecedented transformation. Dr. Patel surveys the emerging drug pipeline that will fundamentally change how clinicians treat obstructive sleep apnea, narcolepsy, and idiopathic hypersomnia.

For obstructive sleep apnea, Dr. Patel discusses AD-109 (atomoxetine and R-oxybutynin), explaining the mechanistic rationale and practical considerations including use with tirzepatide. The Incannex drug combining dronabinol and acetazolamide receives analysis for different patient populations, and sultiame is discussed as a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor option. A critical framework emerges: Should treatment be symptom-based or airway-focused when PAP-intolerant patients present?

Tirzepatide, the GLP-1 agonist FDA-approved for moderate-to-severe OSA, receives comprehensive coverage including muscle loss concerns, long-term use, and emerging oral GLP-1 options. Retatrutide, the triple-hormone agent combining GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon, is also discussed.

The episode's most exciting segment focuses on orexin agonists for narcolepsy. Three pharmaceutical companies—Alkemeres, Centessa (purchased by Lilly), and Takeda—are developing these mechanistically novel agents. Dr. Patel clarifies how these medications differ, discusses why one medication disrupted nocturnal sleep (suggesting continued roles for oxybates), and addresses how clinicians will choose between similar medications.

Dr. Patel emphasizes a fundamental question: Should the field prioritize symptom management versus airway patency for OSA, and mechanistic approaches versus symptom management for narcolepsy?

Whether you're interested in emerging OSA treatments, narcolepsy innovations, or the future of pharmacological sleep medicine, this live episode provides essential updates on medications that will soon reshape clinical practice.

Join us for this exciting conversation about how sleep medicine will transform in the coming years.

For years, difficult-to-treat hypertension has been recognized as an indication for sleep studies, reflecting the assumption that treating sleep apnea improves blood pressure. But does the method of PAP therapy matter? Beyond achieving a residual AHI under 5, are there treatment nuances that could optimize cardiovascular outcomes? Dr. Goyal and Dr. Agarwal's research addresses these questions, building on landmark work by Dr. Pepin examining fixed versus auto-titrating PAP therapy.

The motivation includes both clinical and economic considerations. A 2021 Portuguese study examined cost implications, and similar economic pressures exist in India where APAP is significantly more expensive than fixed CPAP. The study used a crossover design comparing fixed CPAP to APAP, measuring blood pressure dipping patterns and autonomic response to assess cardiovascular effects.

The results have prompted Dr. Goyal to reconsider his clinical practice regarding pressure selection, raising important questions: If fixed CPAP offers superior blood pressure outcomes, should the standard practice of prescribing APAP devices be reconsidered? This challenges assumptions about adaptive algorithms and raises questions about prioritizing cardiovascular outcomes beyond AHI reduction.

The episode contextualizes these findings within India's unique healthcare landscape, exploring surprising OSA incidence data and examining whether craniofacial anatomy or arousal patterns differ from Western populations. Dr. Agarwal discusses how pressures are typically determined and the practical differences between APAP 4-20 versus narrow-range settings.

Whether you're prescribing PAP therapy for hypertension, optimizing cardiovascular outcomes, or seeking evidence-based approaches to pressure selection, this episode provides important international perspectives.

Join us for this discussion that may prompt reconsideration of how we set PAP pressures and what outcomes we should prioritize.

Unlike previous guidelines, this new guidance specifically addresses what happens in real-world clinical practice: patients often request both cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and pharmacotherapy, or arrive seeking medications while clinicians advocate for behavioral interventions. The guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for navigating these combination treatment scenarios, incorporating patient preferences in ways previous guidelines did not.

The conversation explores the guideline development process, including how committee members were selected and how diverse professional backgrounds enriched the discussion. Dr. Buysse and Dr. Arnedt explain why patient preference wasn't adequately reflected in original practice guidelines and how this updated version addresses that gap.

The first recommendation receives detailed examination: In adults with chronic insomnia, the AASM suggests combination treatment with CBT-I plus medication over medication alone (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). The experts clarify which medications were examined, including whether dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) were included, and explain why evidence certainty is low despite numerous studies. Pharmaceutical sponsorship creates methodological differences—PSG outcomes, fixed time in bed requirements—that complicate interpretation. The high placebo response in insomnia trials adds another layer of complexity.

Critical implementation questions arise: What does "combination therapy" actually mean? Should both treatments start simultaneously, or should one precede the other? Can patients start medications while awaiting CBT-I appointments given typical access delays?

The second recommendation appears paradoxical: The AASM suggests against combination treatment over CBT-I alone, yet recommends combination over medication alone. Dr. Buysse and Dr. Arnedt explain this nuanced position—CBT-I alone remains superior, but for patients who prioritize rapid total sleep time improvement over daytime symptom reduction, combination therapy may be reasonable.

The conversation addresses whether treatment order matters and whether clinical (not just insurance-driven) logic suggests a medication hierarchy—zolpidem before eszopiclone, the role of trazodone, when to consider ramelteon. A crucial question emerges: What about patients who refuse or cannot access CBT-I? How do these guidelines apply when the preferred behavioral treatment is unavailable or unwanted?

Throughout, the experts emphasize that guidelines inform but don't dictate clinical decisions. Patient preferences, values, and individual circumstances must shape treatment plans. The guidelines provide evidence-based frameworks while acknowledging the complexity of real-world insomnia management.

Whether you're treating chronic insomnia, navigating patient requests for medications, addressing CBT-I access barriers, or seeking evidence-based approaches to combination therapy, this episode provides essential guidance.

Join us for this important conversation about balancing behavioral and pharmacological approaches to chronic insomnia in clinical practice.

Dr. Neilson's ambitious study analyzed records from 13 million patients within the VA system to investigate whether OSA is associated with higher risk of neurodegenerative disorders and whether treating sleep apnea might help delay the onset of dementia. The conversation traces the research design from initial hypothesis through methodology, explaining how he narrowed this massive dataset and defined both OSA diagnosis and Parkinson's disease progression.

Critical methodological details emerge: How was OSA diagnosed—through sleep testing, and using 4% or 3% hypopnea criteria? How did the study differentiate between mild and severe sleep apnea? How was Parkinson's disease identified—through clinical notes, medication records, or longitudinal follow-up? Dr. Neilson clarifies whether the analysis included only PD or extended to other neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease.

The core findings receive extensive examination: Did CPAP therapy have a modifying effect on PD risk? After adjusting for confounding factors including BMI, diabetes, depression, and hypersomnia, which variables mattered most? What was the number needed to treat to prevent one case of Parkinson's disease? Could hypoxic burden be examined as a potential mechanism?

Intriguing tangential discussions explore whether idiopathic RBD can be distinguished from trauma-related RBD and whether these represent separate pathological processes. The conversation takes an unexpected turn into the neuroprotective effects of smoking in Parkinson's disease, with Dr. Neilson explaining proposed mechanisms and drawing parallels to ischemic preconditioning that might occur with OSA.

The episode addresses severity gradients—did OSA severity correlate with PD risk? It also tackles a fundamental question: Does treating sleep apnea delay dementia onset or actually prevent it? Dr. Neilson discusses whether non-PAP therapies were examined and addresses a critical ethical concern in sleep apnea research: Is it irresponsible to withhold treatment from symptomatic patients, and did this study focus on non-sleepy individuals or include all OSA patients regardless of symptoms?

This research has profound implications for how sleep medicine practitioners frame the importance of OSA treatment with patients and families. Beyond addressing immediate symptoms like sleepiness, treating sleep apnea may reduce long-term neurodegenerative risk—a compelling motivation for adherence that extends beyond quality of life to disease prevention.

Whether you're counseling patients about the importance of OSA treatment, interested in the sleep-neurodegeneration connection, or seeking evidence-based approaches to discussing long-term benefits of therapy, this episode provides essential insights.

Join us for this important conversation about how the work sleep medicine practitioners do every day may profoundly impact patients' neurological futures.

This episode represents a departure from the typical clinical expert format. After eight seasons focusing on sleep medicine professionals, these engineer-patients reached out to share how platforms like Sleep HQ and OSCAR have transformed their understanding and management of sleep-disordered breathing. Both are power users who have helped thousands of fellow patients navigate complex PAP data, representing a patient empowerment movement that many clinicians may not fully appreciate.

David and Stuart explain what Sleep HQ and OSCAR are, how these platforms differ from standard clinical downloads, and what data visualization capabilities they offer. The platforms integrate multiple data streams—high-resolution flow rate data from PAP device SD cards, pulse oximetry from wearable rings, and sleep architecture from devices like Apple Watch—creating a comprehensive picture that goes far beyond what's typically reviewed in clinic appointments.

The conversation explores sophisticated analysis techniques these informed patients employ: identifying upper airway resistance syndrome through inspiratory flow limitation and heart rate spikes, distinguishing sleep onset versus wake onset events, detecting REM-related apneas, and recognizing positional apnea patterns. Stuart and David discuss "Somnopose," chin tuck events, and what they call "high-level waveform forensics"—detailed signal analysis that reveals subtle breathing pattern abnormalities.

A crucial discussion addresses whether these patient communities represent antagonism toward the medical establishment or an unmet need that sleep medicine should embrace. The guests emphasize their desire for collaboration, not confrontation, and offer insights into how clinicians can better partner with informed, data-driven patients who arrive with detailed self-analysis.

Whether you're encountering patients who bring detailed PAP data to appointments, curious about what these platforms reveal that standard reports don't, or seeking to better collaborate with informed patient communities, this episode provides essential perspectives from the patient side of sleep medicine.

Join us for this unique conversation that bridges the gap between clinical expertise and patient empowerment in sleep apnea management.

With the recent FDA clearance of a new hypoglossal nerve stimulator, patients now have three device options available or coming soon. Dr. Kent, whose research explores upper airway neurophysiology and novel OSA treatments, helps clinicians understand the fundamental differences between these devices and how to select the most appropriate option for individual patients. He discloses his past consulting relationship with Inspire and current consulting role with Nyxoah to provide transparent context for the discussion.

The conversation begins with the foundational premise of hypoglossal nerve stimulation and why it effectively treats obstructive sleep apnea. Dr. Kent traces Inspire's evolution since its 2013 FDA approval, explaining the current implantation process and how the technology has advanced over the past decade.

A significant focus is placed on Genio, with Dr. Kent explaining how its design resembles a cochlear implant—breaking down this comparison for pulmonologists and other non-surgical specialists. Critical distinctions emerge: Genio uses bilateral stimulation versus Inspire's unilateral approach, lacks a respiratory sensor, and employs an external rechargeable battery. Dr. Kent clarifies the practical implications of these differences, including how pulse delivery is timed without respiratory synchronization, what external battery charging means for daily use, smartphone Bluetooth connectivity, and MRI compatibility considerations.

The episode tackles important clinical questions: Is bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation superior to unilateral stimulation? Does complete concentric collapse (CCC) matter as a contraindication, and if conflicting data exists about CCC exclusion criteria, how should this inform patient selection? Is drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) necessary for all candidates? Dr. Kent discusses how the STAR trial differed from the DREAM trial and how pandemic timing affected patient outcomes and data interpretation.

Looking toward the future, Dr. Kent provides insights into Aura6000, expected to be available in 2027, and discusses his research on ansa cervicalis stimulation as a potential complementary approach, acknowledging that hypoglossal nerve stimulation alone may not be the complete solution for all patients.

A particularly valuable discussion addresses setting realistic patient expectations. Dr. Kent shares his experience with patients who arrive with preconceived notions about Inspire based on marketing or word-of-mouth, requiring significant time to align expectations with reality. He walks through his clinical conversations comparing Inspire versus Genio, helping clinicians develop frameworks for these nuanced discussions.

Whether you're counseling patients about device-based OSA treatment options, trying to distinguish between available technologies, or preparing for the expanding landscape of hypoglossal nerve stimulation, this episode provides essential comparative insights.

Join us for this comprehensive discussion about the past, present, and future of implantable OSA therapy.

The conversation is framed by alarming findings from recent high‑profile studies showing microplastics in carotid artery plaque and even in the olfactory bulb of the human brain — discoveries that raise important questions about how these particles enter the body and their potential long‑term health effects. Dr. Mauad discusses her work on microplastics in neural tissue and explains how these particles may interact with inflammatory pathways, while Dr. Cahali describes their collaborative research evaluating microplastic deposition in the nasal airway.

A key focus of the discussion is whether PAP therapy itself contributes to microplastic exposure. The guests walk through their study design, control population, and findings, including the reassuring conclusion that PAP users did not demonstrate higher levels of microplastics in the nasal airway compared with controls. They also address important nuances, such as equipment age, material degradation, and how exposure may differ throughout the respiratory tract.

Beyond PAP therapy, the episode expands into a broader conversation about how plastics are manufactured, the role of additives and so‑called “forever chemicals,” and how responsibility for reducing plastic exposure has historically shifted to consumers rather than manufacturers. Drs. Mauad and Cahali reflect on what these findings mean for sleep medicine professionals and discuss practical steps the sleep community can take — from clinical practice to advocacy — to reduce plastic exposure in health care settings.

Whether you’re concerned about the safety of PAP devices, interested in emerging research on microplastics and inflammation, or looking to better understand how environmental exposures intersect with sleep health, this episode provides important scientific context and thoughtful perspective on an issue that extends far beyond the sleep clinic.

The guidelines address a significant gap in inpatient care: how to systematically screen for sleep apnea in hospitalized patients, prioritize high-risk groups, determine when and where to perform testing, and ensure appropriate outpatient follow-up. Dr. Mehra and Dr. Auckley explain the impetus behind developing these guidelines and the PICO question process used to examine existing evidence, acknowledging the challenges of working with limited data in this emerging field.

The conversation systematically walks through the four key recommendations: in-hospital screening for OSA as part of an evaluation and management pathway, use of inpatient PAP treatment for newly diagnosed or untreated moderate-to-severe OSA, availability of sleep medicine consultation, and implementation of discharge management plans to ensure timely diagnosis and effective outpatient management.

Practical implementation receives extensive attention. How should patients be screened—using STOP-Bang or facility-specific methods? Should screening be built into the EMR? Which patient populations and hospital units should be prioritized? Who performs the screening—sleep navigators, nursing staff, or hospitalists? Can sleep consultations be conducted via telemedicine at the bedside? The experts emphasize the critical need for a program champion and comprehensive education initiatives.

Dr. Auckley shares invaluable lessons from his experience creating an inpatient sleep program, discussing what he wishes he'd known before starting and practical insights gained through implementation. A particularly frustrating issue receives attention: patients who bring their own PAP devices to the hospital but never have them set up or used during their stay. The guidelines address this common scenario and provide frameworks for ensuring treated patients continue therapy during hospitalization.

Legal liability considerations are explored: What responsibilities exist for untreated patients diagnosed with OSA during hospitalization? What about high-risk patients who haven't been formally diagnosed? The experts discuss strategies for ensuring outpatient follow-up, recognizing that effective discharge planning is essential for translating inpatient identification into long-term management.

Whether you're considering establishing an inpatient sleep program, frustrated by gaps in hospital-based sleep apnea care, or seeking evidence-based approaches to identifying and managing OSA in hospitalized patients, this episode provides essential guidance and practical implementation strategies.

Join us for this important discussion about bringing systematic sleep apnea evaluation and management into the inpatient setting.

Living and practicing sleep medicine in Colorado has given Dr. McCarty extensive experience managing altitude-related central sleep apnea, a condition that affects many residents and visitors to elevated regions. The conversation begins with fundamental questions: Is central sleep apnea normal at altitude? What physiological mechanisms drive its development? Dr. McCarty explains the prevalence patterns across different elevations, from Denver's mile-high altitude to extreme elevations like 10,000 feet, and whether there's a threshold where everyone develops central events.

Practical diagnostic considerations receive detailed attention: Should patients be tested at their home altitude? How are titration studies conducted in high-altitude settings? What testing equipment best identifies central apneas, and should central hypopneas be scored? Dr. McCarty discusses the high prevalence of treatment-emergent central sleep apnea (TECSA) at altitude and how many patients present with mixed obstructive and central patterns, complicating treatment decisions.

The episode provides essential guidance for clinicians whose patients travel to high altitude destinations. What PAP adjustments should be made? How should EPR (expiratory pressure relief) settings be modified? Dr. McCarty walks through his decision-making framework for when to treat altitude-related central apnea, emphasizing the importance of patient education before ascension.

Treatment options are systematically reviewed: pressure adjustments, the role of BPAP therapy, when to consider ASV, acetazolamide use, and supplemental oxygen. Dr. McCarty discusses whether pre-emptive treatment is appropriate for patients planning high-altitude travel and provides practical protocols for managing both residents who live at altitude and visitors experiencing acute exposure.

The conversation emphasizes patient-centered approaches, considering not just the physiological aspects of altitude-related breathing disturbances but also the practical realities of treating patients in mountain communities and preparing lowland residents for high-altitude adventures.

Whether you practice in elevated regions, have patients who travel to altitude destinations, or simply want to understand the physiology behind altitude-related central sleep apnea, this episode provides essential clinical guidance.

Join us for this informative discussion about a condition that affects millions living at or traveling to high elevations.

As new therapeutic options emerge and our understanding of comorbid insomnia and sleep apnea (COMISA) evolves, clinicians are increasingly confronted with nuanced decisions about when—and whether—to use hypnotic medications. The guests unpack the latest evidence and share insights from recent studies, including research evaluating dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) such as lemborexant in individuals with sleep apnea.

The conversation begins with a review of hypnotic medication classes and explores which agents may be safer in untreated OSA, and which still raise concerns. The panel discusses a recent lemborexant study, its design, population characteristics (including BMI and OSA severity considerations), and whether industry sponsorship played a role. They clarify that while the study did not focus specifically on COMISA, it sheds light on how DORAs perform in people with sleep apnea—particularly in terms of respiratory metrics.

The experts tackle the practical clinical dilemma of treatment sequencing in COMISA: Should clinicians begin with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT‑I), initiate PAP therapy, or consider medications first? They walk through what is known about how different hypnotic classes—including z‑drugs, GABAergic agents, trazodone, and DORAs—affect respiratory drive and sleep architecture. The discussion extends to special circumstances such as REM‑related OSA, where increased REM sleep induced by certain medications may have unique implications.

The episode also considers broader emerging questions: Do DORAs improve apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) even without PAP? Can hypnotics be used strategically to improve sleep continuity without worsening respiratory parameters? And will future insomnia care rely on identifying phenotypes that respond differently to GABA‑based medications or wakefulness‑impairment targets?

Throughout the conversation, the guests emphasize evidence-based takeaways, including the central finding that DORAs do not appear to worsen OSA‑related metrics, offering reassurance for clinicians who might consider using a hypnotic in a patien with untreated OSA. .

Whether you regularly see patients with comorbid insomnia and untreated sleep apnea or simply want clarity on the evolving role of hypnotics in this population, this episode offers practical, research-grounded guidance for clinical decision making.

Join us for this important discussion on how hypnotics can be used safely and thoughtfully in patients with untreated OSA.

Consumer wearables have become ubiquitous in clinical practice, with patients routinely sharing device data. While some clinicians have historically dismissed this information, attitudes are shifting as technology improves and rigorous research examines sensors, algorithms, and data quality. Dr. Chee explains that the recommendations are designed for multiple audiences: end-users, clinicians, researchers, and manufacturers, with specific guidance for each group.

The conversation addresses practical considerations: the assumption that users have good perfusion, how bed partners can influence movement detection, and the fundamental truth that the best device is one patients will actually wear properly. The panel discusses recent FDA regulatory changes and clarifies whether guidance applies only to non-FDA cleared wellness devices or has broader implications.

The experts systematically review various metrics from wearables. They introduce TATS (total attempted time in sleep) and explain what clinicians should know about sleep onset and offset detection.

The episode emphasizes the call for standardized Fundamental Sleep Measures and greater transparency about test populations used in device validation. Dr. Baumert discusses the need to co-create benchmarks for measurement accuracy across different contexts—from persons with normal sleep to shift workers to those with sleep disorders.

Whether you're skeptical about consumer wearables or seeking guidance on interpreting patient-generated data, this episode provides evidence-based recommendations for moving forward responsibly.

Join us for this important discussion about embracing consumer sleep technology while maintaining clinical rigor.

The conversation begins with the rigorous process behind guideline development, clarifying the distinction between evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion. The panel systematically walks through each recommendation, addressing CPAP use across various CSA etiologies including primary CSA, heart failure-related CSA, medication-induced CSA, treatment-emergent CSA, and CSA due to medical conditions.

A surprising recommendation against BPAP without backup rate generates discussion about why backup rates matter and why heart failure patients are excluded from certain BPAP recommendations. The experts tackle the controversial topic of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV), explaining why it's now conditionally recommended even for heart failure patients despite SERVE-HF trial concerns. They clarify that newer ASV algorithms differ from devices used in that study and emphasize the importance of patient-provider shared decision-making and treatment at experienced centers.

Practical implementation guidance covers oxygen therapy for heart failure and high-altitude CSA, including insurance coverage challenges. The panel discusses acetazolamide use across multiple CSA etiologies, providing concrete advice on prescribing and follow-up protocols. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation receives attention as an option for select patients, with candid discussion about its invasive nature, accessibility limitations, and high costs.

The episode addresses the shift toward viewing CSA treatment as chronic disease management, including billing code G211 implications. The experts emphasize that guidelines guide but don't constrain clinical judgment, stressing the importance of monitoring beyond AHI—including patient symptoms and quality of life improvements.

Whether you're treating patients with CSA, navigating insurance coverage, or seeking clarity on when ASV is appropriate, this review provides essential guidance for implementing evidence-based CSA treatment.

Join us for this season premiere that translates complex guidelines into practical clinical applications.

Dr. Badr discusses his vision for the journal and the editorial selection process, then guides listeners through key research findings shaping clinical practice. The conversation highlights both highly popular papers and important studies that deserve more attention from practicing clinicians. 

A significant focus is placed on research confirming that traditional 4% hypopnea criteria and CMS definitions systematically underestimate sleep apnea in women, with expanded diagnostic criteria helping mitigate these gender disparities. The episode explores groundbreaking research on sleep architecture and Alzheimer's disease, examining how lower slow wave sleep and REM sleep correlate with brain atrophy in AD-vulnerable regions, particularly the inferior parietal lobe. 

Consumer sleep technology receives critical examination through a meta-analysis comparing wrist-worn devices to polysomnography, revealing significant limitations in accuracy. Dr. Badr discusses implications for physicians and consumers who increasingly rely on these devices. Mental health intersects with sleep medicine through research showing that nightmares and insomnia in the acute aftermath of trauma predict suicidal ideation—nearly half of acute trauma patients with both conditions experience suicidal ideation within two months, highlighting urgent need for early interventions. 

Additional topics include Canadian research on CBT-I effectiveness during pregnancy and findings from the TODAY study examining obstructive sleep apnea's relationship with glycemic control and cardiovascular risk in young adults with youth-onset type 2 diabetes.

Whether you're looking to stay current with evidence-based practice changes, interested in emerging research on sleep and neurodegeneration, or seeking to understand gender disparities in sleep medicine, this year-in-review provides essential updates. 

Dr. McKeown, a neurologist, introduces his FDA-cleared non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia using vestibular nerve stimulation. He explains how the technology works, why stimulating nerves in this manner is safe, and how it differs from vagus nerve devices. The conversation explores the relationship with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), addresses the placebo effect question, and clarifies whether this is a long-term solution or temporary intervention. Dr. McKeown discusses contraindications including pregnancy and Inspire therapy, potential side effects, and ideal patient populations.

Dr. Kilic presents his sensor technology that enables non-invasive assessment of airway collapse location and severity—what he calls an "anatomic PSG." This innovation addresses a critical challenge: predicting which patients will respond to specific treatments like oral appliances, Inspire, or PAP therapy based on individual anatomical collapse patterns. Using a cheek-mounted sensor, the device identifies obstruction levels, differentiates between primary and secondary collapse sites, and detects collapse at the velopharyngeal level.

The discussion explores whether this represents a scalable alternative to drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE), how it integrates with OSA endotyping, and practical applications during titration studies to identify optimal pressure ranges and guide combination therapies. Both innovators emphasize moving beyond one-size-fits-all approaches toward personalized, anatomy-based treatment selection.

Whether you're interested in non-pharmacological insomnia treatments, precision medicine approaches to OSA, or the future of sleep diagnostics, this episode showcases innovative thinking driving the next generation of sleep medicine.

Join us for this exciting live conversation from Sleep Medicine Disruptors.

Craniofacial sleep medicine represents a paradigm shift from license-based treatment allocation to collaborative, anatomy-driven care where dentists, surgeons, and sleep physicians work together to determine the most appropriate interventions based on individual structural characteristics. Dr. Singh explains why understanding craniofacial structures is crucial for personalizing OSA treatment, including why Asian populations show high OSA prevalence despite lower obesity rates.

The conversation provides a comprehensive crash course in assessing craniofacial anatomy: What is retrognathia and what causes it? How can clinicians alter jaw position by adjusting cranial base morphology? Dr. Singh explains the classification system for dental occlusion (Class I, II, and III bites), midface assessment techniques, and the palate evaluation method Dr. Guilleminault taught fellows. He discusses critical anatomical considerations including tongue positioning at rest and during sleep, lateral pharyngeal wall collapse, and cervical vertebrae influence on airway patency.

The episode explores both preventive approaches in children and interventions for adults, addressing whether craniofacial modifications require surgery or can be achieved through other means. Dr. Singh discusses palatal expansion, tongue traction techniques, and the physiological components that remain addressable even after skeletal maturity. He also explains age-related changes including loss of muscle tone, bone volume reduction, and maxillary drift that progressively narrow the airway.

Intriguing topics include the mechanisms behind why didgeridoo playing and conch shell blowing improve sleep apnea, the role of oromyofunctional therapy as a viable treatment option, evolutionary changes in human dentition that impact airway anatomy, and even the dental stem cell implications for regenerative approaches. Dr. Singh also clarifies surprising facts, such as why mouthguards in contact sports serve purposes beyond tooth protection.

Whether you're seeking to understand anatomical contributors to OSA beyond obesity, interested in multidisciplinary treatment approaches, or curious about how craniofacial structure influences treatment selection, this episode provides essential insights into personalized, anatomy-based sleep apnea management.

Join us for this fascinating exploration of how form determines function in the upper airway and how understanding craniofacial anatomy can revolutionize OSA treatment strategies. 

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare, from AI-assisted sleep study scoring to clinical documentation tools and insurance claim processing. Yet AI is not a monolith—the technology encompasses various types with different capabilities, risks, and regulatory considerations. Matt Anastasi breaks down the different forms of AI clinicians encounter in practice, while the panel explains what "responsible use" actually means in practical terms.

The updated position statement, notably shorter and more accessible than previous versions, addresses four major pillars: data privacy, fairness and transparency, infrastructure requirements, and medical-legal considerations. The discussion explores critical questions facing sleep medicine practitioners: How do we understand and trust the AI systems we use? What happens when insurance payors deploy AI to deny claims—should we fight AI-generated denials with AI-generated appeals? Do patients need to be informed when AI is used in their care, and how specific must those disclosures be?

The conversation delves into liability concerns that keep practitioners awake at night: If your employer implements AI and it makes an error, who bears responsibility? What about ignoring AI prompts—does that create liability? Dr. Sachdeva explains the concept of vicarious responsibility and how it applies to AI implementation.

Practical implementation guidance is provided through discussion of governance checklists, equity considerations in AI deployment, and the limitations of FDA clearance for AI-assisted sleep study scoring. The experts introduce AASM Link and discuss how practitioners can evaluate AI tools beyond marketing claims, ensuring systems are trained on diverse, representative data sets.

The episode tackles a fundamental question: Is AI use inevitable in sleep medicine, or can practitioners opt out? The panel offers realistic perspectives on integrating AI responsibly while maintaining clinical judgment and patient-centered care.

Whether you're already using AI tools, considering implementation, or resistant to adoption, this episode provides essential guidance on navigating the AI transformation in sleep medicine while upholding professional and ethical standards.

Join us for this timely discussion about balancing innovation with responsibility in the AI era of sleep medicine.

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale has been a cornerstone of sleep medicine practice for decades, yet clinicians universally acknowledge its limitations in capturing the full patient experience. Similarly, PAP adherence—while important and part of Medicare's MIPS program—tells only part of the story about treatment success. During his AASM presidency, Dr. Kirsch recognized the need for a more comprehensive metric and convened an expert advisory panel to develop a better solution.

The conversation traces PLATO's development journey, which Dr. Rosen described as "Doug's baby with a prolonged gestation." Starting with 44 potential questions and utilizing the ICON methodology, the panel carefully refined the tool to capture domains beyond simple sleepiness—including quality of life, functional impairment, and symptom burden that the Epworth overlooks. Dr. Kirsch and Dr. Abbasi-Feinberg explain the validation process, how the tool discriminates between OSA severity levels, and why certain seemingly similar questions about sleepiness were all retained.

The episode addresses practical implementation questions: How is PLATO scored? Why do the first two sections use 5-point scales while the final section uses 10 points? Is it free to use, and how does one access it? Will it integrate into electronic health record systems like Epic? Most importantly, how should clinicians use this tool—will it replace the Epworth for Medicare requirements, or does it serve a different purpose?

The discussion also explores how PLATO relates to the recent AHRQ report on OSA treatment outcomes and why the tool focuses on patient-reported symptoms rather than solely cardiovascular endpoints. Dr. Kirsch shares his vision for PLATO's future, including hopes for foundation grants to further study the tool and demonstrate that treating OSA and its associated sleepiness meaningfully improves patient outcomes.

Whether you're frustrated with current assessment limitations, interested in value-based care metrics, or seeking better ways to document treatment efficacy beyond adherence data, this episode provides essential insights into a tool that may reshape how we measure success in sleep medicine.

Join us for this important discussion about moving beyond PAP adherence and Epworth scores to truly capture what matters to our patients.

Steve Van Hout explains what makes the Disruptors conference unique compared to other AASM meetings like Trends and the annual SLEEP conference. Designed to bring together clinicians, researchers, technology innovators,and venture capitalists, Disruptors aims to foster cross-industry collaboration and encourage investment in sleep medicine innovations. The conference features innovation award presentations similar to Shark Tank pitches with the audience voting on their favorites, keynote speakers, and discussions about emerging technologies that promise to transform how we diagnose and treat sleep disorders.

Dr. White provides an in-depth preview of his presentation on pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea, sharing exciting developments in multiple drug candidates. He discusses Apnimed’s AD-109, a combination of atomoxetine and R-oxybutynin, which has completed two phase three studies showing approximately 50% reduction in AHI across six-month and one-year trials involving over 650 patients each. With FDA submission planned for early 2026, this medication could reach the market by late 2026.

The conversation explores other promising agents including Incannex's combination of dronabinol and acetazolamide, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors like sulthiame (recently licensed by Apnimed), and innovative potassium channelantagonists that could be delivered via nasal spray for localized upper airway effects with minimal systemic absorption. Dr. White discusses the potential for poly therapy approaches, combining medications with devices like mandibular advancement devices or positional therapy, drawing parallels to how hypertension and diabetes are managed with multiple treatments.

The episode tackles important questions about the future of sleep medicine: Will pharmacotherapy replace PAP therapy, or will hybrid approaches become standard? What AHI reduction is clinically meaningful for cardiovascularprotection and symptom improvement? How will pricing and insurance coverage affect accessibility? They emphasize that while these medications may not replace CPAP entirely, they offer promising options for patients who struggle with existing therapies.

Whether you're a sleep medicine practitioner interested in emerging treatments, an entrepreneur exploring innovation opportunities, or simply curious about the future of sleep disorder management, this episode provides essential insights into the rapidly evolving landscape of sleep medicine.

Join us for this forward-looking conversation about innovation, investment, and the technologies poised to disrupt traditional sleep medicine practice.

Ever wondered how clinical practice guidelines are developed and why updates take so long? Dr. Shelgikar pulls back the curtain on the comprehensive process behind guideline creation, from topic selection to evidence review to final publication. She explains how the AASM prioritizes which guidelines need updating and how members can influence these decisions. 

The conversation addresses pressing concerns facing sleep medicine practitioners: the ongoing review of home sleep apnea testing codes, declining reimbursement rates, and the financial viability of sleep medicine practices. Dr. Shelgikar discusses the AASM's advocacy efforts, recent legislative wins and setbacks, and strategies for improving the value proposition of polysomnography in an evolving healthcare landscape. 

 Looking toward the future, the discussion explores emerging trends including the potential for inpatient sleep medicine services, the shift toward chronic disease management models, and new technologies like acoustic stimulation. Dr. Shelgikar shares insights on how the field might evolve beyond its traditional testing-focused approach and adapt to changing reimbursement structures. 

The episode also demystifies AASM governance: How are committees formed and sunset? Why can't every volunteer serve? What happens during board meetings? Is board membership reserved for academics? Dr. Shelgikar provides practical guidance on how members can engage more meaningfully with the organization and influence its direction. 

 Whether you're a longtime AASM member curious about organizational decision-making or a newer member seeking to understand how to get involved, this episode offers valuable transparency into the processes that shape sleep medicine policy and practice. 

Join us for this informative conversation that bridges organizational leadership with frontline clinical concerns in sleep medicine. 

Drawing from recent research published in Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Dr. Ali explains how sleep serves as a critical regulator of skin physiology, affecting everything from skin surface pH and transepidermal water loss to blood flow and temperature regulation. The conversation delves into the complex interplay of circadian rhythms, hormones, and inflammatory cytokines that govern both sleep patterns and skin homeostasis.

The discussion covers how sleep deprivation accelerates skin aging as an extrinsic factor alongside sun exposure and pollution, with compelling evidence from studies showing that good sleepers have significantly better skin aging scores and improved recovery from UV exposure. Dr. Ali explores the bidirectional nature of this relationship—while poor sleep worsens skin conditions, dermatological disorders like atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and rosacea can severely disrupt sleep through mechanisms including the itch-scratch cycle and inflammatory processes.

The episode addresses practical clinical concerns including the higher prevalence of sleep disorders in patients with conditions like hidradenitis suppurativa and rosacea, the role of obstructive sleep apnea in various skin conditions, and evidence-based approaches to breaking the itch-scratch cycle that disrupts sleep in dermatological patients.

The conversation also tackles common sleep treatment-related skin issues, from CPAP mask irritation and "maskne" to headgear-induced hair loss, providing practical guidance for managing these complications. Dr. Ali discusses proper skincare routines for CPAP users, including the safety of retinol use under masks and strategies for preventing pressure-related skin breakdown.

Whether you're a sleep medicine practitioner encountering dermatological complaints, a dermatologist treating patients with sleep disruption, or simply interested in optimizing both sleep and skin health, this episode provides evidence-based insights into this often-overlooked connection.

Join us for this comprehensive discussion that bridges dermatology and sleep medicine to enhance patient care and understanding.

The conversation explores how military and first responder training fundamentally changes individuals, creating an "adrenaline-focused" mindset that profoundly impacts their relationship with sleep and health. Dr. Burek provides insider insights into the stages of military service and the concept of "sacrifice" as a unifying characteristic among veterans, while explaining why many veterans may minimize or dismiss their service experiences.

The guests introduce the BRAVE program, an innovative initiative designed specifically for military veterans and first responders to address the "invisible wounds of service"—PTSD and TBI—and their complex interactions with sleep disorders. Unlike traditional VA programs, BRAVE takes a specialized approach to understanding how military culture and experiences create unique sleep medicine challenges.

The discussion covers critical clinical topics including insomnia management in veterans, the frequent use of clonidine as a treatment option, REM behavior disorder presentations that may differ from civilian populations, and the intricate relationships between PTSD, TBI, sleep-disordered breathing, and nightmare disorders. The experts address whether these sleep disturbances stem from combat trauma, brain injury, or the military experience itself.

This episode provides essential insights for healthcare providers treating veterans, including practical approaches to asking about TBI history, understanding military culture's impact on patient care, and recognizing when specialized referrals may be beneficial.

Whether you're a sleep medicine practitioner, mental health professional, or healthcare provider serving veteran populations, this episode offers valuable perspectives on culturally competent care for those who have served.

Join us for this enlightening discussion that bridges military culture and sleep medicine to improve care for our veterans and first responders.

Following the recent updates to RLS guidelines, this conversation addresses the often-overlooked condition of periodic limb movement disorder (PLMD). The guests reveal surprising findings that challenge traditional teaching: while sleep medicine practitioners have long been taught that PLMD improves with PAP therapy, their research shows that 30% of patients continue to experience significant periodic limb movements even after successful OSA treatment.

The discussion explores critical clinical questions: Are PLMs innocent bystanders or pathological processes requiring treatment? When do PLMs become PLMD? How should we evaluate residual hypersomnolence in well-treated OSA patients—should we screen for persistent PLMs before prescribing wake-promoting agents? The experts also delve into the complex relationship between RLS and PLMs, examining whether they represent interconnected sensory and motor phenomena or distinct processes.

Practical treatment strategies are covered extensively, including the role of iron supplementation, appropriate diagnostic testing, IV iron protocols, and evidence-based pharmacological interventions. The conversation also addresses how the shift toward home sleep testing may impact our ability to detect and treat this important cause of continued sleep disruption.

Whether you're treating OSA patients with persistent daytime sleepiness or managing complex sleep disorders, this episode provides essential insights into recognizing and treating PLMD as a potential contributor to ongoing symptoms.

Join us for this clinically relevant discussion that may change how you approach residual hypersomnolence in your practice. 

Building on the AASM's updated RBD guidelines, Dr. Baldelli presents compelling evidence for using simple autonomic reflex testing to identify patients at highest risk for phenoconversion to conditions like Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. His research demonstrates that objective autonomic testing, particularly orthostatic assessments, can reveal early neurogenic orthostatic hypotension that precedes overt neurodegeneration by years.

The conversation explores practical clinical applications: How can sleep medicine practitioners implement these screening protocols? What constitutes abnormal autonomic function in RBD patients? How do we interpret changes over time, and when should patients be referred for neurological evaluation? Dr. Baldelli shares his longitudinal monitoring framework that could transform how we counsel RBD patients about their future risk.

This episode addresses critical questions about biomarker development in prodromal neurodegeneration, the timeline of autonomic changes, and evidence-based approaches to patient discussions about prognosis. Dr. Baldelli also discusses current research initiatives and potential therapeutic interventions for high-risk patients.

Whether you're a sleep medicine physician, neurologist, or researcher interested in neurodegenerative diseases, this episode provides essential insights into improving early detection and patient care in RBD.

Join us for this informative discussion that bridges sleep medicine and neurology to enhance clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Building on Dr. Maiken Nedergard's award-winning work on the glymphatic system, Dr. Hauglund's latest study published in Nature reveals surprising findings about how sleep medications may interfere with the brain's ability to clear waste products. Through innovative mouse studies using advanced imaging techniques, her research demonstrates that zolpidem reduces glymphatic clearance by 30%, raising important questions about long-term cognitive health. 

The conversation explores fascinating discoveries about micro arousals during sleep—are these brief awakenings actually beneficial for brain clearance rather than disruptive? Dr. Hauglund explains the delicate balance between sleep quality and the brain's cleaning mechanisms, and how different neurotransmitters orchestrate these crucial overnight processes. 

This episode addresses critical clinical questions: Should we reconsider our prescribing practices for sleep medications? How do we weigh the benefits of medicated sleep against potential impacts on brain health? What are the implications for patients using zolpidem long-term, particularly regarding neurodegenerative disease risk? 

Whether you're a sleep medicine practitioner, researcher, or interested in understanding how sleep affects brain health, this episode provides essential insights into the complex relationship between sleep medications and neurological well-being. 

Join us for this thought-provoking discussion that may reshape how we think about treating insomnia and protecting long-term brain health. 

Dr. Michelle Cantwell received her DMD through the University of Pittsburgh's School of Dental Medicine, where she also completed a three-year residency in prosthodontics. Following dental school, she served as a lieutenant commander in the US Navy. She is a diplomate of the ABDSM and the president-elect of the AADSM. She works in the pulmonary and sleep medicine department of WellSpan Health.

Aaron Glick, DDS, FAGD, FICOI, D.ABDSM, is a dentist who has committed his practice to dental sleep medicine. He has been recognized as a “Top 10 Dentist to Watch” and works clinically utilizing teledentistry for efficient patient care. Dr. Glick educates fellow practitioners as the Mastery Program Director at the American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine, focusing on mandibular advancement devices. Additionally, he is on the faculty at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry. He actively lectures nationally and publishes on obstructive sleep apnea and technology. He enjoys all technologies and has a medical device and software programming background

While ADHD diagnostic criteria don't currently include sleep assessment, Dr. Saletin's groundbreaking research reveals how sleep quality and timing may significantly impact attention, particularly in children. Through fMRI studies and clinical observations, he explores whether sleep loss exacerbates ADHD symptoms or might even present as ADHD-like behavior in some cases. 

The conversation delves into fascinating questions: Are people with ADHD more sensitive to sleep deprivation? Can improving sleep habits reduce ADHD symptoms? How do common sleep disorders like obstructive sleep apnea intersect with attention disorders? Dr. Saletin shares practical strategies for protecting sleep in children with attention challenges, including potential educational accommodations. 

Whether you're a healthcare provider, parent, educator, or simply interested in understanding the sleep-attention connection, this episode offers valuable insights into how addressing sleep might be a crucial component in managing ADHD effectively. 

Join us for this enlightening discussion as we explore how sleep might be a modifiable risk factor in ADHD, providing new hope for better management strategies. 

The conversation examines how to recognize true burnout versus temporary fatigue and challenges the common rhetoric about "resilience" that shifts responsibility from broken systems to individuals. Dr. Ramnath shares his personal burnout experience and discusses whether dramatic career changes are necessary before making meaningful improvements to professional satisfaction. 

Discover actionable steps for reducing burnout, including negotiating with leadership, establishing horizontal professional networks, and eliminating low-value work. Learn how coding efficiency relates to burnout and understand the emerging role of "health architects" in creating sustainable medical workplaces. 

The discussion also addresses Dr. Ramnath's public response to demands for federal employee productivity reporting, techniques for constructive workplace conversations, and practical advice for saying "no" effectively—a crucial skill rarely taught in medical training. Whether considering a job change or trying to improve a current position, this episode provides essential guidance for creating a more sustainable medical career. 

Discover Dr. Khan's assessment strategies for insomnia in women, including decision-making frameworks for implementing CBT-I versus medication interventions. Learn about the underdiagnosis of sleep disorders in women, particularly during menopause, and strategies for changing this normalized narrative. The conversation explores the physiological differences in sleep-disordered breathing between men and women, explaining why sleep apnea incidence equalizes during menopause. 

The discussion addresses managing hypersomnia during pregnancy, approaches to fatigue without diagnosed sleep disorders, connections between PCOS and sleep disruption, and guidance on Restless Legs Syndrome management, including the critical role of iron deficiency screening in adolescent girls. 

This episode provides essential knowledge for practitioners seeking to better understand and treat the unique sleep health challenges women face across their lifespans. 

Discover key insights about the SURMOUNT-OSA trial results published in the New England Journal of Medicine, including the mechanisms behind AHI improvement beyond weight reduction alone. Learn practical implementation strategies for private practices, including documentation requirements for insurance approval, necessary baseline labs, and optimal patient follow-up protocols. The experts address crucial questions about Medicare coverage, long-term medication management, the need for retesting at goal weight, and considerations for transitioning patients already using GLP-1 medications like Ozempic or Wegovy. 

This episode provides essential guidance for sleep medicine specialists considering expanding their treatment options beyond traditional PAP therapy, including collaborations with obesity medicine clinics and whether obtaining board certification in Obesity Medicine would benefit sleep clinicians. This timely discussion equips practitioners with the knowledge to navigate the intersection of sleep medicine and obesity treatment in managing OSA patients 

Discover groundbreaking findings on how PAP settings may influence inflammatory biomarkers like angiopoietin-2 (AP2) and VEGF-A, potentially explaining why cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials haven't consistently shown improvement with PAP therapy. Learn about pressure optimization strategies, alternatives to high-pressure PAP therapy, and implications for treating 

Discover insights into clinical endpoints for evaluating OSA treatment, the complex relationship between upper airway collapsibility and anxiety, and innovative strategies for patients with challenging sleep disorders. Dr. Krakow shares his unique perspectives on PAP therapy, including approaches for patients with PTSD and the potential role of behavioral interventions. 

Discover the science behind KPAP, its potential advantages over traditional CPAP, and how it addresses issues like treatment-emergent central apneas and CO2 rebreathing. The discussion covers the device's development, clinical trial results, and implications for sleep apnea treatment, offering insights for clinicians and patients alike.

Discover how this algorithm uses accelerometry and breathing disturbance detection to screen for potential sleep apnea, its limitations, and implications for patient care. The conversation delves into the algorithm's performance, its role in consumer health technology, and guidance for sleep medicine professionals navigating new diagnostic tools. Whether you're a clinician or interested in sleep health technology, this episode offers critical insights into the future of sleep disorder screening. 

The discussion covers device-specific algorithms, historical development of AHI measurement, and the role of patient monitoring software like OSCAR and SleepHQ. Learn about therapeutic approaches for unstable breathing, including medication options and practical management strategies for complex sleep apnea cases.

Discover the latest insights into how sleep impacts trauma response, including the role of REM sleep, fear conditioning, and the neurological processes that contribute to PTSD development. The conversation delves into why women are more susceptible to PTSD, the potential of sleep interventions, and breakthrough research on preventing trauma-related sleep disorders. Whether you're a healthcare professional or interested in understanding the intricate connections between sleep and mental health, this episode offers valuable perspectives on trauma, sleep, and healing.

Discover why 70% of OSA patients have non-anatomical causes and how understanding these distinct endotypes can revolutionize treatment approaches. The conversation delves into practical applications for clinical settings, examining the roles of obesity and nasal obstruction in sleep apnea while discussing targeted therapeutic strategies, including GABAergic medications.

But, for too many women in the US, pregnancy leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Our US maternal mortality rate increased from 20.1 per 100,000 live births in 2019 to 32.9 per 100,000 live births in 2021. For black women, this was 69.9 deaths per 100,000 live births. The causes are severe bleeding, infections, and preeclampsia/eclampsia. The CDC indicates that 4/5 pregnancy-related deaths in the US are preventable. Dr. Ghada Bourjeily is here to show us how maternal mortality intersects with sleep medicine.

Dr. Matt Troester, Dr. Alcibiades Rodriguez and Dr. Rich Berry are here to review these changes and highlight the most clinically pertinent information from the latest iteration of the scoring manual version 3.

Please note that this is not legal advice. This discussion is for educational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion.